Good morning David,
if an action is required to fix the release, so +1.
Cocoon 2.X people: are you following? :)
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:40 AM, David
Hi,
I suppose that if we ever manage to release a 2.1.12 package, this
will affect us as well.
Is the way Forrest propose to solve the issue officially approved ?
IMHO, if so, it won't be that hard to modify the Ant build file to
produce separate packages
Hi,
The 2.1 releases all contains jar files from other open source projects
because it was built with Ant but without Ivy. What I read in Jukka's reply
is that there is no consensus yet for binary dependencies in source
releases, which is exactly the case for the 2.1 releases. As long as this
is
Please see the following thread at Apache Forrest which explains
the problem with conducting our release vote on a package that contained
not only our project sources but also contained other binary files.
That thread links to an important discussion at Apache Incubator, etc.
Subject: [Proposal]
