On 25 November 2013 07:18, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys,
Maybe too early and I'm pretty I'll not get time to work on it in the
following months but saw yesterday jdk8 contains asm repackaged:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/a40b0f51613b
This could be
Your initial statement is right however I don't get why we shouldn't
do it. basically same applies for Unsafe which is used by all
frameworks. I don't say we should drop spi to use it, just we should
support it as a base when nothing is provided. IMO this would really
simplify the setup of [proxy]
Hello, everyone.
I am new and hoping to make my first contribution. I read through the Wish
List, and I thought I could help quickly by starting with the special
functions request.
I created a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1066) that
contains a patch for Bessel functions of
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:46:46 -0500, Brian Wignall wrote:
Hello, everyone.
I am new and hoping to make my first contribution. I read through the
Wish
List, and I thought I could help quickly by starting with the special
functions request.
Thanks for your interest in Commons Math.
Hi Bernd,
Thanks a lot for finding the problems in the site!
And, I hope you didn't lose too much time on the wiki page. :-)
I created a task to correct broken links and others in the site:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-176
I will try to fix it from time to time with the issue.
It might be interesting to have a version of the ASM impl that could be
available automatically in such an environment, yes.
Matt
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Your initial statement is right however I don't get why we shouldn't
do it.
On 11/25/13, 6:36 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:46:46 -0500, Brian Wignall wrote:
Hello, everyone.
I am new and hoping to make my first contribution. I read through
the Wish
List, and I thought I could help quickly by starting with the
special
functions request.
Thanks for
Any updates here? Also, I would like to hear what others think about
BEANUTILS-454 [1].
Thanks
Oliver
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-454
Am 10.11.2013 22:36, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hello,
I'm back from a conference week and I hope to find the time to have a look at
I have no problem with copying null to null.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.dewrote:
Any updates here? Also, I would like to hear what others think about
BEANUTILS-454 [1].
Thanks
Oliver
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-454
Am
Are we getting a 2.0.1 for this fix?
Gary
Original message
From: Phil Steitz (JIRA) j...@apache.org
Date:11/25/2013 18:12 (GMT-05:00)
To: iss...@commons.apache.org
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (POOL-240) GKOP: invalidateObject does not
unblock threads waiting in
On 11/25/13, 3:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Are we getting a 2.0.1 for this fix?
GKOP still needs to be fixed to resolve this and the GOP fix needs
the TR part of CTR done carefully ;). I have started working on
the tests and fix for GKOP.
Phil
Gary
Original message
From:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/25/13, 3:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Are we getting a 2.0.1 for this fix?
GKOP still needs to be fixed to resolve this and the GOP fix needs
the TR part of CTR done carefully ;). I have started working on
the
Thank you both, Gilles and Phil, for the warm welcome and for the detailed
suggestions.
It will take a little longer than I had anticipated to get this code up to
standard, but I will keep at it. Nothing ahead looks too onerous;
hopefully, soon it will be ready.
Thank you again for your time and
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Damjan,
Hi Emmanuel
I reviewed the API, here are my observations:
Thank you.
Firstly, we discussed several options before for the 1.0 release, and
agreed that the contents of trunk would be quickly pushed out as 1.0
2013/11/25 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Any updates here? Also, I would like to hear what others think about
BEANUTILS-454 [1].
Sorry Oliver, I'm busy at the moment. I will not have time much time until
mid december. And then there is christmas... :-)
Thanks
Oliver
[1]
I propose [1] as branching model. It looks very complicated at first, but
I've found it very useful to always have a release ready version of the
code in master.
[1] http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
2013/11/24 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Let's give it a try. No
16 matches
Mail list logo