On 1/10/06, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This plain language FAQ is helpful:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/licence-FAQ.html#WhatDoesItMEAN
and follow through to the preFAQ which has a good overview,
Any idea why this is stated in the pre-FAQ?
quote
9. You have questions
On 1/4/06, Max Pfingsthorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoff Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/20/05, Max Pfingsthorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On another note: I need the eventcaching block for webdav, but
that one only needs jms in one class, and databases
On 12/20/05, Max Pfingsthorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On another note: I need the eventcaching block for webdav, but
that one only needs jms in one class, and databases in the
samples. So, I'll work on the dependency issue there instead of
in the webdav block directly.
...
On 11/23/05, Max Pfingsthorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoff Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/21/05, Max Pfingsthorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Cocooners!
I have a question: I couldn't find a nice EventAware object
cache in Cocoon, the eventcache block only implements
On 11/23/05, Max Pfingsthorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoff Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/23/05, Max Pfingsthorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoff Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/21/05, Max Pfingsthorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I missed
On 11/23/05, Max Pfingsthorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoff Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Would it be sufficient to configure JMSEventMessageListener with a
list of EventAwares? If the EAManager is necessary, I
guess it would
have to be configured with such a list
On 11/21/05, Max Pfingsthorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Cocooners!
I have a question: I couldn't find a nice EventAware object cache in Cocoon,
the eventcache block only implements the o.a.c.caching.Cache which I need to
pass a byte array. Serializing/deserializing is not really an option
:
Geoff Howard wrote:
ooops
so can you boost my rights too?
done.
Upayavira
FYI, I think I've created a daisy account and might start taking a
whack at documentation.
On 9/9/05, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Let us know when you've created your account.
created.
You now have doc-editor and doc-committer rights.
I'll de-lurk for a minute to say - sounds good to me. Better than
what we have now.
If you're looking to consider alternatives as well, IIRC there was
some discussion of implementing a delayed wrapper around the multipart
parsing to allow finer-grained control of when, how, and if the parts
were
http://www.infoworld.com/testcenter/
http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/07/11/28TCxmlcm_1.html
Geoff
+1
Geoff
On 7/10/05, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you all know, Max Pfingsthorn is one of our Google Summer of Code students
and he will work on the implementation of the cforms library.
In order to make his life and the life of his two mentors (Sylvain and I)
easier, I want
You'll find some discussions in the dev archives I believe. Probably
better to search more generally on calendar, but iCal comes up
specifically.
Geoff
On 6/20/05, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone thought about integrating iCal with Cocoon?
...feel free to do it :)
On 6/9/05, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As granting committership requires a vote, please cast your votes now:
[ ] Helma Van Der Linden as a Cocoon committer
+1 - Welcome!
Very excited about the zone and the new live docs env...
Geoff
On 5/2/05, Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I propose to remove @author tags with people names from all our
source files.
+1
Additionally, if you agree with removing names, do you want source files
to have:
[X] no @author tag at all,
Additionally, non-committers that have
Upayavira,
As I've only been able to marginally follow the new 2.2 docs strategy
(especially because there have been several I think over time!) :) I
wasn't sure what to do with this doc in 2.2. I also am not clear how
much of it will be accurate in 2.2.
I'll try to take a look at some point
On Apr 12, 2005 2:33 AM, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Is posible to change the name from:
block.xml - cob.xml
ATM everything is possible ;-)
I see the analogy to WEB-INF/ -- web.xml.
IMHO this is to keep the same name and avoid confusions. ;-)
On Apr 11, 2005 4:57 PM, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
I don't know why we named it COB-INF but there was (still is?) a good
reason for this because I remember some long discussion.
IIRC, reason was to avoid conflict with avalon/phoenix/somesuch
On Apr 9, 2005 6:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear community,
...
Please cast your votes:
here's my +1
And mine! +1
Geoff
I'm interested and have some eclipse plugin experience (not expert,
but not newbie). Unfortunately, as you can tell I've been unable to
help much recently. If you start it I'll certainly at least lurk on
the list and as possible, really jump in.
Geoff
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:04:11 +0300
Anyone looked at or working on a Cocoon front-end to Agila?
(http://incubator.apache.org/projects/agila.html)
I've seen a few of you in the incubator archives for it.
Geoff
Sounds fine. (not +1 because this isn't a vote and one isn't needed).
