Hi all
I'd like to propose an extension to the FOM_Request class with the property
'remoteUser'.
Use case
The servlet container is configured for 'basic authentication'. The Flow script
needs the login name to map it to a User object.
Alternative
---
Use Input Module to pass
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Christian Haul wrote:
Hi team.
I will be offline 'till ~12th (and largely have been for some days already)
due to some happy event in my life: I'm going to marry my girl friend tomorrow!
Welcome to the club :-) Congratulations
Giacomo
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
snip/
I hope this makes sense :) if not at all, we can revert it.
Not exactly; see Sylvain's response and in addition to it please recall
a vote about flow model add only very necessary
: ${request.getParameter('publishedJobServery')}
this works for me.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
to use a String array for validchecks to get all checked keys.
This is also used for prepareing all checkboxes for display with values
in validchecks switched on (have a look at the hobby part in the jxform
samples).
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML
pipeline gets
its on set of parameters IIRC.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
the threads-per-processor parameter)
Ok, I tested on W2k and Windows XP, sun jdk 1.4.1 and 1.4.2. Perhaps the
os is the difference?
No! I've the same system where any additional Commands won't be
triggered (Linux, sun jdk 1.4.2).
Carsten
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part
de Giacomo Pati
Envoyé : mardi 26 août 2003 20:44
À : Cocoon-Dev (E-mail)
Objet : Re: transformer developer
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, arnaud daneels wrote:
hello,
i can't find how
on it?
I've just made a standalone main app with the CommandManager and,
confusing enought, it works correclty as expected.
So, it must be the environment Cocoon runs in that causes troubles
(Servlet?)
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Tony Collen wrote:
Is it this simple? Or should the DefaultScheduler or the ThreadManager
be in charge of determining whether a Target should be triggered?
To my knowledge, yes, it is the simplest solution :-)
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
better.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
command right after
constructing the CommandManager in Cocoon.java).
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
, then it keeps working.
Have not tried using a second Thread.
According to Giacomo, the CommandManager works just fine in a
non-servlet environment.
Right.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
already in bugzilla:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730
But: this is an incompatible change (however the impace should be
very small).
So, please vote on the change.
and please vote if this is a change for 2.1.1 or 2.2.
+1 for 2.1.x
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 19:55, Giacomo Pati wrote:
if you add the following code before the closing bracket of the
PooledExecutor.workerDone(...) method, then it --seems to-- work:
if (!shutdown_) {
if (poolSize_ maximumPoolSize_
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 17:24, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:20, Giacomo Pati wrote:
snip/
I like the way how the Cornerstone Scheduler recently integrated by
Carsten more than the CommandManager way because of its
componentisation
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 20:38, Giacomo Pati wrote:
First, if you look at the Cornerstone Scheduler you'll see that the
ability to define repeated tasks are somehow limited. Business apps can
easily request administration tasks to be run twice a day
,
Andreas
Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 20:38, Giacomo Pati wrote:
First, if you look at the Cornerstone Scheduler you'll see that the
ability to define repeated tasks are somehow limited. Business apps can
easily request
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi!
Just in case you didn't know:
Did you have a look at the Quartz Scheduler?
http://www.part.net/quartz.html
http://www.part.net/quartz_features.html
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Hunsberger, Peter wrote:
Giacomo Pati [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip/
First, if you look at the Cornerstone Scheduler you'll see
that the ability to define repeated tasks are somehow
limited. Business apps can easily request administration
tasks to be run twice
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi!
Just in case you didn't know:
Did you have
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
From: Bruno Dumon
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi!
Just in case
. Otherwise we would
have a good reason to delay 2.1.1 for a (too) long time and IMO we
shouldn't wait to long with a new minor release.
What do you think of the Sept, 15th releasing 2.1.1?
Good for me.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance
to
reproduce the problem and mailed it to Doug Lea.
Hmm.. my Scheduler that uses Doug Leas kit dosn't have any problems at
all.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 16:29, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
On Mon, 1
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:21, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
http://outerthought.net/~bruno
.
+1 for friday.
One thing I'd like to put in:
Now that the new Corn block has been added, can we get rid of the
Cornerstone Scheduler? If we can, it would never appear in ANY release.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http
a branch or another repository?
IMHO this is where CVS braches for bug fixes shine.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
as an infrastructure equivalent to
CVS.
But I'd really like to see a 2.2 module created now. Should we put it to a
vote?
What's the diffrence between a new repository and a branch (I know:
performance)
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
One thing I'd like to put in:
Now that the new Corn block has been added, can we get rid of the
Cornerstone Scheduler? If we can, it would never appear in ANY release.
Corn? Nice. You know, if you go into a pub you often
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
One thing I'd like to put in:
Now that the new Corn block has been added, can we get rid of the
Cornerstone Scheduler? If we can, it would never appear in ANY release.
Ok, it seems that your cron block does the same, so
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Uh, didn't know we already have dependencies on the Cornerstone
scheduler. Yes, found it. The RefresherImpl. The problem with scratchpad
is that it conceptually belongs
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I will have a look at the cron block right now.
