Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please cast your votes on the 2.1.10 release. +1 Ciao and thanks - -- Giacomo Pati Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6

Vote result for 2.1.10 [was [Vote] Release 2.1.10]

Ok, I counted 8 +1 and one -0, this means, the vote passed successfully and I'll continue with the release. Thanks Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

Joerg Heinicke wrote: Those tests do not involve any sitemap processing, so JXTemplateGenerator is not involved. It's more likely that the upgrade of the XML libs [1] caused this not quite unwanted side effects (removing a marked DIRTY HACK). But this commit was on 27th of November. If

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

IMPORTANT: I reassembled the release as I included recent changes: a) Added the fixes for the failing junit tests in cforms b) Added the patch for a failing xsp soap sample c) Removed the remark about jdk 1.3 So, you can download the new version from http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/cocoon/

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

On 12/19/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...IMPORTANT: I reassembled the release as I included recent changes... Sorry to rain on this party again, but Junit tests in your release candidates fail on non-Windows systems, due to debugging statements which try to create files like

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On 12/19/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...IMPORTANT: I reassembled the release as I included recent changes... Sorry to rain on this party again, but Junit tests in your release candidates fail on non-Windows systems, due to debugging statements

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacretaz at apache.org writes: Sorry to rain on this party again, but Junit tests in your release candidates fail on non-Windows systems, due to debugging statements which try to create files like d:/enum.xml. Oh, sorry for this. Needed this for comparing the files.

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

+1 Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

On 12/19/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...So here are the md5's: MD5 (cocoon-2.1.10rc-src.zip) = 3dfee1d2d8b5f3e761eb763809249073 MD5 (cocoon-2.1.10rc-src.tar.gz) = d073b36274ab359b59bbb760e083a934... Thanks Carsten, and thanks Joerg for the bugfixing. +1 on the release. On

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

My +1 too. Many thanks guys. regards Jeremy On 19 Dec 2006, at 12:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Thanks Carsten, and thanks Joerg for the bugfixing. +1 on the release. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

Here is my (non-binding) +1 :-) Kind regards, Jeroen Reijn Jeremy Quinn wrote: My +1 too. Many thanks guys. regards Jeremy On 19 Dec 2006, at 12:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Thanks Carsten, and thanks Joerg for the bugfixing. +1 on the release.

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

On 12/19/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMPORTANT: I reassembled the release as I included recent changes: a) Added the fixes for the failing junit tests in cforms b) Added the patch for a failing xsp soap sample c) Removed the remark about jdk 1.3 So, you can download the new

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

On 18.12.2006 09:39, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Please cast your votes on the 2.1.10 release. +1 Jörg

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

+1 Cheers, Alfred.

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

Carsten Ziegeler wrote: So here are the md5's: MD5 (cocoon-2.1.10rc-src.tar.gz) = d073b36274ab359b59bbb760e083a934 -0 ... meaning that i don't want to stop the release, however i am concerned that we are not following the new licensing which all releases after early November are asked to

[Vote] Release 2.1.10

Please cast your votes on the 2.1.10 release. The release candidate can be downloaded from: http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/cocoon/ The corresponding sources are under: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/tags/RC_2_1_10/ The vote will be open for 72 hours. If the vote passes, I will

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Please cast your votes on the 2.1.10 release. The release candidate can be downloaded from: http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/cocoon/ The corresponding sources are under: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/tags/RC_2_1_10/ +1 Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

On 12/18/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...The release candidate can be downloaded from: http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/cocoon/.. On my macosx system with either JDK 1.4.2 or 1.5, all the automated tests from org.apache.cocoon.forms.datatype fail

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On 12/18/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...The release candidate can be downloaded from: http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/cocoon/.. On my macosx system with either JDK 1.4.2 or 1.5, all the automated tests from org.apache.cocoon.forms.datatype

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

On 18.12.2006 10:42, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: all the automated tests from org.apache.cocoon.forms.datatype fail (DynamicSelectionListTestCase,EnumSelectionListTestCase,FlowJXPathSelectionListTestCase). IIRC the same tests passed last week, anyone know what could have changed? This is

Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10

On 18.12.2006 20:34, Joerg Heinicke wrote: all the automated tests from org.apache.cocoon.forms.datatype fail (DynamicSelectionListTestCase,EnumSelectionListTestCase,FlowJXPathSelectionListTestCase). IIRC the same tests passed last week, anyone know what could have changed? As forms block