I look forward to test-driving the new improved version, and the
potential for further symbiosis with MIT W3C
Geoff
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 23:37:57 -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For this reason, I propose
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:27:32 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32212
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-28 19:27 ---
I have added this feature in a different way - didn't know about this patch :|
FYI, in the competition is the sincerest form of flattery dept:
People who are subscribed to the list through gmail may have noticed
that the following ad from orbeon is showing up in the Sponsored
Links area. Presumably they have bought a google ad word for
cocoon?
www.orbeon.com -
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 09:42:17 +0100, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
My first goal is
reusing existing functionality (SVN, Forrest, static web pages). Writing
the missing pieces (a small web application to edit docs online) shouldn't
be too difficult - especially using CocoonForms
+1 on the French list.
FWIW, I think the argument below fails to take into consideration the
increase in signal to noise ratio mentioned in Sylvain's original
rationale. If there are suddenly 5 languages mixed on the lists, most
people are going to find between 50-80% (assuming the average
odd that this is breaking in different places for everyone. Do you
all have different sets of blocks enabled?
If not, I'm suspicious of out of memory error or something odd like
that. In that case, any chance that the docs build tasks could mask
some odd condition like that with such an error?
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:54:01 +0100, Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
map:components roles-file=... config-file=...
..
/map:components
+1
Maybe I missed it on the list before but google alerted me to the
following which is part two of an interview with Steven:
http://www.builderau.com.au/program/0,39024614,39170563,00.htm
Haven't read it yet, so I hope it's nothing embarassing! :)
Geoff
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:04:20 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 10 déc. 04, à 14:44, Upayavira a écrit :
...I like this kind of approach, and am implementing a similar system
at the moment...
Great! Let's make this a documented/mainstream part of Cocoon, it's
cheap to
I'd just use eclipse to find every class that implements the right
interface(s). Would that work?
Geoff
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:46:36 +1100, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to create a list of all sitemap
components in the Cocoon core and blocks.
So far i have tried to
I'll be out with the family today, but if no one does by tonight (GMT
-5), I'll take a look. Thanks for your work.
Geoff
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:25:54 -0700, Micah Dubinko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just stuck a patch into Cocoon bugzilla,
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 21:51:46 -0500, Vadim Gritsenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
bash-2.05b$ groups tschlabach
tschlabach apcvs lenya
This should mean you have commit access to lenya. Only one way to be
sure... :)
No, it does not :) Lenya is in SVN
http
bash-2.05b$ groups tschlabach
tschlabach apcvs lenya
This should mean you have commit access to lenya. Only one way to be sure... :)
Congrats,
Geoff Howard
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:39:04 -0600 (CST), Antonio Gallardo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo:
Hi all,
I received my
Long shot (based on my google results), but anyone know of a
java-based tool/ highlevel api for working with icap connections such
as that commonly used by anti virus apps?
Geoff
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:25:46 +0100, Unico Hommes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
...
I guess my question about optional dependencies gave the wrong
impression of the utility of jms in event cache. I don't think it's a
problem having a dependency on the jms api in this block
thanks, Antonio. I think I was trying to commit at the exact time you were.
Geoff
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:17:56 -0600 (CST), Antonio Gallardo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Niclas:
Done.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
Niclas Hedhman dijo:
Gang,
If you look at
And whole of cocoon was not at stake, just the eventcache block.
There is one (?)class in eventcache which provides support for JMS
messages invalidating cache (which in my original vision was the
primary use) and thus this dependency on the JMS api. Do we in gump,
or in blocks build have
.
Geoff
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:55:47 -0600 (CST), Antonio Gallardo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Geoff.
Please change it. I just follow the Niclas' advise. ;-)
Are there some mock classes to address that?
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
Geoff Howard dijo:
And whole of cocoon
Bugzilla is broken the last few times I've cheked, but if anyone is
tracking this issue on the dev list, I've found a problem with this
patch. It causes a parse exception when both a text input and a file
are sent in the same request. I don't have time to track it down
right now - I can send my
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:20:56 -0600 (CST), Luigi Bai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to point out that the Multipart support in Cocoon is one of the
few things that isn't pluggable or replaceable. I'd like it to be possible
to configure web.xml/CocoonServlet to take a class name that implements
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:43:37 +0100, Ugo Cei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il giorno 02/nov/04, alle 15:29, Jorg Heymans ha scritto:
Is there a reason why we have our own multipart parser instead of
using commons-fileupload? This has come up already about 1.5 years ago
[1].
