[Graph] the future of commons-graph and modularization

Hi all, mates, after a long while I haven't touched commons-graph, I had the opportunity to get influenced by some activities at my paid work that made me think twice on what as been already done in that component, and would like to bring new experiences in. So, what I still like about it: *

Re: [Graph] the future of commons-graph and modularization

Simone Tripodi kirjoitti 26.05.2013 18:35: Hi all, mates, after a long while I haven't touched commons-graph, I had the opportunity to get influenced by some activities at my paid work that made me think twice on what as been already done in that component, and would like to bring new

Re: [OT] git and svn properties

Hi Luc, Am 25.05.2013 21:53, schrieb Luc Maisonobe: Le 25/05/2013 21:16, Oliver Heger a écrit : Hi all, Hi Oliver, recently I switched from svn to git and now use git svn to do my commits. One problem I have with this setup is that git svn does not honor the autoprops configured for svn.

Re: [OT] git and svn properties

Or... We could switch from svn to git. I know, I know, I don't want to start another 1000 message long thread. ;) Gary On May 26, 2013, at 13:06, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote: Hi Luc, Am 25.05.2013 21:53, schrieb Luc Maisonobe: Le 25/05/2013 21:16, Oliver Heger a écrit :

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons Compress -

Group (shared) Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Continuum-Build-Host: vmbuild X-Continuum-Project-Id: 64 X-Continuum-Project-Name: Commons Compress Online report :

Re: [Graph] the future of commons-graph and modularization

Hi Rodion, Might the API look like this? [...] more or less :) Introducing kind of PathFinder interface, as main entry point for shortest path algorithms, but keeping the current chin builders - as you notice, `withEuristhic` makes sense for A* only, when current fluent interfaces drive users

Re: [OT] git and svn properties

Le 26/05/2013 19:53, Gary Gregory a écrit : Or... We could switch from svn to git. +1 from me. I have been using git for quite some time now and am particularly happy with it (well I was also happy when I switched from SCCS to RCS to CVS to SVN, and will probably also like what the next

Re: [Graph] the future of commons-graph and modularization

Hi Simone and all, good to see activity on commons-graph :-) I am currently using it for a research project in my lab, so hopefully I'll be able to come back with more feedback. In the meantime I agree with what you guys wrote so far. Cheers, Claudio On 26/05/2013 20:46, Simone Tripodi

Re: [OT] git and svn properties

In general, I like the simplicity of dealing with one jar. How big is it now? Gary On May 26, 2013, at 15:48, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote: Am 26.05.2013 21:39, schrieb Luc Maisonobe: Le 26/05/2013 19:53, Gary Gregory a écrit : Or... We could switch from svn to git. +1

Re: [Graph] the future of commons-graph and modularization

Hello Claudio! nice to read that commons-graph has a real production use case! :) So, don't worry about APIs breakage: as I mentioned, I'll prepare my proposal in a separated branch, so you can continue using the current codebase in your lab without breaking your build :P Thanks a lot, have a

Re: [OT] git and svn properties

Le 26/05/2013 19:53, Gary Gregory a écrit : Or... We could switch from svn to git. I know, I know, I don't want to start another 1000 message long thread. ;) No ! Not this can of worm ;) Emmanuel Bourg - To

Re: [parent][all] JaCoCo vs. Cobertura

So are we ready for a release 30? Gary On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.frwrote: Hi all, Le 23/05/2013 20:55, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : Le 23/05/2013 20:52, Gary Gregory a écrit : I think all this is addressed by the parent POM in trunk. Please check it