Re: [math] SimpleRegression

2011-08-13 Thread Greg Sterijevski
Also, I was thinking that maybe it might be useful to bring SimpleRegression into line with the other regression techniques and give the user the ability to constrain the constant to zero? -Greg On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Greg Sterijevski gsterijev...@gmail.comwrote: One more thing...

Re: [math] SimpleRegression

2011-08-13 Thread Phil Steitz
On 8/12/11 10:13 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote: One more thing... (ala Detective Colombo). In add and remove observation there is a snippet which looks like: sumXX += dx * dx * (double) n / (n + 1d); sumYY += dy * dy * (double) n / (n + 1d); sumXY += dx * dy

Re: [math] SimpleRegression

2011-08-13 Thread Phil Steitz
On 8/12/11 10:59 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote: Also, I was thinking that maybe it might be useful to bring SimpleRegression into line with the other regression techniques and give the user the ability to constrain the constant to zero? +1 - just make sure to include clear javadoc and tests.

Re: [math] SimpleRegression

2011-08-13 Thread Greg Sterijevski
As soon as you push the other changes, I will update my source and get to work on this... I thought SimpleRegression was a toy example, but after thinking about it, there is much to like about the class. -Greg On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/12/11

Re: [VOTE] Accept BSF as a Commons component

2011-08-13 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 13/08/2011 02:13, sebb a écrit : BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta. It's not really big enough to warrant its own TLP. IMO Commons would be a good alternative home for BSF. Can we please vote to: 1. Accept BSF as a Commons Component 2. Offer Commons karma to BSF developers. The ones

Re: [VOTE] Accept BSF as a Commons component

2011-08-13 Thread Christian Grobmeier
+1 to both votes On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:13 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta. It's not really big enough to warrant its own TLP. IMO Commons would be a good alternative home for BSF. Can we please vote to: 1. Accept BSF as a Commons Component 2.

Re: [sanselan] are these formats supported?

2011-08-13 Thread sebb
This is really a question for the Commons User list - please ask there. On 13 August 2011 10:06, bizso09 bizs...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm wondering if these formats are supported by Sanselan? Caption-Abstract @

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-08-13 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [VOTE] Accept BSF as a Commons component

2011-08-13 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 for both welcome to commons!!! http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: +1 to both votes On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:13 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: BSF [1] needs to move out of

Re: [VOTE] Accept BSF as a Commons component

2011-08-13 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 Gary On Aug 12, 2011, at 20:14, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta. It's not really big enough to warrant its own TLP. IMO Commons would be a good alternative home for BSF. Can we please vote to: 1. Accept BSF as a Commons Component 2. Offer

Re: [VOTE] Accept BSF as a Commons component

2011-08-13 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Am 13.08.2011 02:13, schrieb sebb: BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta. It's not really big enough to warrant its own TLP. IMO Commons would be a good alternative home for BSF. Can we please vote to: 1. Accept BSF as a Commons Component 2. Offer Commons karma to BSF developers.

Re: [VOTE] Accept BSF as a Commons component

2011-08-13 Thread James Carman
+1 On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: +1. On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for both sub-votes. Matt On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta. It's

Re: [jcs] groupId

2011-08-13 Thread James Carman
If you change stuff around, you need to change the package name(s), right? Otherwise, you could have collisions on the classpath. On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2011-08-12, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: IMHO unless the main

Re: [pool] and generics in a release

2011-08-13 Thread markt
Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All: Where are we WRT [pool] and generics in a release? Thank you, Gary -- http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ http://garygregory.com/ http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Re: [configuration] Steps towards next release

2011-08-13 Thread Ralph Goers
I was waiting for v 2.2 of the release plugin. It was released several weeks ago. As it happens I tried to do the release of vfs again last night and it failed due to changes in the commons parent pom or one of its parents. It doesn't appear to support multi module projects as the

Re: [configuration] Steps towards next release

2011-08-13 Thread Ralph Goers
Why is there no tag in svn for commons-parent version 21? On Aug 13, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: Hi, as you may have noticed, I have started some work in order to prepare a release (version 1.7) of [configuration]. I assume this will be the last release compatible with Java

Re: [jcs] groupId

2011-08-13 Thread sebb
On 13 August 2011 21:22, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: If you change stuff around, you need to change the package name(s), right?  Otherwise, you could have collisions on the classpath. Yes, but then everyone using the code will need to edit and recompile. So best to keep

Re: [configuration] Steps towards next release

2011-08-13 Thread sebb
Probably because the RC tag was not copied following the release vote. On 13 August 2011 22:30, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: Why is there no tag in svn for commons-parent version 21? On Aug 13, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: Hi, as you may have noticed, I have

Re: [codec] Generics added in a SVN branch

2011-08-13 Thread sebb
On 12 August 2011 20:56, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All: For a first cut at generics support in Codec, please checkout the branch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/branches/generics I wrote a migration guide in the root of the project called

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons Lang - Default Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)

2011-08-13 Thread Continuum@vmbuild
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=11233projectId=95 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Sun 14 Aug 2011 04:20:45 + Finished at: Sun 14 Aug 2011 04:21:53 + Total time: 1m 7s Build Trigger: Schedule

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons VFS - Default Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)

2011-08-13 Thread Continuum@vmbuild
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=11234projectId=129 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Sun 14 Aug 2011 05:20:55 + Finished at: Sun 14 Aug 2011 05:23:30 + Total time: 2m 34s Build Trigger: Schedule