To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue af
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Hi,
Le 27/03/2012 21:08, Matt Benson a écrit :
> I have to agree with James here. However, if the mysterious
> team-who-wishes-to-contribute is dead set on 6 month release cycles,
> it is certainly within their power to make sure 4.5 months ahead of
> time that every open JIRA issue has a patch a
Hello,
in preparation for 3.1, should we start the release notes anew?
Sébastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-collections4-testframework has an issue affecting its community
i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
I have to agree with James here. However, if the mysterious
team-who-wishes-to-contribute is dead set on 6 month release cycles,
it is certainly within their power to make sure 4.5 months ahead of
time that every open JIRA issue has a patch attached, and to nag the
team incessantly for the followi
I don't have a problem saying something like "we will attempt to
release at least twice per year." I don't think it would be wise to
say, "we will have a release on 1/1 and 7/1 every year."
Release early! Release often! Have 12 releases a year if you want.
Just don't promise them.
On Tue, Mar
Hello,
maybe we could mix both approaches.
Following James, releases could be feature-based, using the JIRA
system. If after 3 months, the goal is reached, we could release.
However, as Gilles suggested we could at least do our best to at least
try and release twice a year. This means that about
Still getting the strange test failure with the ant build I reported for
one of the previous RCs, but if nobody else sees this, it may well
depend on my specific configuration.
Otherwise, everything looks good, so +1
Oliver
Am 26.03.2012 17:38, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hello All:
This is a VOT
My +1,
Gary
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC4
>
> The changes from RC3 are:
> - IO-313: Add IOUTils.toBufferedReader(Reader)
> - IO-308: Allow applications to provide buffer (or size) for copyLarge
> methods.
> - I
+1
Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC4
>
> The changes from RC3 are:
> - IO-313: Add IOUTils.toBufferedReader(Reader)
> - IO-308: Allow applications to provide buffer (or size) for copyLarge
> methods.
> - IO-311: IOUtils.read(InputStream/Reader) i
As opposed to calendar-based release scheduling, I would suggest
perhaps using a more feature-based approach. For transparency, use
JIRA's target version (or whatever it's called) to schedule which
releases will contain fixes for which issues. The reason I'm hesitant
to put something on the calen
Hi.
> I am -1 to publishing any sort of release schedule to which we would
> be held accountable.
I was speaking for Commons Math. IMHO, it is a disservice to the project to
have releases more than 12 months apart, as it has just been the case.
This gives the feeling that the code is stable and i
I am -1 to publishing any sort of release schedule to which we would
be held accountable.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Hello.
>
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > But one question I would like to ask is what is the process for
>> > arranging for a new release of Commons-Math. I ask
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Curious, @Sebb is a new RC to change the release notes a must for you for a
+ 1?
Gary
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 26 March 2012 16:38, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hello All:
> >
> > This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC4
> >
> > The changes from RC3 are:
> > - IO-313: A
On 27 March 2012 13:18, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:50 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> 2012/3/27 "Detlef Günther" :
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so
>> that functions may be defined at runtime.
>> >
>> > Example for f(x):
>> >
Hello.
> > [...]
> >
> > But one question I would like to ask is what is the process for
> > arranging for a new release of Commons-Math. I ask because we have
> > 6-month release schedule for our mathematical and utility library, which
> > makes use of Commons Math, and we would like to see whet
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:50 AM, sebb wrote:
> 2012/3/27 "Detlef Günther" :
> > Hello,
> >
> > it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so
> that functions may be defined at runtime.
> >
> > Example for f(x):
> >
> > ExpInter ei = new ExpInter();
> > ei.setFunction("
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:53:25PM +0200, "Detlef Günther" wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > congrace may be used by writing a wrapper "Expression" to
> UnivarteFunction:
> >
> >
> > import org.apache.commons.mat
On Mar 27, 2012, at 5:55 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
>>
>> it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so that
>> functions may be defined at runtime.
>>
>> Example for f(x):
>>
>> ExpInter ei = new ExpInter();
>> ei.setFunction("ln(3*sin(2*x)+3)");
>> /
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:53:25PM +0200, "Detlef Günther" wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> congrace may be used by writing a wrapper "Expression" to UnivarteFunction:
>
>
> import org.apache.commons.math3.analysis.UnivariateFunction;
>
> import de.congrace.exp4j.Calculable;
> import de.congrace.exp4j.E
Hi Shiva,
both seem to do the same: remove and return the top element of the stack. Since
it is a stack the pop op should be the correct one.
Regards Detlef
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:11:16 +0530
> Von: Shiva Krishnan
> An: dev@commons.apache.org
> Betref
Hi to you!
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:09:01 +0530
> Von: Shiva Krishnan
> An: dev@commons.apache.org
> Betreff: [Collections] Difference between pop and remove
> Hi
--
NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!
Hi Thomas,
congrace may be used by writing a wrapper "Expression" to UnivarteFunction:
import org.apache.commons.math3.analysis.UnivariateFunction;
import de.congrace.exp4j.Calculable;
import de.congrace.exp4j.ExpressionBuilder;
public class Expression implements UnivariateFunction {
p
Hi
I am a newbie to this dev list. I was going through the ArrayStack.java
in Collections and couldn't understand the difference between remove and
pop methods. Can someone let me know about it ?
thanks
Shiva
Hello.
>
> it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so that
> functions may be defined at runtime.
>
> Example for f(x):
>
> ExpInter ei = new ExpInter();
> ei.setFunction("ln(3*sin(2*x)+3)");
> // Plot the function:
> for (double x=0.0;x<3.0;x+=0.1) {
>
2012/3/27 "Detlef Günther" :
> Hello,
>
> it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so that
> functions may be defined at runtime.
>
> Example for f(x):
>
> ExpInter ei = new ExpInter();
> ei.setFunction("ln(3*sin(2*x)+3)");
> // Plot the function:
> for (double x=0.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> 2012/3/27 "Detlef Günther"
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so
>> that functions may be defined at runtime.
>>
>
[snip]
ah something else I have found that looks quite interesting an
2012/3/27 "Detlef Günther"
> Hello,
>
> it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so
> that functions may be defined at runtime.
>
> Example for f(x):
>
> ExpInter ei = new ExpInter();
> ei.setFunction("ln(3*sin(2*x)+3)");
> // Plot the function:
> for (double x=0.0
Hello,
it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so that
functions may be defined at runtime.
Example for f(x):
ExpInter ei = new ExpInter();
ei.setFunction("ln(3*sin(2*x)+3)");
// Plot the function:
for (double x=0.0;x<3.0;x+=0.1) {
y = ei(x);
// ...
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
37 matches
Mail list logo
