Re: [CSV-96] Are we satisfied with the implemented solution?

2013-04-09 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2013/4/9 Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org Le 08/04/2013 22:07, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : I have run the PerformanceTest with each implementation 3 times and can not see any significant change in the performance. I ran my own performance test with Java 6 and Java 7, in client and server

Re: [CSV] Should the Builder API be optional?

2013-04-09 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2013/4/8 Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org Le 08/04/2013 22:39, Gary Gregory a écrit : But that's the price for immutability for some of these objects. Not sure, we already achieved immutability last year without paying this price:

Re: [CSV] Should the Builder API be optional?

2013-04-09 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2013/4/9 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com WRT org.apache.commons.csv.CSVFormat.CSVFormat(char, Character, Quote, Character, Character, boolean, boolean, String, String, String[]) There does not seem to be a good reason why this is not public. The only argument I've heard is that some

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Math 3.2 - RC5

2013-04-09 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Emmanuel, Le 07/04/2013 21:48, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : Le 07/04/2013 20:55, sebb a écrit : Is the Ant build file still needed? Yes, the Debian/Ubuntu package for Commons Math is built from the Ant file. Well, math3 is not packaged by Debian yet

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Math 3.2 - RC5

2013-04-09 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Luc, Well, math3 is not packaged by Debian yet (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689645). I packaged it last week, it's in the new package queue and should appear in the Debian repository soon. http://mentors.debian.net/package/commons-math3 Emmanuel Bourg smime.p7s

Re: [CSV] Should the Builder API be optional?

2013-04-09 Thread Adrian Crum
True. Users are free to create their own facade to make object construction easier. -Adrian On 4/9/2013 6:22 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: WRT org.apache.commons.csv.CSVFormat.CSVFormat(char, Character, Quote, Character, Character, boolean, boolean, String, String, String[]) There does not seem to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Math 3.2 - RC5

2013-04-09 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 09/04/2013 09:23, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : Hi Luc, Hi Emmanuel, Well, math3 is not packaged by Debian yet (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689645). I packaged it last week, it's in the new package queue and should appear in the Debian repository soon.

Re: [CSV] Should the Builder API be optional?

2013-04-09 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 09/04/2013 08:48, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : You're right, the old impl was already immutable. The problem was, that it was not possible for a CSVFormat to validate itself at construction time. We had to call the package private validate() method. I think we have been through this several

Re: [CSV] Should the Builder API be optional?

2013-04-09 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 09/04/2013 07:22, Gary Gregory a écrit : WRT org.apache.commons.csv.CSVFormat.CSVFormat(char, Character, Quote, Character, Character, boolean, boolean, String, String, String[]) There does not seem to be a good reason why this is not public. The only argument I've heard is that some

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Math 3.2 - RC5

2013-04-09 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 09/04/2013 09:47, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : Great! Many, many thanks. You're welcome. By the way, I should mention that the Debian Java maintainers team is open to anyone. Getting commit access is just a matter of asking on the list. The hard part is to get used to the tool chain. I'll happily

A proposal for Bug Commons IO/IO-354

2013-04-09 Thread Peter Liu
Hi, I'm new to Commons-IO, I wanna try a simple patch for the issuehttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-354?page=com.atlassian.jirafisheyeplugin:fisheye-issuepanel(IO-354) which had been analyzed carefully by reporter. as reporter described, due to contacting the chars directly, current

Re: A proposal for Bug Commons IO/IO-354

2013-04-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Peter, Thanks for contributing to apache commons! code snippets don't properly work in email messages, the best way to contribute code is by submitting patches, attaching them in JIRA issue - test cases are recommended! :) HTH, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/

Re: [math] next step

2013-04-09 Thread Phil Steitz
On 4/8/13 10:24 AM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:33:11 +0100, sebb wrote: On 8 April 2013 13:22, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:52:25 +0100, sebb wrote: On 8 April 2013 08:14, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: Hi Gary (and Sebb who had

[math] RealVector with visibility protected|public conflict

2013-04-09 Thread Arne Ploese
Hi, in class org.apache.commons.math3.linear.RealVector there is the embedded class Entry which is protected, but it is exposed by method public IteratorEntry iterator() ... My solution: 1. make class Entry public 2. make class RealVector implement IterableRealVectorEntry so one can do this:

[math] RealVector with visibility protected|public conflict

2013-04-09 Thread Arne Plöse
Hi, in class org.apache.commons.math3.linear.RealVector there is the embedded class Entry which is protected, but it is exposed by method public IteratorEntry iterator() ... My solution: 1. make class Entry public 2. make class RealVector implement IterableRealVectorEntry so one can do this:

Re: [math] next step

2013-04-09 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 04/09/2013 07:51 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 4/8/13 10:24 AM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:33:11 +0100, sebb wrote: On 8 April 2013 13:22, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:52:25 +0100, sebb wrote: On 8 April 2013 08:14, Luc Maisonobe