Re: [cforms] New ProcessingPhases added a repeater bug?

2006-06-19 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Carsten Ziegeler escribió: Antonio Gallardo wrote: It's not it does not work. The code was moved out because this seems to be a better place for firing form events. This events are form events, hence the form should fire them as needed. IMHO, the binding framework does not need

Re: [cforms] New ProcessingPhases added a repeater bug?

2006-06-19 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Antonio Gallardo wrote: There are 2 very close file that we need to merge first: Form.js [1] for js flow and FormInstance.java [2] for javaflow The later seems to be lagging new functionality. But both files needs to provide the same functionality. BTW, an interesting outdated patch [3]

Re: [cforms] New ProcessingPhases added a repeater bug?

2006-06-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi Leo, Thanks for the input! It's now fixed: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414691view=rev Can you please explain why it works if the events are fired from flowscript and why it does not work if they're fired from the binding framework. I think we should try to

Re: [cforms] New ProcessingPhases added a repeater bug?

2006-06-16 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Carsten Ziegeler escribió: Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi Leo, Thanks for the input! It's now fixed: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414691view=rev Hi Carsten, Thanks for taking your time for reviewing this. :-) Can you please explain why it works if the events are fired from

Re: [cforms] New ProcessingPhases added a repeater bug?

2006-06-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Antonio Gallardo wrote: It's not it does not work. The code was moved out because this seems to be a better place for firing form events. This events are form events, hence the form should fire them as needed. IMHO, the binding framework does not need to know/care about special form

Re: [cforms] New ProcessingPhases added a repeater bug?

2006-06-15 Thread Leo Leonid
On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:06 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi folks, Carlos and I suspect we hit a recently introduced bug. Steps to reproduce == 1. Open http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/demos/21branch/samples/ blocks/forms/form2bean.flow 2. Change birthday date to a valid date

Re: [cforms] New ProcessingPhases added a repeater bug?

2006-06-15 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Leo Leonid escribió: On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:06 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi folks, Carlos and I suspect we hit a recently introduced bug. Steps to reproduce == 1. Open http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/demos/21branch/samples/blocks/forms/form2bean.flow 2. Change birthday

[cforms] New ProcessingPhases added a repeater bug?

2006-06-14 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Hi folks, Carlos and I suspect we hit a recently introduced bug. Steps to reproduce == 1. Open http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/demos/21branch/samples/blocks/forms/form2bean.flow 2. Change birthday date to a valid date (just changing the year to 2000 is enough). 3. Delete the