Go for it!
Send from my mobile device
Am 17.09.2013 um 22:40 schrieb Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com:
I propose that the [weaver] component [1] is ready for release. I am the
primary contributor to the code, but Mark Struberg also worked on the core
architecture. As soon as [weaver] is
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:04:21 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
[...]
What do you think?
I've never used this package, nor did I read much of its code;
but I trust his main developer to know how to bring improvements
into it.
Even if this is not likely the end of history, for this package as
well
Hmm... well, the typical usage profile for WeaveProcessor/CleanProcessor
would be that it is invoked by Maven or Ant, so I wouldn't usually (ever?)
expect an active SecurityManager in these contexts. That leaves custom
stuff, the nature of which I can't really begin to imagine having just
woken
+1, not that important for the first release build oriented but if
we extend the concept to runtimes it should be done but it is not that
easy since you need to take care of current context to know if you are
in a container or not and if you use right perms.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter:
My intention for runtime weaving would be to bootstrap the weave process in
another manner (I don't think cleaning is relevant to run time). The
processor module is described as defining the SPI and providing the
filesystem-based/build time infrastructure to invoke the service providers.
Does that
yep from my side
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/9/18 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com:
My intention for runtime weaving would be to bootstrap the weave
Le 18/09/2013 16:57, ggreg...@apache.org a écrit :
public MapString, Integer getHeaderMap() {
-return new LinkedHashMapString, Integer(this.headerMap);
+return this.headerMap == null ? null : new LinkedHashMapString,
Integer(this.headerMap);
}
Would it be
2013/9/18 Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org
Le 18/09/2013 16:57, ggreg...@apache.org a écrit :
public MapString, Integer getHeaderMap() {
-return new LinkedHashMapString, Integer(this.headerMap);
+return this.headerMap == null ? null : new
LinkedHashMapString,
Hello,
a while back I started this discussion on retrieving schema from file
names and the relation to VFSClassLoader (the reason beeing I cannot add a
directory scripts.jar/ to the VFSClassLoader because it always tries to
overlay the JAR Filesystem.
I have opened a JIRA for this, and
Hi,
At work, I needed to create an adapter for an existing class that has a
getter for a collection of objects. Now in my adapter I want to create a
getter for a collection of adapted objects.
I don't want to create a new list an add adapters for the contained objects
to it. I just want to create
Le 18/09/2013 21:32, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
Furthermore the contributor should be added to pom.xml and changes.xml.
Isn't this a bit far fetched for a one line NPE check?
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hello,
all over the VFS core and providers there are many places where code is
commented out. Most of the time it looks like it is old code, but
sometimes it also looks like suggested new implementations or even TODO
style of things.
I started to remove some of the places, especially
Hi Oliver,
don't you have to add Woonsan to the contributors section of pom.xml? Or is
that optional?
Benedikt
2013/9/18 ohe...@apache.org
Author: oheger
Date: Wed Sep 18 19:37:36 2013
New Revision: 1524542
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1524542
Log:
[LANG-893] Updated changes.xml.
Looks like a job for [functor].
Matt
On Sep 18, 2013 2:59 PM, Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
At work, I needed to create an adapter for an existing class that has a
getter for a collection of objects. Now in my adapter I want to create a
getter for a collection of adapted
2013/9/18 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Am 18.09.2013 22:02, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Oliver,
don't you have to add Woonsan to the contributors section of pom.xml? Or
is
that optional?
Benedikt
Well, I don't think there is a strict policy in place. Usually, I ask
Am 18.09.2013 22:02, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Oliver,
don't you have to add Woonsan to the contributors section of pom.xml? Or is
that optional?
Benedikt
Well, I don't think there is a strict policy in place. Usually, I ask
the contributor if he wants to be added to the list after a
2013/9/18 Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org
Le 18/09/2013 21:32, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
Furthermore the contributor should be added to pom.xml and changes.xml.
Isn't this a bit far fetched for a one line NPE check?
Just got the answer from Oliver on the other thread. I thought this is a
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 18/09/2013 21:32, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
Furthermore the contributor should be added to pom.xml and changes.xml.
Isn't this a bit far fetched for a one line NPE check?
I could see that changes.xml could have
True, maybe with EachElement and a Procedure [1], or maybe
IteratorToGeneratorAdapter, or something similar to the
ArrayListBackedAggregator and some custom function :) Or maybe with something
totally new.
[1] https://gist.github.com/kinow/6617618
From: Matt
19 matches
Mail list logo