Maybe when the
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 14:16:45 -0600 (CST), Luigi Bai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Geoff Howard wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:20:56 -0600 (CST), Luigi Bai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I read your reference and Stefano's proposal.
Excellent.
I agree with the concept
Can someone give some help figuring out what is wrong with gump for
the JMS block? The build snippet below appears to show a failure due
to classpath (unresolved symbol) but the geronimo jms spec jar is in
the classpath (also below) and the block actually does build using the
build script.
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:04:31 +0200, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
In fact both have been around for quite some
time, contributed in discussions, sent patches
and showed they care about cocoon and its community.
...
Folks please cast your votes for:
[+1] Leszek
[+1] Ralph
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:20:03 -0700, Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier made me realize that there are 3 different issues on the table
regarding real blocks:
1) classloading isolation
2) pojoification
3) service isolation
Aha!
...
So here is my proposal for Cocoon 2.2
You also should be able to write your xpatch file to replace the
comment containing the text debugger (for example) with your desired
setting. I think this may be done in the jdbc xpatch files?
Geoff
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:27:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
small
http://www.iternum.com/ui-demo/demos.jsp
Google related links popped this up recently on a CForms/Cocoon email.
Anyone know it and can provide a competitive analysis?
Geoff
new attachment for the existing bug.
thanks
- Original Message -
From: Adam Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:21:39 +1200
Subject: Updating a patch
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I need to update the patch that I submitted for flow/web services
integration,
On 15 Sep 2004 10:29:27 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31234
Event Aware cache does not remove registry key
...
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-15 10:29 ---
Thanks Oliver, I applied your
POV = point of view
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:47:27 +0200, Antonio Fiol Bonnín
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said in a previous e-mail (Sep 10), we downloaded PDF box
(www.pdfbox.org), but it seems to us a bit hard to use.
This project uses the BSD license. I think this can be a good
Yes, unbelievably so!
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 12:17:57 +0200, Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a test, wondering why the list is so silent lately. Is everyone busy?
Sylvain
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 10:15:29 -0400, Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
+1 for the branch
and although I really like the name tani
I think we should stick to what we decided.
no fancy names.
+1 for keeping the new-kernel (or naming
it block-kernel)
I'm still in skimming mode, but I'll lob a nearly incoherent thought
in from the sidelines...
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:34:29 -0700, Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
A little bit of history is needed:
- at the beginning there was no sitemap. all the pipeline machinery was
Steven Noels wrote:
Here's the current list of nominations - people who already clearly
declined are not on the list anymore. Sort order alphabetic on first name.
- Vadim Gritsenko
Only one I've met IRL -- +1. I'd be enthusiastically in favor of any of them,
though.
Geoff
http://www.sleepycat.com/download/licensinginfo.shtml
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
http://www.sleepycat.com/products/je.shtml
Need I say more? ;-)
Now, the only problem is that this requires java 1.4.2 because of memory
mapped files.
If you ask me, this feature, alone, is enough for throwing 1.3
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
The more I look into this store problem, the more I get confused.
I think I understood from Sylvains explanation that the persistent
store should only be used by our store as a back up.
Looking through our code, I found out, that some components
still use the persistent
Ooops, sent to wrong list. Anyone know enough about ezmlm?
Geoff
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Tony Collen wrote:
This is a just general FYI for anyone who posts to the user and -dev
lists:
*Please un-set the option which causes your mail client to request a
return receipt!*
...
A good way to
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Askild Aaberg Olsen wrote:
A link from http://www.mattkruse.com/javascript/calendarpopup/
leads to http://www.webreference.com/dhtml/diner/seethru/
Bingo. And solution is to upgrade to Mozilla.
I'll add another workaround to the pool: hide all windowed controls
before
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 14:28, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 10 mai 04, à 05:59, David Crossley a écrit :
...I think that it should be called the tour block, yet still
have the familiar name of Supersonic Tour...
Do others have the same opinion? If so I'm ok to rename the
+1 from me - I didn't know why it was that way either and just left things as I
found them whenever I've touched it. This task goes back pretty far though IIRC
- maybe there was a forgotten reason?
Geoff
Ralph Goers wrote:
I had thought about doing this in my last update to XConfToolTask,
No, you're not the only one - but far from being upset I am always happy to get
commercial Cocoon information, especially from someone actually involved in the
community.
Geoff
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Am i the only one who has received unsollicited cocoon related
advertisement mail from
Tony Collen wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
No, you're not the only one - but far from being upset I am always
happy to get commercial Cocoon information, especially from someone
actually involved in the community.
