The idea is related to some classes in the concurrent package that
provide specific ways to create objects, e.g. lazy creation or creation
in a background thread. If there was a standard factory interface
implemented by these classes, client code could directly make use of
these enhanced
Hopefully 3 is a charm here - I have cut a third release candidate
and would like to reopen the release vote based on RC3. As
previously discussed, the only difference between 1.3 and 1.4 is
that the 1.3 sources have been filtered to exclude JDBC4 methods.
Here are the artifacts:
1.3 (JDBC 3)
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Hopefully 3 is a charm here - I have cut a third release candidate
and would like to reopen the release vote based on RC3. As
previously discussed, the only difference between 1.3 and 1.4 is
that the 1.3 sources have been filtered to exclude JDBC4 methods.
I don't know
Commons Proxy has an interface very much like the one you're
suggesting. I considered using Commons Functor's Function interface
instead.
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
The idea is related to some classes in the concurrent package that provide
Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Hopefully 3 is a charm here - I have cut a third release candidate
and would like to reopen the release vote based on RC3. As
previously discussed, the only difference between 1.3 and 1.4 is
that the 1.3 sources have been filtered to exclude
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Hopefully 3 is a charm here - I have cut a third release candidate
and would like to reopen the release vote based on RC3. As
previously discussed, the only difference between 1.3 and 1.4 is
that the 1.3 sources have been filtered to exclude JDBC4
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Hopefully 3 is a charm here - I have cut a third release candidate
and would like to reopen the release vote based on RC3. As
previously discussed, the only difference between 1.3 and 1.4 is
that the 1.3 sources have been
Missing file prevents site build. Another RC is necessary.
Phil
Phil Steitz wrote:
Hopefully 3 is a charm here - I have cut a third release candidate
and would like to reopen the release vote based on RC3. As
previously discussed, the only difference between 1.3 and 1.4 is
that the 1.3
True enough that [functor] already contains *Function interfaces that
meet these requirements.
-Matt
On Dec 26, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Unless [lang] would use it internally all over the place. Is there
a case for that? How is the interface useful without parameters?
Gary
