Yep. My view is that we should charge in, do whatever is the right
thing and then when we're ready for release we can worry about back
compat and naming and package changing etc.
Please, please bring on the 1.5 desires :)
I'm also favourable to be 1.6+ if there's any value, I just haven't
found
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:56 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/03/2009, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
One more try :)
Stating that the Java version is 1.4 on the website
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
One more try :)
Stating that the Java version is 1.4 on the website will be done
post-release (I'm going to split the CLI and CLI2 websites).
Actually I could not let go this failing test with
Starting up a thread for cleanup discussions on Lang.
I've removed the enum (was a blocker on JDK 5) and enums (people need
to use real enums now) packages from Lang's trunk and moved them to a
lang-backcompat sibling component. I've not made it a branch, it lives
at the same level as trunk and
FYI, I've removed the LangTwo 1.0 version from JIRA.
3.0 is the place to work on those features. We can then solve naming
when we're ready to release.
Hen
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Starting up a thread for cleanup discussions on Lang.
On 14/03/2009, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Starting up a thread for cleanup discussions on Lang.
I've removed the enum (was a blocker on JDK 5) and enums (people need
to use real enums now) packages from Lang's trunk and moved them to a
lang-backcompat sibling component. I've
Henri Yandell a écrit :
Starting up a thread for cleanup discussions on Lang.
I've removed the enum (was a blocker on JDK 5) and enums (people need
to use real enums now) packages from Lang's trunk and moved them to a
lang-backcompat sibling component. I've not made it a branch, it lives
at
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de
wrote:
[snip]
Therefore we may either ensure that a call to create will always reset
the builder in case of an IAE (CLI-177) or we can simply fix the tests
that use the builder by calling
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=163789projectId=114
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Sat 14 Mar 2009 07:33:59 -0700
Finished at: Sat 14 Mar 2009 07:34:56 -0700
Total time: 57s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
On 14/03/2009, bay...@apache.org bay...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Sat Mar 14 16:29:28 2009
New Revision: 754482
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=754482view=rev
Log:
Removing deprecated evaluateSet and translate methods [LANG-438]
Unfortunately a lot of the Javadoc
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:46 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/03/2009, bay...@apache.org bay...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Sat Mar 14 16:29:28 2009
New Revision: 754482
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=754482view=rev
Log:
Removing deprecated evaluateSet and
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=163889projectId=114
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 14 Mar 2009 10:32:20 -0700
Finished at: Sat 14 Mar 2009 10:33:01 -0700
Total time: 40s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
I'd like to add a TypeUtils to the reflect subpackage, to provide as much help
as possible for discovering type parameters of generic types. I recently
commented in ClassUtils that a 3.0, Java5-compatible assignable test should
assume autoboxing == true (since one would think the assignable
-Original Message-
From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabr...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 11:57 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
I'd like to add a TypeUtils to the reflect subpackage, to provide as much
help as possible for
--- On Sat, 3/14/09, Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com wrote:
From: Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
Subject: RE: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Saturday, March 14, 2009, 2:19 PM
-Original Message-
From:
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 4:52 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
On 14/03/2009, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Starting up a thread for cleanup discussions on Lang.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabr...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 12:36 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
--- On Sat, 3/14/09, Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com wrote:
From: Gary Gregory
I am -1 on removing the enums package. It's still a useful design
pattern even if Java 5 has native enum support. As one of the
responsers noted, and as do I, I have used Apache Enum extensively and
would not put the burden on developers to remove it just yet.
Deprecate the package for 3.0 and
Gary Gregory wrote:
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 4:52 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
And the various other backwards incompatible changes that people have
been requesting.
Paul Benedict wrote:
I am -1 on removing the enums package. It's still a useful design
pattern even if Java 5 has native enum support. As one of the
responsers noted, and as do I, I have used Apache Enum extensively and
would not put the burden on developers to remove it just yet.
Deprecate
May I repeat my proposal [1] to add some utility classes related to
concurrency?
Oliver
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg08095.html
Henri Yandell schrieb:
Starting up a thread for cleanup discussions on Lang.