Geoff
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Am i the only one who has received unsollicited cocoon
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
snip
I already said in several mails that we should reduce the recommended
options:
1.) Use O/R-mapper if possible
2.) if you only have publishing tasks use the sqlTransformer
3.) If the learning curve for an O/R-mapper is too steep for you take
Ugo Cei wrote:
roy huang wrote:
Hi,ugo:
I checked CalendarGenerator today and thought about how it can be used.I was a Lotus
Notes programmer,there's a kind of calendar view in Notes.We like to display
meetings,arrangements(scheduling stuffs) in this kind of view.Today I check
Ugo Cei wrote:
I think everyone interested has had the option of venting his opinion on
the subject of checked vs. unchecked exceptions. For the record, here
[1] is the relevant thread.
In order to move forward, I propose to reparent the
org.apache.cocoon.ProcessingException to extend
Berin Loritsch wrote:
I have been following the (un)checked exception dialog because I feel
that it is the easiest/best place for me to get back in the swing of
things with Cocoon. I saw a couple comments about a new core for
Cocoon, and I was wondering if someone could throw a couple links my
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
:) Sounds good to me. Now what do you think of using the
things from
Avalon that are good (for us)? Now, I think, some of the interfaces
(for logging, contextualization, initialization) are good
and we could
directly use them instead of
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
in the past I was used to:
1) cp blocks.properties local.blocks.properties
2) vi local.blocks.properties
3) uncomment the blocks that I wanted to exclude
Today, I have to go thru a bunch of include and change them from true to
false. Much more hassle than just
Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 05/apr/04, alle 15:38, Geoff Howard ha scritto:
Is / . that much more harder than arrow down x ?
The coommand for findiing the next match is n not /.
Actually, it's /-enter (a blank search - it's an old habit) -
they both work.
Geoff
Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 05/apr/04, alle 16:54, Geoff Howard ha scritto:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 05/apr/04, alle 15:38, Geoff Howard ha scritto:
Is / . that much more harder than arrow down x ?
The coommand for findiing the next match is n not /.
Actually, it's /-enter (a blank search
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Andrzej Jan Taramina wrote:
...
persistent-store logger=core.store.persistent
parameter name=use-cache-directory value=true/
parameter name=order value=2701/
/persistent-store
An aside...what the heck is the order value anyway?
No idea :-/
I don't know for sure but I
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Andrzej Jan Taramina wrote:
...
persistent-store logger=core.store.persistent
parameter name=use-cache-directory value=true/
parameter name=order value=2701/
/persistent-store
An aside...what the heck is the order value
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
snip/
I don't know for sure but I think it's the order of the index used
by the JISP impl.
Thanks for this enlightning explanation, but erm... what is the
order of an index???
;-)
http://www.coyotegulch.com
Hunsberger, Peter wrote:
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 31 Mar 2004, at 21:39, Hunsberger, Peter wrote:
My assembler exposure (many years of OS maintenance) was
the IBM 370
(latter 390) variant, more registers, but basically the
same kind of
muckity muck with the addition
Andrzej Jan Taramina wrote:
Unico:
It's in the scratchpad block. There is a JCS store implementation and an
EHCache one. If you build with the scratchpad block included some
commented-out example configurations will be in cocoon.xconf. All you need to
do is uncomment them.
Wonderful! This
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Guys,
Is anyone interested in nested input module support in the sitemap?
I am (as a user :-)
Me too (though I didn't understand the example below).
I want to be able to say:
{i18n:{1}.{locale}.xml} and have my i18n input module go and look to
Tony Collen wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Guys,
Is anyone interested in nested input module support in the sitemap? I
want to be able to say:
Of course, this would allow something like this:
{urlencode:{request-param:foo}}
Which I think people have been clamoring for for a while ;)
Yup. Very
Tim Larson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 08:52:21AM -0500, Brian McCallister wrote:
Hi all, been hanging out a long time and am now using Cocoon in
production for a few apps, and cannot imagine going back to ye olde
way.
Welcome.
What can I do to help out? (ie -- any pointers on what
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I want Cocoon to last long and to be able to stand the pressure of a big
user community, a diverse development community and that of companies
built on top of it.
...
This leads to a rather difficult choice:
1) avoid implementing real blocks
2) change our foundation
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Fire at will: I have my abstesto underwear on.
Put it off: it doesn't help to get code written (see point 6)!
