Re: [proxy]

2013-11-25 Thread sebb
On 25 November 2013 07:18, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hello guys, Maybe too early and I'm pretty I'll not get time to work on it in the following months but saw yesterday jdk8 contains asm repackaged: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/a40b0f51613b This could be

Re: [proxy]

2013-11-25 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Your initial statement is right however I don't get why we shouldn't do it. basically same applies for Unsafe which is used by all frameworks. I don't say we should drop spi to use it, just we should support it as a base when nothing is provided. IMO this would really simplify the setup of [proxy]

[math] Bessel functions

2013-11-25 Thread Brian Wignall
Hello, everyone. I am new and hoping to make my first contribution. I read through the Wish List, and I thought I could help quickly by starting with the special functions request. I created a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1066) that contains a patch for Bessel functions of

Re: [math] Bessel functions

2013-11-25 Thread Gilles
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:46:46 -0500, Brian Wignall wrote: Hello, everyone. I am new and hoping to make my first contribution. I read through the Wish List, and I thought I could help quickly by starting with the special functions request. Thanks for your interest in Commons Math.

Re: [SCXML] wiki updated, links on site broken

2013-11-25 Thread Woonsan Ko
Hi Bernd, Thanks a lot for finding the problems in the site! And, I hope you didn't lose too much time on the wiki page. :-) I created a task to correct broken links and others in the site: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-176 I will try to fix it from time to time with the issue.

Re: [proxy]

2013-11-25 Thread Matt Benson
It might be interesting to have a version of the ASM impl that could be available automatically in such an environment, yes. Matt On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote: Your initial statement is right however I don't get why we shouldn't do it.

Re: [math] Bessel functions

2013-11-25 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/25/13, 6:36 AM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:46:46 -0500, Brian Wignall wrote: Hello, everyone. I am new and hoping to make my first contribution. I read through the Wish List, and I thought I could help quickly by starting with the special functions request. Thanks for

Re: [beanutils] Preparing next release

2013-11-25 Thread Oliver Heger
Any updates here? Also, I would like to hear what others think about BEANUTILS-454 [1]. Thanks Oliver [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-454 Am 10.11.2013 22:36, schrieb Benedikt Ritter: Hello, I'm back from a conference week and I hope to find the time to have a look at

Re: [beanutils] Preparing next release

2013-11-25 Thread Paul Benedict
I have no problem with copying null to null. On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.dewrote: Any updates here? Also, I would like to hear what others think about BEANUTILS-454 [1]. Thanks Oliver [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-454 Am

RE: [jira] [Commented] (POOL-240) GKOP: invalidateObject does not unblock threads waiting in borrowObject

2013-11-25 Thread Gary Gregory
Are we getting a 2.0.1 for this fix? Gary Original message From: Phil Steitz (JIRA) j...@apache.org Date:11/25/2013 18:12 (GMT-05:00) To: iss...@commons.apache.org Subject: [jira] [Commented] (POOL-240) GKOP: invalidateObject does not unblock threads waiting in

Re: [jira] [Commented] (POOL-240) GKOP: invalidateObject does not unblock threads waiting in borrowObject

2013-11-25 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/25/13, 3:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: Are we getting a 2.0.1 for this fix? GKOP still needs to be fixed to resolve this and the GOP fix needs the TR part of CTR done carefully ;). I have started working on the tests and fix for GKOP. Phil Gary Original message From:

Re: [jira] [Commented] (POOL-240) GKOP: invalidateObject does not unblock threads waiting in borrowObject

2013-11-25 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/25/13, 3:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: Are we getting a 2.0.1 for this fix? GKOP still needs to be fixed to resolve this and the GOP fix needs the TR part of CTR done carefully ;). I have started working on the

Re: [math] Bessel functions

2013-11-25 Thread Brian Wignall
Thank you both, Gilles and Phil, for the warm welcome and for the detailed suggestions. It will take a little longer than I had anticipated to get this code up to standard, but I will keep at it. Nothing ahead looks too onerous; hopefully, soon it will be ready. Thank you again for your time and

Re: [VOTE] Release Imaging 1.0 from RC7

2013-11-25 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote: Hi Damjan, Hi Emmanuel I reviewed the API, here are my observations: Thank you. Firstly, we discussed several options before for the 1.0 release, and agreed that the contents of trunk would be quickly pushed out as 1.0

Re: [beanutils] Preparing next release

2013-11-25 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2013/11/25 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de Any updates here? Also, I would like to hear what others think about BEANUTILS-454 [1]. Sorry Oliver, I'm busy at the moment. I will not have time much time until mid december. And then there is christmas... :-) Thanks Oliver [1]

Re: [cli] Moving to Git?

2013-11-25 Thread Benedikt Ritter
I propose [1] as branching model. It looks very complicated at first, but I've found it very useful to always have a release ready version of the code in master. [1] http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ 2013/11/24 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org Let's give it a try. No