+1
2011/2/20 Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr:
Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_2_RC2/
Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/
Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/maven/
Documentation bundled with the binary
- Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com a écrit :
I'd like to see a 3.3; I think we have a branch that had a lot of
bugfixes on it before the 4.0 merge.
Perhaps a last version would help people who need long term maintenance of
production systems.
It seems at least some people still file Jira
I agree with Luc,
since the commons-collection is widely adopted by community, it has to
be maintained.
Have a nice day, all the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:30 AM, luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
- Henri Yandell
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
[Please refer to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-519
for the context of this discussion.]
Hi Luc.
Anyway, returning NaN or POSITIVE_INFINITY would work only with some
optimizers.
Do you mean that it would fail with some optimization _algorithms_ or some
unsafe _implementations_
On 20 February 2011 15:15, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_2_RC2/
Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/
Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/maven/
Documentation
Hi Gilles,
- Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org a écrit :
[Please refer to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-519
for the context of this discussion.]
Hi Luc.
Anyway, returning NaN or POSITIVE_INFINITY would work only with
some
optimizers.
Do you mean that
- sebb seb...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 20 February 2011 15:15, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr
wrote:
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_2_RC2/
Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/
Maven artifacts:
Hi Mikkel,
- Mikkel Meyer Andersen m...@mikl.dk a écrit :
Dear community,
I've started on implementing Kalman filter and have once again run
into a structural challenge in regards to matrix hierarchy (as with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-435 and
On 2/21/11 7:46 AM, sebb wrote:
On 20 February 2011 15:15, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_2_RC2/
Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/
Maven artifacts:
Hi.
[Please refer to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-519
for the context of this discussion.]
Hi Luc.
Anyway, returning NaN or POSITIVE_INFINITY would work only with
some
optimizers.
Do you mean that it would fail with some optimization _algorithms_ or
On Feb 21, 2011, at 3:31, luc.maison...@free.fr luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
- Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com a écrit :
I'd like to see a 3.3; I think we have a branch that had a lot of
bugfixes on it before the 4.0 merge.
Perhaps a last version would help people who need long
Hi.
[...]
Yes, but for simple bounds this would not be too much (using a logarithm or
exponential).
For double bounds, one typically uses a scaled logit function.
If this is the best choice, I'll implement a conversion class (for
the
simple bound case).
It is a simple
On 20 February 2011 21:58, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Sun Feb 20 21:58:19 2011
New Revision: 1072757
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072757view=rev
Log:
Fix typo in // comment.
Modified:
[...]
The things we will for sure have some difficult discussions are:
- dependencies
(I guess Phil and myself don't like dependencies, whereas Ted and Gilles
are happy with them)
My position is probably best summarized as follows:
1. I'm against dependencies for everything
2011/2/21 luc.maison...@free.fr:
Hi Mikkel,
- Mikkel Meyer Andersen m...@mikl.dk a écrit :
Dear community,
I've started on implementing Kalman filter and have once again run
into a structural challenge in regards to matrix hierarchy (as with
On 2/20/11 10:15 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_2_RC2/
Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/
Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/maven/
Documentation bundled with the binary
I've updated the test-jar.xml Ant script [1] so it can now be used to
run the test classes against a jar without needing to also compile
against the jar:
$ ant -f test-jar.xml [-lib junit-m.n..jar] test-only
Running this against a checkout of [3] gives 40 classes with test
errors or test
Le 21/02/2011 18:03, sebb a écrit :
I've updated the test-jar.xml Ant script [1] so it can now be used to
run the test classes against a jar without needing to also compile
against the jar:
$ ant -f test-jar.xml [-lib junit-m.n..jar] test-only
Running this against a checkout of [3] gives
This vote is cancelled.
There are some incompatible changes in RC2 in the user level interface
StepHandler, which were not detected by CLIRR.
I will prepare a new release quickly.
