Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6

2004-12-01 Thread Sylvain Wallez
wrote: Hi Sylvain: I tried this before but failed(see my first mail in this thread),but today I found the key: I change import url in jx_template from jx:import uri=resource://org/apache/cocoon/forms/generation/template.jx/ to: jx:import

Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6

2004-12-01 Thread roy huang
Subject: Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6 wrote: Hi Sylvain: I tried this before but failed(see my first mail in this thread),but today I found the key: I change import url in jx_template from jx:import uri=resource://org/apache/cocoon/forms/generation

Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6

2004-11-28 Thread
-macros.xml/ the state invisibled work. jx-macros.xml is the new file in 2.1.6,can it replace template.jx? Roy Huang From: Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 12:50:17

Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6

2004-11-26 Thread roy huang
, 2004 9:41 PM Subject: Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6 roy huang wrote: Hi,all: in 2.1.6,Forms add widget state.I have test it yesterday and found some problems and questions. Questions: In V2 flowscript,I can set widget state: var name

Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6

2004-11-26 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 22.11.2004 14:41, Sylvain Wallez wrote: What you describe here comes again to an additional output state ... and makes the output widget obsolete? We had this in mind since a long time ... e.g. at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10830131522r=1w=4. Joerg

Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6

2004-11-26 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 22.11.2004 14:41, Sylvain Wallez wrote: What you describe here comes again to an additional output state ... and makes the output widget obsolete? We had this in mind since a long time ... e.g. at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10830131522r=1w=4. Mmmh...

Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6

2004-11-26 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 26.11.2004 14:00, Sylvain Wallez wrote: What you describe here comes again to an additional output state ... and makes the output widget obsolete? We had this in mind since a long time ... e.g. at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10830131522r=1w=4. Mmmh... for sure that obsoletes the

Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6

2004-11-26 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 26.11.2004 14:00, Sylvain Wallez wrote: What you describe here comes again to an additional output state ... and makes the output widget obsolete? We had this in mind since a long time ... e.g. at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10830131522r=1w=4. Mmmh... for sure

Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6

2004-11-22 Thread Sylvain Wallez
roy huang wrote: Hi,all: in 2.1.6,Forms add widget state.I have test it yesterday and found some problems and questions. Questions: In V2 flowscript,I can set widget state: var name=form.lookupWidget(name); name.state=disabled; but in V1,I can get but set will

Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6

2004-11-22 Thread
,it alse break the rule of seperate diplay and logic. WDYT? Roy Huang From: Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:41:30 +0100 roy huang wrote: Hi,all

Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6

2004-11-21 Thread roy huang
Hi,all: in 2.1.6,Forms add widget state.I have test it yesterday and found some problems and questions. Questions: In V2 flowscript,I can set widget state: var name=form.lookupWidget(name); name.state=disabled; but in V1,I can get but set will produce an error: