Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-13 Thread Matt Benson
--- On Fri, 3/13/09, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Date: Friday, March 13, 2009, 6:40 AM +1 from me. On Fri, Mar

Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-03-13, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: +1 from me. Thanks Niall, I was already fearing the vote would fail since Torsten is on vacation so he won't be able to vote either. If only pmc members planning to contribute vote +1 to promotions then we should probably shut

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons CLI 1.2 (RC6)

2009-03-13 Thread sebb
On 13/03/2009, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: One more try :) Stating that the Java version is 1.4 on the website will be done post-release (I'm going to split the CLI and

Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-13 Thread sebb
+1 On 13/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2009-03-13, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: +1 from me. Thanks Niall, I was already fearing the vote would fail since Torsten is on vacation so he won't be able to vote either. If only pmc members

Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-13 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
+1 knowing that most ad-hoc attempts to implement archive handling is broken ... :-) Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based on the

Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-13 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: +0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM. I make the same point to you I made to Henri. If people had voted this way on the

[lang] Developer interested in common-lang project

2009-03-13 Thread Michael Wooten
Hi. I am very interested in contributing to the commons-lang project, but would like to know the state of it. I've seen several posts in JIRA and in the developer mailing list about LangTwo and moving to Java 5.0 for version 3.0. The projects I work on for my company have either moved to Java 6.0,

Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-13 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Stefan Bodewig a écrit : Hi all, since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based on the old Jakarta template:

Re: [lang] Developer interested in common-lang project

2009-03-13 Thread Matt Benson
Hi, Michael. [lang] has been officially marked as targeting 1.5 in its m2 pom, so I suppose you should feel free to let the patches fly. Regards, Matt --- On Fri, 3/13/09, Michael Wooten mwooten@gmail.com wrote: From: Michael Wooten mwooten@gmail.com Subject: [lang] Developer

Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-13 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Stefan Bodewig schrieb: Hi all, since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based on the old Jakarta template:

[collections] jdk5 branch

2009-03-13 Thread Matt Benson
I think this guy is getting ready to be merged back to trunk after I make sure any trunk changes are merged over. It'd be great if anybody wanted to have a look at it in case I'm on crack. -Matt - To unsubscribe,

Re: [collections] jdk5 branch

2009-03-13 Thread James Carman
Are you going to merge or just replace? On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote: I think this guy is getting ready to be merged back to trunk after I make sure any trunk changes are merged over.  It'd be great if anybody wanted to have a look at it in case

Re: [collections] jdk5 branch

2009-03-13 Thread James Carman
As long as you've got any changes from trunk that you need in your branch, I'd say just copy the stuff around (copy trunk to a branch and copy your branch over to trunk). On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote: Honestly, I don't rightly know.  I suppose I could

Re: [collections] jdk5 branch

2009-03-13 Thread Matt Benson
I'm trying a (local) reintegrate merge first. In theory that should preserve trunk's changes... -Matt --- On Fri, 3/13/09, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com Subject: Re: [collections] jdk5 branch To: Commons Developers List

Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-13 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: +0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM. I make

Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-13 Thread Niall Pemberton
I'd like to add a comment to my vote :) Compress seems to have a momentum at the moment from several committer and contributors. I haven't been looking at the quality of patches/contributions submitted but I would hope that the committers involved would be looking to propose people to become