Please, Stefano - *do not* under any circumstances (despite Sylvain's
suggestion) take your underwear off while coding. :)
Geoff
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 23.03.2004 20:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stephan 2004/03/23 11:23:07
Modified:tools/src blocks-build.xsl
Log:
Allow to share codebase to other blocks.
pathelement
location=${{build.blocks}}/{$block-name}/mocks/
+pathelement
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
Modified:.status.xml
tools/targets webapp-build.xml
Log:
action dev=CZ type=fix fixes-bug=27217 due-to=Andreas
Hartmann due-to-email=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build System: Apply filtering
Upayavira wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Geoff Howard
Knowing that properties are already replaced, do you see a purpose
for this still?
Yes, filtering :) Just use a @loglevel@ in a patch file for the
logging configuration, and without the patch it doesn't work.
Now, if I understand
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
Exactly. Although I didn't quite understand the bit about
adding a loglevel property for build.webapp.loglevel - it
already is a property isn't it?
Yes, but with a long and not so intuitiv name. That's why I
suggested the shorter form
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cziegeler2004/03/15 10:11:25
Modified:.status.xml
tools/targets webapp-build.xml
Log:
action dev=CZ type=fix fixes-bug=27217 due-to=Andreas Hartmann
due-to-email=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build System: Apply filtering to patched
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Sounds like the way to go, intelligently downloading dependencies from
some non-ASF repository should solve most, maybe all of the licensing
problems, and help make Cocoon more lightweight for many uses.
IIRC last time this was discussed the debate quickly moved to a
Unico Hommes wrote:
Stephan Michels wrote:
Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb Unico Hommes um 19:24:
There remain a few issues that need resolving.
- InputModuleAction had to move along with xsp because it has a
dependency on some xsp helper class. This is unfortunate and maybe
unnecessary.
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Isn't this missing the whole point of the current licensing
discussion? If we cook up a system that allows us to create and
distribute cocoon but that product now cannot be used to build a
commercial application without questions of further license
requirements (source
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
So let's finally vote on this.
- do you want to add an importance=high|low|medium attribute on
action in changes.xml?
+.5
- do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file?
-0, reduces visibility.
Let's do instead:
* Do you want to
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
We should move XSP in a block anyway.
+1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard
+0.5 (=good idea, won't be able to help)
same here,
Geoff
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Geoff Howard dijo:
Ok, I think this bears bringing this issue up in a new thread (so people
notice it). The point I take out of this is that JCS makes it explicit
that successful persistence is not currently guaranteed (at least in the
default better-performing
Corin Moss wrote:
Hiya,
That's a very pertinent set of questions - I'll answer as best I can
below, the only caveat is that I won't proclaim myself a JCS expert,
given that I was really only introduced to it a few days ago ;)
Ok, fair enough! :)
...
Ok, I apologize that I just can't look
Unico Hommes wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
Corin Moss wrote:
Hi Guys,
I might be getting ahead of myself a bit here, but I'm going to
try and turn off the default MRU store, in favour of the JCS based
persistent store. I'd like to try some tests on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know if my vote counts, just in case: +1
Helma
Technically, the vote of a non-committer isn't binding, but your
opinion (and anyone like you) is important and definitely counts.
Always feel free to pipe in.
Geoff
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Turning off default MRU store
Geoff Howard wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
Corin Moss wrote:
Hi Guys,
I might be getting ahead of myself a bit here, but I'm going to
try
Unico Hommes wrote:
Hi gang :-)
A drawback I have been running into lately with eventcache mechanism
is that it lacks the ability to remove heavy processing from the
critical path. An event will simply remove a set of cached pipelines
from the cache completely. Making the subsequent request
Unico Hommes wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
Hi gang :-)
A drawback I have been running into lately with eventcache mechanism
is that it lacks the ability to remove heavy processing from the
critical path. An event will simply remove a set of cached pipelines
from the cache
Unico Hommes wrote:
Corin Moss wrote:
Hiya,
I'm probably wrong here, but my understanding of the RefresherImpl is
that the timeout is used to cache the page on a timed basis a la cron
(although that could be what you mean).
I'm not entirely sure how this helps with external validation directly
Corin Moss wrote:
Ok then,
The JCS based store is pretty much finished (well, obviously the first cut.) As far as I can tell I've implemented everything necessary for a test - there's a few un-used methods not implemented (I've commented these fairly clearly of course ;)
What's the protocol
1 - 100 of 404 matches
Mail list logo
