Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270705&projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 22:26:29 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 22:28:57 -0800
Total time: 2m 28s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270613&projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 18:13:47 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 18:16:41 -0800
Total time: 2m 53s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270632&projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 19:33:37 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 19:36:07 -0800
Total time: 2m 30s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270403&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 10:06:07 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 10:07:24 -0800
Total time: 1m 17s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270402&projectId=160
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 10:03:33 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 10:05:26 -0800
Total time: 1m 52s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270366&projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 09:11:39 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 09:14:13 -0800
Total time: 2m 33s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270361&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 08:59:09 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 09:00:39 -0800
Total time: 1m 29s
Build Trigger: Schedule
It's looking as if the problem with the Continuum test failures is
probably because the system is overloaded.
Perhaps it does not make sense to have such a short wait time, i.e. 100ms.
Maybe better to increase the time to (say) 500ms, and keep the hold
time at 2 * wait.
I'm going to try this to
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270335&projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 07:41:25 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 07:44:02 -0800
Total time: 2m 37s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270314&projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 06:10:35 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 06:13:40 -0800
Total time: 3m 5s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270307&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 05:59:08 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 06:00:51 -0800
Total time: 1m 43s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270280&projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 04:38:43 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 04:41:18 -0800
Total time: 2m 35s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270265&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 04:15:16 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 04:17:20 -0800
Total time: 2m 4s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270250&projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 03:41:05 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 03:43:58 -0800
Total time: 2m 52s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
sebb wrote:
> On 14/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 1/14/10, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> > On 14/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> > > Unless I am reading the output of the latest failures wrong or we
>> > > are picking up the wrong hashcode (should be innermost delegate),
>> >
>> > It's currently
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270227&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 02:53:51 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 02:55:21 -0800
Total time: 1m 29s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=270199&projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 02:02:07 -0800
Finished at: Fri 15 Jan 2010 02:05:08 -0800
Total time: 3m 1s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
Hello everyone!
I notice a problem using GenericObjectPool.
My code is like this:
Object obj = null;
try
{
obj = this.borrowObject();
}
catch(NoSuchElementException ex)
{
log.error("no such element exception", ex);
18 matches
Mail list logo