I've removed the enum (was a blocker on JDK 5) and enums
Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
Hi Christian,
if Dennis has no time I can help out during Hackathon - I owe him one or
two favours already for maven-related help
If I can persuade my employer to let me go to ApacheCon, we could do it
together :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Christian
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by ChristianGrobmeier:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Compress
The comment on the change is:
modified everything to fit to new implementation,
+1
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all,
since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
on the old Jakarta template:
+1
2009/3/13 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
Hi all,
since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
on the old Jakarta template:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by ChristianGrobmeier:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CompressRoadmap
The comment on the change is:
added roadmap
New page:
##language:en
=
Btw - I've had a success organizing this kind of thing on a wiki page.
That worked very well for me with both Quartz work and Taglibs.
Thanks Hen, this is a good idea. I have added an wiki page too:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CompressRoadmap
Christian
Thanks Siegfried!
Hopefully you met up, have some beer, and bring compress to fly with
that maven stuff :-)
Cheers
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
siegfried.goes...@it20one.at wrote:
Hi Christian,
if Dennis has no time I can help out during Hackathon - I owe him one or
two
* Gump: I don't see compress here:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/apache-commons/index.html
Because you are looking at the wrong place 8-)
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-sandbox/index.html
thanks, that helped :-)
* Stefan wrote: I'd love to work on Zip64 support
Jorg, nothing is wrong with that. I missed that option. Thanks for
pointing it out.
Paul
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
May I repeat my proposal [1] to add some utility classes related to
concurrency?
Oliver
[1]
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by ChristianGrobmeier:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CompressRoadmap
The comment on the change is:
added issue number for zip64 support, changed
On 14/03/2009, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Gary Gregory wrote:
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 4:52 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
And the various
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Niall Pemberton
Process:
* Mail list if you want feedback to sanity check the idea. If it survives that:
* Open up a JIRA ticket, post the code as a patch, discuss :)
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'd like to add a TypeUtils to the reflect subpackage, to provide as
Sure. Split on a new thread, or if the previous thread ended up with
good concrete direction then make JIRA tickets and add patches. [Not
that you shouldn't commit... adding a patch on JIRA first seems to
work well for discussions].
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Oliver Heger
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:20 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/03/2009, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Gary Gregory wrote:
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 4:52 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
* Gump: I don't see compress here:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/apache-commons/index.html
Because you are looking at the wrong place 8-)
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-sandbox/index.html
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 1:29 PM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: RE: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
Gary Gregory wrote:
-Original Message-
From: sebb
Just in case anyone is sitting and wanting to do something on Lang and
not seeing the right thing to hit, LANG-396 has a good attachment from
Richard Wheeldon suggesting areas to apply varargs that needs someone
thinking about and sinking their teeth into.
Hen
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Gary Gregory
ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 1:29 PM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: RE: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
There'll be a lot of work in 3.0 I suspect. I'm going to pretend to
organize it, y'all willing.
= New JDK work done in most recent burst (r749101:r754602) =
* JDK 1.5 will be the targetted JVM.
* Deprecated code deleted.
* Enum, Enums, NestableExceptions and Random code moved to a
backcompat
My job responsibilities just recently involved converting 25K lines of
code to java 5. I can take on the varargs and generics stuff.
Paul
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
There'll be a lot of work in 3.0 I suspect. I'm going to pretend to
organize it,
StandardToStringStyle seems to have nothing in but super calls to
ToStringStyle. I'm thinking why?
Looks like it just needs to exist and have the serialID and maybe the
constructor. The rest of it is just noise.
Any +1s to deleting all that code, or am I missing something?
Hen
--- On Sat, 3/14/09, Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com wrote:
From: Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
Subject: RE: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Saturday, March 14, 2009, 2:39 PM
-Original Message-
Are we still using this branch? I created it for work on the reflect
subpackage but later merged back to trunk... :|
-Matt
--- On Sat, 3/14/09, s...@apache.org s...@apache.org wrote:
From: s...@apache.org s...@apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r754584 - in
45 matches
Mail list logo
