Revivingg 2.1 development (was Re: [RT] OSGi based blocks)

2006-03-15 Thread Upayavira
Peter Hunsberger wrote: On 3/15/06, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ I would like to see blocks and Cocoon 2.1.X move along in parallel, and as soon as blocks are sufficiently mature and stable, they merge. The current state of affairs with a tiny minority working on blocks (however

Re: Revivingg 2.1 development (was Re: [RT] OSGi based blocks)

2006-03-15 Thread Peter Hunsberger
On 3/15/06, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Who _really_ is following the blocks thread anyway other than the core developers? I want someone else for the rest of us to follow. So, what else do you want that you can't do in 2.1 and are unwilling to do in 2.2? -- Peter Hunsberger