extra bcel jar (was: cvs commit)

2004-03-29 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 29.03.2004 19:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Remove the bcel classes from the xalan.jar and create an extra jar for those. *Ouch*. If I understand this correctly we have to do it for every update on the Xalan jar until our continuations stuff goes into bcel that goes later on into Xalan

Re: extra bcel jar

2004-03-29 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 29.03.2004 19:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Remove the bcel classes from the xalan.jar and create an extra jar for those. *Ouch*. If I understand this correctly we have to do it for every update on the Xalan jar until our continuations stuff goes into bcel that

Re: extra bcel jar

2004-03-29 Thread Stephan Michels
Am Mo, den 29.03.2004 schrieb Gianugo Rabellino um 21:46: Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 29.03.2004 19:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Remove the bcel classes from the xalan.jar and create an extra jar for those. *Ouch*. If I understand this correctly we have to do it for every

Re: extra bcel jar

2004-03-29 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Stephan Michels dijo: Am Mo, den 29.03.2004 schrieb Gianugo Rabellino um 21:46: Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 29.03.2004 19:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Remove the bcel classes from the xalan.jar and create an extra jar for those. *Ouch*. If I understand this correctly we have to

Re: extra bcel jar

2004-03-29 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
Antonio Gallardo wrote: Well, at a very least everything is under the ASL and in sync now... wouldn't Gump be able to spot the problem if we miss a cycle? BTW, I think it's a very bad idea to capsulate so many projects in their jar. The current jar includes BCEL, CUP and jakarta-regex. Note that

RE: extra bcel jar

2004-03-29 Thread Ralph Goers
to create a version without the dependent jars. Ralph -Original Message- From: Gianugo Rabellino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: extra bcel jar Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 29.03.2004 19:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

RE: extra bcel jar

2004-03-29 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Ralph Goers dijo: I would suggest that someone open a bugzilla report with them and get them to create a version without the dependent jars. Good idea. Can you do that? Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo

Re: extra bcel jar

2004-03-29 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 29.03.2004 22:38, Ralph Goers wrote: Sure. If you are doing it, can you please post the bug number or add [EMAIL PROTECTED] as CC? Thanks, Joerg

RE: extra bcel jar

2004-03-29 Thread Ralph Goers
The bug number is 28032. I added this list as the CC. Ralph -Original Message- From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: extra bcel jar On 29.03.2004 22:38, Ralph Goers wrote: Sure. If you are doing it, can

Re: extra bcel jar

2004-03-29 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Tim Larson wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 02:25:24PM -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote: While seeing inside the jars I also saw some parts that are interesting for us (now with the Cocoon hat on). For example all the DOM management. I saw the DOMHelpers classes everywhere doing the same over and

Re: extra bcel jar

2004-03-29 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Vadim Gritsenko dijo: Tim Larson wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 02:25:24PM -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote: While seeing inside the jars I also saw some parts that are interesting for us (now with the Cocoon hat on). For example all the DOM management. I saw the DOMHelpers classes everywhere