[LANG] Next steps

2014-01-02 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi all, I've successfully gone through my first release (wasn't as bad as I had expected it to be). I still have to do the Jira stuff, will do that tonight probably. So, here is what I have in mind for lang as next steps. Move User Guide from Website to package-info.java: The user guide is

[OGNL] big patches or lots of little patches?

2014-01-02 Thread Jason Pyeron
I am working OGNL-145 right now and it is a lot of work and a lot of changes. I think it is best to make the change in atomic chunks and to collect the lint patches up and apply them when done. What does the group think? -Jason -Original Message- From: Lukasz Lenart (JIRA) Sent:

[OGNL] Source for the org.apache.commons.ognl.ASTIn170531321268Accessor class

2014-01-02 Thread Jason Pyeron
I am trying to find the code generator for this dynamically generated class. Can someone point me in the right direction? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron

Re: [OGNL] big patches or lots of little patches?

2014-01-02 Thread Lukasz Lenart
The best is patch per JIRA issue IMHO - if there is more work to do with one issue, create subtasks to handle them 2014/1/2 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us: I am working OGNL-145 right now and it is a lot of work and a lot of changes. I think it is best to make the change in atomic chunks and

RE: [OGNL] big patches or lots of little patches?

2014-01-02 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: Lukasz Lenart Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 7:46 The best is patch per JIRA issue IMHO - if there is more work to do with one issue, create subtasks to handle them That is what I am doing for OGNL-145. Once I am sure the static state removals/changes

RE: [OGNL] Source for the org.apache.commons.ognl.ASTIn170531321268Accessor class

2014-01-02 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: Jason Pyeron Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 7:41 I am trying to find the code generator for this dynamically generated class. Generated code: org.apache.commons.ognl.OgnlOps.in( ($w) null, ($w) java.util.Arrays.asList( new Object[] { ($w) (true), ($w)

Re: [compress] 2.0: require Java7?

2014-01-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 01/01/2014 23:09, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : AFAIK maven uses some Plexus component which is yet another fork of the codebase originating from Ant - must have been created at about the same time as Compress. The forked code has been replaced in plexus-archiver 2.4 with a dependency on

Re: [compress] 2.0: require Java7?

2014-01-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2014-01-02, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 01/01/2014 23:09, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : AFAIK maven uses some Plexus component which is yet another fork of the codebase originating from Ant - must have been created at about the same time as Compress. The forked code has been replaced in

RE: [LANG] Next steps

2014-01-02 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 to it all.  Gary Original message From: Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Subject: [LANG] Next steps Hi all, I've successfully gone through my first release (wasn't as bad as I had

[LANG] Snap-shot version in website header

2014-01-02 Thread Duncan Jones
Hi all, The top of the commons-lang web page reads: Last Published: 01 January 2014 | Version: 3.3-SNAPSHOT Shouldn't that read: Last Published: 01 January 2014 | Version: 3.2 ?? Or are we changing the site between releases, thus necessitating that we build a site using the current

Re: [LANG] Next steps

2014-01-02 Thread Duncan Jones
On 2 January 2014 14:40, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: +1 to it all. Gary Original message From: Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Subject: [LANG] Next steps Hi all,

Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header

2014-01-02 Thread Gary Gregory
It's a constant problem. There is not much use having a SNAPSHOT site IMO, but it is the default behavior so to speak. Gary On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Duncan Jones dun...@wortharead.com wrote: Hi all, The top of the commons-lang web page reads: Last Published: 01 January 2014 |

Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header

2014-01-02 Thread sebb
On 2 January 2014 14:54, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: It's a constant problem. There is not much use having a SNAPSHOT site IMO, but it is the default behavior so to speak. That depends on the RM. It's perfectly possible to deploy the website from the tag instead of trunk. Gary

Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header

2014-01-02 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2014/1/2 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 2 January 2014 14:54, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: It's a constant problem. There is not much use having a SNAPSHOT site IMO, but it is the default behavior so to speak. That depends on the RM. It's perfectly possible to deploy the website

Re: [LANG] Next steps

2014-01-02 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2014/1/2 Duncan Jones djo...@cantab.net On 2 January 2014 14:40, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: +1 to it all. Gary Original message From: Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List

Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header

2014-01-02 Thread sebb
On 2 January 2014 15:38, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: 2014/1/2 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 2 January 2014 14:54, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: It's a constant problem. There is not much use having a SNAPSHOT site IMO, but it is the default behavior so to speak.

Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header

2014-01-02 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: 2014/1/2 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 2 January 2014 14:54, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: It's a constant problem. There is not much use having a SNAPSHOT site IMO, but it is the default behavior so to

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1

2014-01-02 Thread Gary Gregory
I am canceling this RC1 vote to deal with the issues brought up in the [VOTE] thread. Thank you to all of you who reviewed. Gary On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Gary Gregory ggreg...@apache.org wrote: Hello All: This is a VOTE to release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1 Feature and fix release.

Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header

2014-01-02 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:45 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 January 2014 15:38, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: 2014/1/2 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 2 January 2014 14:54, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: It's a constant problem. There is not much use having a

Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header

2014-01-02 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2014/1/2 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: 2014/1/2 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 2 January 2014 14:54, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: It's a constant problem. There is not much use having a SNAPSHOT

Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header

2014-01-02 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: 2014/1/2 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: 2014/1/2 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 2 January 2014 14:54, Gary Gregory

Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header

2014-01-02 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2014/1/2 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: 2014/1/2 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: 2014/1/2 sebb seb...@gmail.com

Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header

2014-01-02 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2014/1/2 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 2 January 2014 15:38, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: 2014/1/2 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 2 January 2014 14:54, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: It's a constant problem. There is not much use having a SNAPSHOT site IMO, but it is

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1

2014-01-02 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.dewrote: Gary Gregory wrote: [snip] This VOTE is open for at least 72 hours until December 23 2013 at 11:30 PM EST. Hmm. This date is difficult to match ;-) Oops, I'll get this right in RC2! Gary - Jörg

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1

2014-01-02 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: I assume what we are voting on is the tars / zips in the Nexus repo. Yes. I could not get the tests to run on Mac OSX (10.9.1). The Ant build fails with [junit] Testcase: testExecute took 0.013 sec [junit]

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1

2014-01-02 Thread sebb
On 2 January 2014 17:17, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: I assume what we are voting on is the tars / zips in the Nexus repo. Yes. I could not get the tests to run on Mac OSX (10.9.1). The Ant build

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1

2014-01-02 Thread sebb
On 2 January 2014 17:31, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 January 2014 17:17, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: I assume what we are voting on is the tars / zips in the Nexus repo. Yes. I could not get

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1

2014-01-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2014-01-02, Gary Gregory wrote: Sounds like an OS permission issue with executables. Can we use Maven to create the right file permissions for sh files in a tar/zip? Assuming you are using the assembly plugin, then the answer is yes:

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1

2014-01-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2014-01-02, sebb wrote: AFAIK zip does not support permissions. InfoZIP does and so does Ant (or Commons Compress ;-). Not sure about the assembly plugin but I'd assume it supports it as well. Stefan PS: permissions in ZIPs are the main reason I started to write the org.apache.tools.zip

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1

2014-01-02 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2014-01-02, Gary Gregory wrote: Sounds like an OS permission issue with executables. Can we use Maven to create the right file permissions for sh files in a tar/zip? Assuming you are using the assembly plugin,

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1

2014-01-02 Thread sebb
On 2 January 2014 18:28, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2014-01-02, Gary Gregory wrote: Sounds like an OS permission issue with executables. Can we use Maven to create the right file permissions for sh

[NET] Better name for getAddressCountLong() ?

2014-01-02 Thread sebb
There was a problem [1] with the getAddressCount() method - it returned an int, however the count of addresses could be larger than Integer.MAX_VALUE. To preserve binary compat, I added a new method long getAddressCountLong() However, I'm not entirely happy with the new name; it seems a bit long

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1

2014-01-02 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/2/14, 10:42 AM, sebb wrote: On 2 January 2014 18:28, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2014-01-02, Gary Gregory wrote: Sounds like an OS permission issue with executables. Can we use Maven to create

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1

2014-01-02 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/2/14, 9:17 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: I assume what we are voting on is the tars / zips in the Nexus repo. Yes. I could not get the tests to run on Mac OSX (10.9.1). The Ant build fails with [junit] Testcase:

Re: [NET] Better name for getAddressCountLong() ?

2014-01-02 Thread Gary Gregory
There is no good short name, unless you want to go with something like getAddressCountL(), yikes. For the 'normal' version 'AsType' is used somettimes: getAddressCountAsLong(). Or we could add a name that reflects the now corrected semantics, like getFullAddressCount(). Gary On Thu, Jan 2,

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1

2014-01-02 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 1/2/14, 10:42 AM, sebb wrote: On 2 January 2014 18:28, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2014-01-02, Gary Gregory wrote:

Re: [NET] Better name for getAddressCountLong() ?

2014-01-02 Thread Paul Benedict
There's nothing wrong with the name. Even the spec experts follow this convention. See methods getContentLength() vs getContentLengthLong(). tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.0-doc/servletapi/javax/servlet/ServletRequest.html On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [NET] Better name for getAddressCountLong() ?

2014-01-02 Thread sebb
OK, thanks, I'll leave it as is. On 2 January 2014 22:11, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote: There's nothing wrong with the name. Even the spec experts follow this convention. See methods getContentLength() vs getContentLengthLong().

[VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC2

2014-01-02 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello All: This is a VOTE to release Commons Exec 1.2-RC2 The changes from RC1 are: - Update the NOTICE.txt file fro 2014 - Update the source assembly to mark .sh files as executable. Feature and fix release. Requires a minimum of Java 1.3. The Apache Commons Exec team is pleased to announce

Re: [LANG] Next steps

2014-01-02 Thread Henri Yandell
Also +1 to all. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: +1 to it all. Gary Original message From: Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Subject:

Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header

2014-01-02 Thread Henri Yandell
Yes we change the site between releases. The bigger question is why we have a version number on the website, it isn't versioned. Hen On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Duncan Jones dun...@wortharead.com wrote: Hi all, The top of the commons-lang web page reads: Last Published: 01 January

Re: [LANG] Next steps

2014-01-02 Thread Henri Yandell
Better move quick on 3.2.1. Only bit I don't like about that is that it implies we shouldn't be committing anything that would lead us to want to have a 3.3. I'm +1 for calendar defined minor releases btw. I think we should be releasing monthly, if anyone has the energy to deal with the RMing :)