Thanks, awaiting your comments :-)
Hi Giacomo,
please look at the other thread (Cron Block). I added
an addPeriodicJob() method to your scheduler to allow
periodic
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
please look at the other thread (Cron Block). I added
an addPeriodicJob() method to your scheduler to allow
periodic invocation (in seconds).
With that change I'm able to convert to your scheduler
and we can
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Yes, this is easy for each second, but what when I want to schedule the
job, let's say every 5 seconds or every 80 minutes?
You don't know cron, don't you?
No, and the expert I ask, suggested to write 0,5,10
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I would love to, but it is - for any reason - not accessible
from here right
now - only the tutorial. And there I found the periodic trigger :)
Go blame you ISP :-)
Or I can drink some corn
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
please look at the other thread (Cron Block). I added
an addPeriodicJob() method to your scheduler to allow
periodic invocation (in seconds).
With that change I'm able to convert to your scheduler
and then there was LogKit..
You probably missed the recent thread about it. Have a look at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-usersm=106206358807904w=2
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
(as we have today
with the local.* files) a running core system: The real core, core
implemetations of abstracted parts, environment implementaion and the
core block implementation (I'm thinking of the BlockDeployerBlock which
was mentioned by someone)
What do you think about this?
--
Giacomo Pati
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On Monday, Sep 22, 2003, at 16:23 Europe/Rome, Giacomo Pati wrote:
SNIP/
I agree with you that even a 'naked cocoon' (a cocoon with no
functional blocks) can be further modularized, even if I personally
don't resonate with the modularization
)?
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
.
Good point. Supported sounds less marketing intrusive.
+1 for supported
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
in the repository. No longer is there a need to have a 13 MB download
for a full distributable. Not to mention, it makes it easier to find out what
exactly is a dependency and what is dead weight.
seconded!
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http
a branch not just tags. During the release
period backport bug fixes to the other branch.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On Thursday, Sep 25, 2003, at 10:47 Europe/Rome, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Berin Loritsch wrote:
snippeddiscussion on build infrastructure/snipped
We tried to have a unified build system with ANT, and all excalibur
projects
moving class by class with the help of an
IDE like Eclipse that helps identifing the missing part until a module
is compilable.
So when and where do we start on 2.2? (As I asked before with Fortress
integration)
Good question :-)
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Giacomo Pati dijo:
But first we need to come to a consensus about which build
infrastructure we would support to use:
1) Ant
in this case we can use the current build system and tune it to the
needs we have for the 2.2 and maybe add
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Well, as my time permits it and Berin could give a hand as well, why
not.
But first we need to come to a consensus about which build
infrastructure we would support to use:
1) Ant
in this case we can use
what's happening, and lay out what we need.
NOTE: I'm the original Centipede author, so yes, I'm definately baised
:-) I knew this would happen
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-
query.asp?acronym=COBString=exactpage=2
even though I like cranky old bastard... expecially for times when
the block won't work as expected ;-)
ROTFL
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
in the
soon-to-be 2.2
repository?
-1
we need the 2.1 repository to be able to do 2.1.x releases. Otherwise we
would ship alpha code and I think people building their applications
upon 2.1 wouldn't be very happy with this.
That's one reason why CVS has branches.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG
the protocol
used to distinguish the type?
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
are raised)
- set leniency always to true on test instructions (jx:if and jx:when)
- add an optional lenient attribute to the jx:out and jx:forEach
statements (would default to the sitemap parameter value above).
What do you think?
+1
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http
you think about this?
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
of jetty). The counterpart interface of
Disposable is Initializable which is called once during the life time of
the component as with the Disposable.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
Anybody encountered the Exception in the form2bean.flow Woody samples
under JDK 1.3? It runs smoth here with a JDK 1.4.2
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 01:40 PM, Giacomo Pati wrote:
Hi Jeremy
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
snipped
public class HibernateFactory
extends AbstractLogEnabled
implements PersistanceFactory, Configurable, Serviceable,
Initializable, Disposable, ThreadSafe
IIRC
Is the idl syntax still the way to describe the FOM documentation?
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
is that is somehow inflexible and
way too programmatic, not very declarative as Anteater is.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
I propose to remove the IDL-docs because they are far from being
up-to-date and the Flow-API is well-described in our usual docs.
Here my +1.
+1 for me.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
to an end.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
- cocoon.sendStatus(status)
- cocoon.sendStatus(status, message)
- cocoon.response.setStatus(status)
- cocoon.response.setStatus(status,message)
+4 from me
+1
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
release components,
removing the ComponentManagerProxy doesn't do any
harm, but provides greater performance.
Please cast your votes:
+1
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
value=http://./
wasn't really elegant. But if you have a good idea just throw it in :-)
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
not to remove my first version after I've figured there
was a getParameterAsBoolean :-(
Thanks Vadim.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
/serializers inside
pipeline (only matchers/error-handler should be there) [this shouldn't
have been there in the first place!]
+1
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
]
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
with CVS). This might give you conflict as soon as you
commit your next changes to the same file or it requires you to
immediately update your tree after such committs.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
David Crossley wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
snip/
That would be nice for us. Unfortunately, we probably have to take
whatever comes and fix it with clever tools before commit.
