Le 17 août 05, à 14:48, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
...So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1
-Bertrand
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
Thanks
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Open
Il giorno 17/ago/05, alle 14:48, Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto:
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1
--
Ugo Cei
Tech Blog: http://agylen.com/
Open Source Zone: http://oszone.org/
Wine Food Blog: http://www.divinocibo.it/
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1
Jorg
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1.
--
Leszek Gawron
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1
/Daniel
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1
Sylvain
--
+1
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
Thanks
Carsten
Hi,
On 17 Aug 2005, at 13:48, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1, assuming the concerns (which I share) about offline work
dependency-handling are covered.
Thanks,
Andrew.
--
Andrew Savory,
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
Thanks
Carsten
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1
cheers
--
Torsten
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 14:48 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1
one more thing,
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
one more thing, though, don't lose gump! doesn't have to work right
away, but keep it in mind.
maven 1 has a goal to build the gump.xml (see
http://maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/gump/) , so I would expect
maven 2 would as well.
Ralph
maven 1 has a goal to build the gump.xml (see http://
maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/gump/) , so I would expect
maven 2 would as well.
maven1 and maven2 plugins are not compatible.
...so the existence of a m1 plugin doesn't mean
too much for m2.
In fact m2 is not properly integrated
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1, Just don't forget
Vadim Gritsenko schrieb:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1
--
Reinhard Pötz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So far the response was positiv, so I think we should just vote about it
and then do it. If you have any questions, please use the proposal thread.
So please cast your votes for switching to Maven2 NOW as
outlined/discussed in the proposal thread.
+1
Bye, Helma
22 matches
Mail list logo
