Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Commons Pool 1.6-RC4

2012-06-16 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 6:39 PM, sebb wrote: > The tags/POOL_1_6 does not seem to have been created. > Ah, thank you for catching this. Done: svn copy https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_6_RC4/ https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_6 - m"

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.4-RC2

2012-06-16 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:52 PM, sebb wrote: > On 16 June 2012 20:38, Gary Gregory wrote: > > It's official: The Maven-Nexus is a pain in my you-know-what. > > > > All of the extra files (SHA, MD5, -bin, -src) must be deleted manually, > and > > I deleted one ASC file by mistake and I am getting

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.4-RC2

2012-06-16 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 5:32 PM, sebb wrote: > On 16 June 2012 22:28, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2012, at 16:53, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 16 June 2012 20:38, Gary Gregory wrote: > >>> It's official: The Maven-Nexus is a pain in my you-know-what. > >>> > >>> All of the extra files (SHA,

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-graph (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2012-06-16 Thread commons-graph development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jxpath (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jxpath has an issue affecting its community integration. This issu

Re: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-06-16 Thread Ralph Goers
On Jun 16, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > For now, I want @override so I am ok with 1.6 source but I is safe to > the have 1.5 target? Commons-io >=2.3 is not pressing for VFS. > > Gary Why would it not be? If that is all you are doing the @Override doesn't make it to the actual Class

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Commons Pool 1.6-RC4

2012-06-16 Thread sebb
The tags/POOL_1_6 does not seem to have been created. On 11 January 2012 18:52, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > This vote passes with 4 +1s from the PMC: > > Christian Grobmeier > Gary Gregory > Jörg Schaible > Oliver Heger > > Gary > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> G

[POOL] No download link for 1.5.7 but still in dist/ area

2012-06-16 Thread sebb
The POOL download page http://commons.apache.org/pool/download_pool.cgi only has a link for 1.6 (Java 1.5+) , although the dist/ area contains 1.6 and 1.5.7. Seems to me either the page should link to 1.5.7 (Java 1.3+) or the dist/ area should be tidied up. ---

Re: svn commit: r1351002 - /commons/proper/pool/branches/POOL_1_X/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericObjectPool.java

2012-06-16 Thread sebb
On 16 June 2012 23:09, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 16/06/2012 23:05, sebb wrote: >> On 16 June 2012 22:35, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 16/06/2012 22:33, sebb wrote: On 16 June 2012 22:23, Gary Gregory wrote: > Did you update the changes.xml? Did I miss that? No, I decided it was too

Re: svn commit: r1351002 - /commons/proper/pool/branches/POOL_1_X/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericObjectPool.java

2012-06-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 16/06/2012 23:05, sebb wrote: > On 16 June 2012 22:35, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 16/06/2012 22:33, sebb wrote: >>> On 16 June 2012 22:23, Gary Gregory wrote: Did you update the changes.xml? Did I miss that? >>> >>> No, I decided it was too trivial to warrant a mention. >>> But feel free to

Re: svn commit: r1351002 - /commons/proper/pool/branches/POOL_1_X/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericObjectPool.java

2012-06-16 Thread sebb
On 16 June 2012 22:35, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 16/06/2012 22:33, sebb wrote: >> On 16 June 2012 22:23, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> Did you update the changes.xml? Did I miss that? >> >> No, I decided it was too trivial to warrant a mention. >> But feel free to update changes.xml in both versions if y

Re: svn commit: r1351002 - /commons/proper/pool/branches/POOL_1_X/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericObjectPool.java

2012-06-16 Thread Gary Gregory
On Jun 16, 2012, at 17:34, sebb wrote: > On 16 June 2012 22:23, Gary Gregory wrote: >> Did you update the changes.xml? Did I miss that? > > No, I decided it was too trivial to warrant a mention. > But feel free to update changes.xml in both versions if you disagree. Check. Thanks for clarifying

Re: svn commit: r1351002 - /commons/proper/pool/branches/POOL_1_X/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericObjectPool.java

2012-06-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 16/06/2012 22:33, sebb wrote: > On 16 June 2012 22:23, Gary Gregory wrote: >> Did you update the changes.xml? Did I miss that? > > No, I decided it was too trivial to warrant a mention. > But feel free to update changes.xml in both versions if you disagree. It probably needs to be fixed in th

Re: svn commit: r1351002 - /commons/proper/pool/branches/POOL_1_X/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericObjectPool.java

2012-06-16 Thread sebb
On 16 June 2012 22:23, Gary Gregory wrote: > Did you update the changes.xml? Did I miss that? No, I decided it was too trivial to warrant a mention. But feel free to update changes.xml in both versions if you disagree. > Gary > > On Jun 16, 2012, at 16:57, "s...@apache.org" wrote: > >> Author:

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.4-RC2

2012-06-16 Thread sebb
On 16 June 2012 22:28, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Jun 16, 2012, at 16:53, sebb wrote: > >> On 16 June 2012 20:38, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> It's official: The Maven-Nexus is a pain in my you-know-what. >>> >>> All of the extra files (SHA, MD5, -bin, -src) must be deleted manually, and >>> I deleted

