[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-26 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.11

2012-11-26 Thread luc
Le 2012-11-22 14:22, Mladen Turk a écrit : Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.11 based on RC1 is ready. Binaries and sources for testing are at [1], site can be found at [2]. Tag is [3] which will be renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_11 if voted. Please vote (vote will remain open for at least 72 hours).

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.11

2012-11-26 Thread sebb
On 22 November 2012 13:22, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote: Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.11 based on RC1 is ready. Binaries and sources for testing are at [1], site can be found at [2]. Tag is [3] which will be renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_11 if voted. Please vote (vote will remain open for

Re: Moving to svnpubsub for dist releases

2012-11-26 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 26/11/2012 01:01, sebb a écrit : Hope this all makes sense! Well, maybe I misunderstood, but committing the RC sites for review into a SVN repository seems a bit convoluted to me. A good old upload on people.apache.org was perfectly fine. Emmanuel Bourg smime.p7s Description: Signature

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-chain2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-26 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: Moving to svnpubsub for dist releases

2012-11-26 Thread sebb
On 26 November 2012 09:53, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote: Le 26/11/2012 01:01, sebb a écrit : Hope this all makes sense! Well, maybe I misunderstood, but committing the RC sites for review into a SVN repository seems a bit convoluted to me. A good old upload on people.apache.org

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-26 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbutils (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-26 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [math] Second thoughts on MATH-803 and zip-visitor for vectors.

2012-11-26 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 06:00:06PM +0100, Sébastien Brisard wrote: Hi, in MATH-803 [1] it was decided to deprecate RealVector.ebeMultiply/Divide, because these methods were difficult to support with sparse vectors. However, in MATH-870, we decided to deprecate sparse vectors altogether. I'm

Re: [math] Second thoughts on MATH-803 and zip-visitor for vectors.

2012-11-26 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi, 2012/11/26 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 06:00:06PM +0100, Sébastien Brisard wrote: Hi, in MATH-803 [1] it was decided to deprecate RealVector.ebeMultiply/Divide, because these methods were difficult to support with sparse vectors. However,

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-26 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.11

2012-11-26 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 then (tested X86 native build on Windows 7 with MS VS 2010) Gary On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote: On 11/25/2012 09:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: Is this something to worry about: Nope. .\..\..\apps\prunsrv\prunsrv.**c(317) : warning C4996:

Re: Moving to svnpubsub for dist releases

2012-11-26 Thread sebb
On 26 November 2012 11:24, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 November 2012 09:53, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote: Le 26/11/2012 01:01, sebb a écrit : Hope this all makes sense! Well, maybe I misunderstood, but committing the RC sites for review into a SVN repository seems a bit

Re: Moving to svnpubsub for dist releases

2012-11-26 Thread Ralph Goers
Traceability by who? PMC members can easily verify that what is committed to dist matches what they verified using what they downloaded and the MD5s that came with them. They are the ones responsible for the vote and the artifacts so I don't see a problem with that. Why you would need some

[VOTE] Release NET 3.2 based on RC1

2012-11-26 Thread sebb
This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.2 based on RC1. [ ] +1 release it [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care [ ] -1 no, do not release it because... tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_2_RC1/ (r1413727) site: http://people.apache.org/~sebb/net-3.2-RC1/ The

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.2 based on RC1

2012-11-26 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi, I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases? I understand that the removed methods are not in core classes but it still breaks BC. Are sure we want that? Are the removed methods confusing in a way that can be construed as keeping them being a bug? Gary On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.2 based on RC1

2012-11-26 Thread sebb
On 26 November 2012 19:08, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases? Yes. I understand that the removed methods are not in core classes but it still breaks BC. Are sure we want that? Are the removed methods confusing in a way

[math] Checking preconditions on package private functions

2012-11-26 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi, in classes Gamma and Beta, some functions are package private: - logGammaSum - logGammaMinusLogGammaSum (for lack of a better name) - bcorr These functions are meant to be used by other functions, like logBeta. Each of these functions have their own domain, and in logBeta, we make sure

Re: [math] Checking preconditions on package private functions

2012-11-26 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. in classes Gamma and Beta, some functions are package private: - logGammaSum - logGammaMinusLogGammaSum (for lack of a better name) - bcorr These functions are meant to be used by other functions, None of these functions seem to used. Am I missing something? Gilles like

Re: [math] Second thoughts on MATH-803 and zip-visitor for vectors.

2012-11-26 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. in MATH-803 [1] it was decided to deprecate RealVector.ebeMultiply/Divide, because these methods were difficult to support with sparse vectors. However, in MATH-870, we decided to deprecate sparse vectors altogether. I'm therefore having second thoughts on MATH-803. Since

Re: [math] Checking preconditions on package private functions

2012-11-26 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi, 2012/11/26 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org Hi. in classes Gamma and Beta, some functions are package private: - logGammaSum - logGammaMinusLogGammaSum (for lack of a better name) - bcorr These functions are meant to be used by other functions, None of these

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

2012-11-26 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-26 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This