Daniel,
First off: great post. I agree with your ideas and reading through this post
I realised I have tried implementing my URL space along these lines, ending
up with a huge and very unclear sitemap, so every improvement is welcome.
However, the example below is a bad one from a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel,
First off: great post. I agree with your ideas and reading through this post
I realised I have tried implementing my URL space along these lines, ending
up with a huge and very unclear sitemap, so every improvement is welcome.
Nice, I had the same realization when
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:29:14 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel,
snip/
In short, the ideas of cool URLs is great, but the implementation domain
might require otherwise.
I'm going to try and find time to respond to Daniel in more detail,
but I think the most important
