--- On Fri, 3/13/09, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Friday, March 13, 2009, 6:40 AM
+1 from me.
On Fri, Mar
On 2009-03-13, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me.
Thanks Niall, I was already fearing the vote would fail since Torsten
is on vacation so he won't be able to vote either.
If only pmc members planning to contribute vote +1 to promotions then
we should probably shut
On 13/03/2009, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
One more try :)
Stating that the Java version is 1.4 on the website will be done
post-release (I'm going to split the CLI and
+1
On 13/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2009-03-13, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me.
Thanks Niall, I was already fearing the vote would fail since Torsten
is on vacation so he won't be able to vote either.
If only pmc members
+1 knowing that most ad-hoc attempts to implement archive handling is
broken ... :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all,
since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
on the
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
wrote:
+0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM.
I make the same point to you I made to Henri. If people had voted this
way on the
Hi.
I am very interested in contributing to the commons-lang project, but would
like to know the state of it. I've seen several posts in JIRA and in the
developer mailing list about LangTwo and moving to Java 5.0 for version 3.0.
The projects I work on for my company have either moved to Java 6.0,
Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
Hi all,
since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
on the old Jakarta template:
Hi, Michael.
[lang] has been officially marked as targeting 1.5 in its m2 pom, so I suppose
you should feel free to let the patches fly.
Regards,
Matt
--- On Fri, 3/13/09, Michael Wooten mwooten@gmail.com wrote:
From: Michael Wooten mwooten@gmail.com
Subject: [lang] Developer
+1
Oliver
Stefan Bodewig schrieb:
Hi all,
since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
on the old Jakarta template:
I think this guy is getting ready to be merged back to trunk after I make sure
any trunk changes are merged over. It'd be great if anybody wanted to have a
look at it in case I'm on crack.
-Matt
-
To unsubscribe,
Are you going to merge or just replace?
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think this guy is getting ready to be merged back to trunk after I make
sure any trunk changes are merged over. It'd be great if anybody wanted to
have a look at it in case
As long as you've got any changes from trunk that you need in your
branch, I'd say just copy the stuff around (copy trunk to a branch and
copy your branch over to trunk).
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Honestly, I don't rightly know. I suppose I could
I'm trying a (local) reintegrate merge first. In theory that should preserve
trunk's changes...
-Matt
--- On Fri, 3/13/09, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
Subject: Re: [collections] jdk5 branch
To: Commons Developers List
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
wrote:
+0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM.
I make
I'd like to add a comment to my vote :) Compress seems to have a
momentum at the moment from several committer and contributors. I
haven't been looking at the quality of patches/contributions submitted
but I would hope that the committers involved would be looking to
propose people to become
16 matches
Mail list logo