Luc
Le 20/02/2011 16:15, Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
Tag:
When testing using Java 1.5.0, I am seeing the following output:
Running org.apache.commons.math.util.FastMathStrictComparisonTest
double atan2(1.1102230246251565E-16, -1.7976931348623157E308) expected
400921fb54442d18 actual c00921fb54442d18 entries [9, 6]
double atan2(2.2250738585072014E-308,
On 21 February 2011 19:28, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 21/02/2011 18:03, sebb a écrit :
I've updated the test-jar.xml Ant script [1] so it can now be used to
run the test classes against a jar without needing to also compile
against the jar:
$ ant -f test-jar.xml [-lib
On 21 February 2011 19:32, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
This vote is cancelled.
There are some incompatible changes in RC2 in the user level interface
StepHandler, which were not detected by CLIRR.
I will prepare a new release quickly.
I suggest you wait a day or so - there
On 20 February 2011 16:12, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Salut Luc,
+0, checked with the following configurations and I didn't understand
why there are 10 tests more if run with JDK1.6.
FastMath is tested against all the methods found in StrictMath, and
there are 10
Le 21/02/2011 21:06, sebb a écrit :
On 21 February 2011 19:28, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 21/02/2011 18:03, sebb a écrit :
I've updated the test-jar.xml Ant script [1] so it can now be used to
run the test classes against a jar without needing to also compile
against the
Thanks for the explanation Seb, very appreciated!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:19 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 February 2011 16:12, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Salut Luc,
+0, checked with the
Hello guys,
I found that the class UnivariateRealSolverImpl in the package
'org.apache.commons.math.analysis.solvers' has been deprecated since version
2.2 of asf commons math project... However this change isn't reported in the
Clirr Report... Please look at this issue so as to be confirmed...
Hello guys,
I found out that the function 'calculateNumericalVariance()' in the class
'org.apache.commons.math.distribution.WeibullDistributionImpl' which has
been added since version 2.2 of asf commons math project has not been
recorded in the clirr report. I would be grateful if someone had a
Hello guys,
Looking at the clirr report i have noticed that for example in the class
'org.apache.commons.math.analysis.solvers.LaguerreSolver' some function with
the name 'solve(...)' have been added in the 2.2 version of the apache
commons math project... However in the javadoc of those
On 21 February 2011 20:03, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
When testing using Java 1.5.0, I am seeing the following output:
Running org.apache.commons.math.util.FastMathStrictComparisonTest
double atan2(1.1102230246251565E-16, -1.7976931348623157E308) expected
400921fb54442d18 actual
Hello guys,
In the clirr report of 2.2 version is mentioned that class
'org.apache.commons.math.exception.util.LocalizedFormats' has been added...
However in the javadoc of the very same class is stated: @since 2.1...
Please have a look at this issue so as to be confirmed that it is(n't) a
bug...
Le 21/02/2011 22:02, Michael Giannakopoulos a écrit :
Hello guys,
I found that the class UnivariateRealSolverImpl in the package
'org.apache.commons.math.analysis.solvers' has been deprecated since version
2.2 of asf commons math project... However this change isn't reported in the
Clirr
Le 21/02/2011 22:07, Michael Giannakopoulos a écrit :
Hello guys,
I found out that the function 'calculateNumericalVariance()' in the class
'org.apache.commons.math.distribution.WeibullDistributionImpl' which has
been added since version 2.2 of asf commons math project has not been
recorded
ping?
2011/1/27 David Karlsen davidkarl...@gmail.com
Any update to the status?
2011/1/19 Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Jacob Zwiers
jacob.zwi...@tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca wrote:
I'll echo that.
I had put a query to the user's list a last week
Le 21/02/2011 22:13, Michael Giannakopoulos a écrit :
Hello guys,
Looking at the clirr report i have noticed that for example in the class
'org.apache.commons.math.analysis.solvers.LaguerreSolver' some function with
the name 'solve(...)' have been added in the 2.2 version of the apache
Le 21/02/2011 22:25, Michael Giannakopoulos a écrit :
Hello guys,
In the clirr report of 2.2 version is mentioned that class
'org.apache.commons.math.exception.util.LocalizedFormats' has been added...
However in the javadoc of the very same class is stated: @since 2.1...
Please have a look
Le 21/02/2011 21:09, sebb a écrit :
On 21 February 2011 19:32, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
This vote is cancelled.