Be carful when doing precommit reformatting on the cvs server side
(which is doable with CVS
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
The release is built, cvs tagged and the files are currently
uploading. I will send the release mail tomorrow to give
the mirrors some time.
So, this is the end of the code freeze. Change at will.
Cool job, thanks!
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http
?
An absolute +1 here
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
attempt to describe the process here:We've never ha
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=ProjectBuilding
HTH
regards Jeremy
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
, mate!
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
, how is Tomcat doing. IIRC its distribution comes with a jta.jar
inside. Can't we use that?
Giacomo
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
Big +1! This all seams to make much sense.
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
[Sylvain's exploit on stores snipped]
Anybody else encountered a 'Continuation is not defined.' message with
the flow samples when using WLS 8.1?
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
Christopher Oliver wrote:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-usersm=106700554117575w=2
Thanks alot, I must have missed that one.
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Anybody else encountered a 'Continuation is not defined.' message
with the flow samples when using WLS 8.1?
--
Otego AG
it is (but that is personal
preference, I know ;-)
Giacomo
No, actually I prefer this.method() as well, but don't mind if someone
writes
only method(). But I think changing this back and forth is not a good idea.
Carsten
--
Otego AG Tel: +41 (0)1 240 00 55
Giacomo
Christian Haul schrieb:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
-this.reset();
-this.init();
+reset();
+init();
It make sense for member variables but there I'd like to add a prefix
like m_ which cannot be forgotten (as like
:-) If we can't manage to amke it run until than we
could move it to another package and reinstantiate the 2.1 treeprocessor
instead.
--
Otego AG Tel: +41 (0)1 240 00 55
Giacomo Pati, CTO Mobile:+41 (0)79 262 21 04
Apache Software Foundation
I want to propose Daniel Fagerstrom as new Cocoon committer...
big +1
Giacomo
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
Tel: +41 (0)1 240 00 55
Giacomo Pati, CTO Mobile:+41 (0)79 262 21 04
Apache Software Foundation Member Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hohlstrasse 216 Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CH-8004 ZürichWeb: http
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip/
Wow, I feel like a prehistoric man, having finished my studies in
summer... 1989!
In fact, you are! But you are not alone. Hope this helps ;-)
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
cocoon.roles and cocoon.xconf. Is the role already
registered and configured there, this configurations will be used.
Otherwise the configurations from the jar will be used.
Have you read about the Blocks comming with version 2.2
(http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=Blocks)?
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego
and the field is not required it should be valid
without even consulting the validator. Do I miss something?
- other validators (such as assert) will behave according to their
semantics with null values.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance
Giacomo Pati, CTO Mobile:+41 (0)79 262 21 04
Apache Software Foundation Member Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hohlstrasse 216 Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CH-8004 ZürichWeb: http://www.otego.com
Tel: +41 (0)1 240 00 55
Giacomo Pati, CTO Mobile:+41 (0)79 262 21 04
Apache Software Foundation Member Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hohlstrasse 216 Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CH-8004 ZürichWeb: http
is considered
Cocoon internal and what not.
I remember a discussion about separate jars 3 or 4 month ago.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=106424060330963w=2
--
Otego AG Tel: +41 (0)1 240 00 55
Giacomo Pati, CTO Mobile:+41 (0)79
Hi guys
I'm in need of the ODMG API and want do use Apache OJB (which offers a
native implementation of it). Anybody objecting it?
It'd porpose to place it into the OJB block alongside of the JDO
implementation.
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Hi guys
I'm in need of the ODMG API and want do use Apache OJB (which offers a
native implementation of it). Anybody objecting it?
No objection but I am just wondering...
...you would not use both in a project
at the same time - usually
Probably
there as well (I'd
voloteer for this)?
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
+1 for me
I'd also like to know your oppinions about using the new
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/... location to (maybe in
addition for the 2.1.4 release) place the dist (would be
/www/www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/cocoon
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
But: I see a sense in putting our jars there, I'm not so sure what the
use
in putting also the distribution (the src) there is?
If you look at the repository structure proposed there you'll have
distributions directory as well (BTW: IIRC Avalon
version2.1.2/version
typewar/type
/dependency
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
Unico Hommes wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I'm not through with all the mails but I've just encountered
a problem when building under Java 1.3. Could it be that the
included geronimo-spec-jta-DEV-20040116.jar in the slide
block is compiled with a
1.4 compiler?
Yes, it was. I was unaware
Ok, I've compiled the geronimo/specs/jta jar with the property
maven.compile.target=1.1. Now at least it compiles.
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I'm not through with all the mails but I've just encountered a
problem when building under Java 1.3. Could
Unico Hommes wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Ok, I've compiled the geronimo/specs/jta jar with the
property maven.compile.target=1.1. Now at least it compiles.
Thanks Giacomo. I was looking into the same. According to the maven java
plugin documentation that should have been the default.
Well, I
Ralph Goers wrote:
This sounds interesting. However, isn't 2.2 dumping excalibur in favor of
fortress? (Just my impression from some of the emails here). Does fortress
have something similar?
Yes, of cource!
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business
1 - 100 of 632 matches
Mail list logo
