Le Jeudi, 11 déc 2003, à 18:00 Europe/Zurich, Ross Gardler a écrit :
David Crossley wrote:
As we discussed in the other Whitepace thread [1] there are
many issues with this, so we need to tread carefully. Imagine
that someone was doing major work on a certain component. When
they do a 'cvs
David Crossley wrote:
As we discussed in the other Whitepace thread [1] there are
many issues with this, so we need to tread carefully. Imagine
that someone was doing major work on a certain component. When
they do a 'cvs update' then they would get massive cvs conflicts.
[1]
On 10 Dec 2003, David Crossley wrote:
Stephan Michels wrote:
after I made some positive experiences with jalopy, an open source
code formatter, I want to offer install jalopy with a proposal
for the our code convention.
What do you mean by install? In our CVS? Or does each committer
Hi,
after I made some positive experiences with jalopy, an open source
code formatter, I want to offer install jalopy with a proposal
for the our code convention.
This should be a welcome alternative to the various 'organize imports'
and 'dos2unix' etc.
What do'ya think?
Stephan Michels.
--- Stephan Michels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
after I made some positive experiences with jalopy, an open source
code formatter, I want to offer install jalopy with a proposal
for the our code convention.
This should be a welcome alternative to the various 'organize imports'
and
Le Mardi, 9 déc 2003, à 16:24 Europe/Zurich, Stephan Michels a écrit :
...after I made some positive experiences with jalopy, an open source
code formatter, I want to offer install jalopy with a proposal
for the our code convention
Can you explain how it would be used? CVS preprocessor? ant
Le Mardi, 9 déc 2003, à 17:56 Europe/Zurich, Stephan Michels a écrit :
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...Can you explain how it would be used? CVS preprocessor? ant task
that
everybody has to (painfully) run before every commit?
Ant target, like 'ant format'.
Which one has to run
--- Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Mardi, 9 déc 2003, à 17:56 Europe/Zurich, Stephan Michels a écrit :
Ant target, like 'ant format'.
Which one has to run manually, right?
If so I'm +0.5, provided that we still allow unformatted code in CVS.
+1 for 'ant format' target
For
Stephan Michels wrote:
after I made some positive experiences with jalopy, an open source
code formatter, I want to offer install jalopy with a proposal
for the our code convention.
What do you mean by install? In our CVS? Or does each committer
who wants to help, need to have it installed