There are some incompatible changes in RC2 in the user level interface
StepHandler, which were not detected by CLIRR.
I will prepare a new release quickly.
I
Ready to help in any means that i can! (Can't wait!!!)
Best regards,
Giannakopoulos Michael
On 21 February 2011 22:13, mben...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mbenson
Date: Mon Feb 21 22:13:15 2011
New Revision: 1073169
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1073169view=rev
Log:
use svn:keywords and fix up @since tag
Modified:
Hello guys,
I have noticed that the clirr report mentions that method 'public double
getSparcity()' has been deprecated whereas method 'public double
getSparsity()' has been added... However in the class
'org.apache.commons.math.linear.OpenMapRealVector' the javadoc of the first
function doesn't
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:01 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 February 2011 22:13, mben...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mbenson
Date: Mon Feb 21 22:13:15 2011
New Revision: 1073169
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1073169view=rev
Log:
use svn:keywords and fix up @since tag
Thanks a lot for your answer Luc! Sorry for the trouble...
Michael Giannakopoulos
Hello guys,
Looking at the class 'org.apache.commons.math.linear.InvalidMatrixException'
i found out that the public constructor InvalidMatrixException(string,
Object[ ]) isn't deprecated something that i suppose it should be done
because we have already added (in this version [2.2]) a new
Thanks a lot for your answer Luc! Sorry for the trouble, i'll keep this in
mind...
Michael Giannakopoulos
Hello guys,
In the Clirr report is mentioned that the function
'MatrixIndexException(org.apache.commons.math.exception.util.Localizable,
java.lang.Object[])' has been added to the class
'org.apache.commons.math.linear.MatrixIndexException'... However the javadoc
doesn't comply with this change as
Thanks a lot for your answer Luc!
Giannakopoulos Michael
Hello guys,
I have noticed that clirr report mentions that method 'protected double
acceptStep(org.apache.commons.math.ode.sampling.AbstractStepInterpolator,
double[], double[], double)' and 'protected void
setStateInitialized(boolean)' have been added... However the javadoc for
those 2 functions
On 21 February 2011 22:10, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 21/02/2011 21:09, sebb a écrit :
On 21 February 2011 19:32, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
This vote is cancelled.
There are some incompatible changes in RC2 in the user level interface
StepHandler, which
On 21 February 2011 20:26, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 21/02/2011 21:06, sebb a écrit :
On 21 February 2011 19:28, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 21/02/2011 18:03, sebb a écrit :
I've updated the test-jar.xml Ant script [1] so it can now be used to
run the
-Original Message-
From: F Mue [mailto:webmas...@genealogie-konzepte.net]
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 08:38
To: Gary Gregory
Subject: Re: [codec] Testing Cologne Phonetic
Hi Gary,
I don't know if there is an implementation you can take as a reference.
I found two other
I really would love to have mahout-math have more in common with
commons math but there are likely some nasty conflicts in goals. What
mahout has needed up to now is fast evolution which has not been
possible with commons math because of the compatibility constraints
and because it is difficult to
Gmail f*cked me over:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [collections] retire or release?
To: Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
So to continue the 3.3 discussion, it looks like Hen created an RC1 nearly 2
years ago... :) But he also tagged the point just before the generics
branch was merged back to trunk. Shall we create a 3_X branch from this
tag?
Matt
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Matt Benson
Hello guys,
In this one clirr report mentions that method 'public void
clearObservations()' has been added, however the javadoc of this function in
this class doesn't have an @since 2.2 tag... Please have a look at this!
Thanks a lot and goodmorning!
Best regards,
Giannakopoulos Michael
Hello guys,
Clirr report mentions that method 'public void
setQRRankingThreshold(double)' has been added in this specific class but the
javadoc hasn't been updated so as to mention @since 2.2... Have a look at
this one please, and sorry if i have put you on trouble (i believe that this
way i help
Hi Matt,
Matt Benson wrote:
So to continue the 3.3 discussion, it looks like Hen created an RC1 nearly
2
years ago... :) But he also tagged the point just before the generics
branch was merged back to trunk. Shall we create a 3_X branch from this
tag?
I'd take the latter if it's still
58 matches
Mail list logo
