[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-io-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-lang3-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-lang3-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-chain2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbutils (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

UTF-8 encoding of Javadoc

2012-11-16 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hello, I think I've spotted the reason why the javadoc does not come out right with UTF-8 characters. Our pom.xml defines the following properties project.build.sourceEncodingUTF-8/project.build.sourceEncoding project.reporting.outputEncodingUTF-8/project.reporting.outputEncoding which should

[math] MATH-852

2012-11-16 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hello, As expected on such hot issues, it's difficult to arrive at a consensus among committers. However, I think that this ticket might be useful for contributors (or even committers, I would be first!). So the question is: what do we do about this ticket? Are there some more rules we would like

[math] UTF-8 encoding of Javadoc

2012-11-16 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Copy/paste of a previous message missing the [math] tag. Hello, I think I've spotted the reason why the javadoc does not come out right with UTF-8 characters. Our pom.xml defines the following properties project.build.sourceEncoding UTF-8/project.build.sourceEncoding

[All] Re: UTF-8 encoding of Javadoc

2012-11-16 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. I think I've spotted the reason why the javadoc does not come out right with UTF-8 characters. Our pom.xml defines the following properties project.build.sourceEncodingUTF-8/project.build.sourceEncoding project.reporting.outputEncodingUTF-8/project.reporting.outputEncoding which

Re: [math] MATH-852

2012-11-16 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 05:27:19PM +0100, Sébastien Brisard wrote: Hello, As expected on such hot issues, it's difficult to arrive at a consensus among committers. However, I think that this ticket might be useful for contributors (or even committers, I would be first!). So the question is:

Re: [All] Re: UTF-8 encoding of Javadoc

2012-11-16 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi, 2012/11/16 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org Hi. I think I've spotted the reason why the javadoc does not come out right with UTF-8 characters. Our pom.xml defines the following properties project.build.sourceEncodingUTF-8/project.build.sourceEncoding

Re: [math] MATH-852

2012-11-16 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Gilles, 2012/11/16 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 05:27:19PM +0100, Sébastien Brisard wrote: Hello, As expected on such hot issues, it's difficult to arrive at a consensus among committers. However, I think that this ticket might be useful for

Re: [All] Re: UTF-8 encoding of Javadoc

2012-11-16 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:09:13PM +0100, Sébastien Brisard wrote: Hi, 2012/11/16 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org Hi. I think I've spotted the reason why the javadoc does not come out right with UTF-8 characters. Our pom.xml defines the following properties

Re: [All] Re: UTF-8 encoding of Javadoc

2012-11-16 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Gilles, 2012/11/17 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:09:13PM +0100, Sébastien Brisard wrote: Hi, 2012/11/16 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org Hi. I think I've spotted the reason why the javadoc does not come out right

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

2012-11-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-16 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This