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.4-RC2

2012-06-16 Thread Gary Gregory
On Jun 16, 2012, at 16:53, sebb wrote: > On 16 June 2012 20:38, Gary Gregory wrote: >> It's official: The Maven-Nexus is a pain in my you-know-what. >> >> All of the extra files (SHA, MD5, -bin, -src) must be deleted manually, and >> I deleted one ASC file by mistake and I am getting an error re

Re: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-06-16 Thread Gary Gregory
For now, I want @override so I am ok with 1.6 source but I is safe to the have 1.5 target? Commons-io >=2.3 is not pressing for VFS. Gary On Jun 16, 2012, at 16:00, Ralph Goers wrote: > @Override is a compile annotation so we could have source be 1.6 and target > 1.5 for that. Do you have a p

Re: svn commit: r1351002 - /commons/proper/pool/branches/POOL_1_X/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericObjectPool.java

2012-06-16 Thread Gary Gregory
Did you update the changes.xml? Did I miss that? Gary On Jun 16, 2012, at 16:57, "s...@apache.org" wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Sat Jun 16 20:57:15 2012 > New Revision: 1351002 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1351002&view=rev > Log: > POOL-222 - bug in javadoc markup for GenericObjec

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.4-RC2

2012-06-16 Thread sebb
On 16 June 2012 20:38, Gary Gregory wrote: > It's official: The Maven-Nexus is a pain in my you-know-what. > > All of the extra files (SHA, MD5, -bin, -src) must be deleted manually, and > I deleted one ASC file by mistake and I am getting an error releasing from > Nexus: > >    -*Missing > Signa

Re: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-06-16 Thread Ralph Goers
@Override is a compile annotation so we could have source be 1.6 and target 1.5 for that. Do you have a pressing need to upgrade to commons-io 2.3? If that is a necessity than I am OK with upgrading to Java 6 for the target. IOW, I'm not in favor of upgrading just because "Java 5 is dead" but

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.4-RC2

2012-06-16 Thread Gary Gregory
It's official: The Maven-Nexus is a pain in my you-know-what. All of the extra files (SHA, MD5, -bin, -src) must be deleted manually, and I deleted one ASC file by mistake and I am getting an error releasing from Nexus: -*Missing Signature:*'/commons-io/commons-io/2.4/commons-io-2.4-sources.

Re: svn commit: r1348721 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/math3/linear/OpenMapRealVector.java test/java/org/apache/commons/math3/linear/SparseRealVectorTest.java

2012-06-16 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Gilles, and thanks for your time spent on this issue! 2012/6/16 Gilles Sadowski : >> [...] >> >> >> >> >> > Maybe that we could also impose that it is forbidden to divide by a >> >> > sparse >> >> > vector whose default value is zero. This will avoid a check on all >> >> > entries >> >> > (at

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.4-RC2

2012-06-16 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi James, Is your sonar using the same findbugs version as our POM? Are the settings different? Should we use the same settings commons-wide? Gary On Jun 16, 2012, at 11:58, James Carman wrote: > I got that from my personal sonar server > On Jun 16, 2012 8:43 AM, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > >> Hi

Re: [BeanUtils2] Thoughts about the API

2012-06-16 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 to James for both topics, let's start from a basic exception - naming proposals are welcome. I'll create the wiki page later after dinner - that WE is too much sunny to stay at home ;) best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.co

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.4-RC2

2012-06-16 Thread James Carman
I got that from my personal sonar server On Jun 16, 2012 8:43 AM, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > Hi James, > > I do not see your item on the report page > https://people.apache.org/builds/commons/commons-io/2.4/RC2/findbugs.html > > Are we talking about the same report? > > I am going to push the releas

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.4-RC2

2012-06-16 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi James, I do not see your item on the report page https://people.apache.org/builds/commons/commons-io/2.4/RC2/findbugs.html Are we talking about the same report? I am going to push the release along and if there is really an issue here we can fix it for the next go around. Release early, relea

Re: svn commit: r1348721 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/math3/linear/OpenMapRealVector.java test/java/org/apache/commons/math3/linear/SparseRealVectorTest.java

2012-06-16 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> [...] > > >> > >> > Maybe that we could also impose that it is forbidden to divide by a > >> > sparse > >> > vector whose default value is zero. This will avoid a check on all > >> > entries > >> > (at the expense of forbidding legitimate divisions, when all the entries > >> > have a non-defau

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx (in module commons-jelly) failed

2012-06-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration. T

Re: svn commit: r1348721 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/math3/linear/OpenMapRealVector.java test/java/org/apache/commons/math3/linear/SparseRealVectorTest.java

2012-06-16 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Gilles, 2012/6/16 Gilles Sadowski : > Hi. > >> >> >> >> > [...] >> >> > >> >> >> I fully agree. We could also opt for a less correct, but more >> >> >> efficient solution: we do not store the sign of zero, and return NaN >> >> >> each time v / zero occurs. The result should be NaN anyway, becau

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This