Github user gabrielruiu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/37
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Hi guys,
committed the site but buildbot seems to have some issues creating the
staging, any idea? svn.us and svn are now sync it seems with my commit
done yesterday night but buildbot didnt move to create the staging.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.w
Somehow I missed the mute button on the bulk change I just did for
DBCP issues. Apologies for the email flood
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@common
This vote has passed, with binding +1 votes from
Thomas Neidhart
Phil Steitz
Oliver Heger
and no other votes.
Thanks to all who helped with this release.
Phil
On 2/19/15 10:02 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Quite a few bugs have been fixed since DBCP 2.0.1 and a few new
> features have been added. I
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/46
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Music to my ears :-)
Gary
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just fyi: I have updated the minimum JDK requirements to 1.7 as there
> was at least agreement on this and no objections against it. We may
> still decide to further increase it to 1.8 later on.
>
> Thom
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:54:23 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I have already started to remove deprecated classes / methods in the
4.0
branch, but there are still some to be removed.
The remaining ones are non-trivial and I would like to ask the
developer
with the most experience in the res
Hi,
just fyi: I have updated the minimum JDK requirements to 1.7 as there
was at least agreement on this and no objections against it. We may
still decide to further increase it to 1.8 later on.
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
I have already started to remove deprecated classes / methods in the 4.0
branch, but there are still some to be removed.
The remaining ones are non-trivial and I would like to ask the developer
with the most experience in the respective packages to take a look and
do the changes.
It is mainl
Am 23.02.2015 um 21:35 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> Oliver Heger has raised concerns about this commit in JIRA [1]:
>
>> This is a strong change in the behavior of this class. The main property
> of atomic initializers was that they are non
>> blocking. Now a blocking wait has been introduced. Whe
Oliver Heger has raised concerns about this commit in JIRA [1]:
> This is a strong change in the behavior of this class. The main property
of atomic initializers was that they are non
> blocking. Now a blocking wait has been introduced. When there is so much
contention that the busy wait is
> actu
Nice!
2015-02-23 19:56 GMT+01:00 :
> Author: sebb
> Date: Mon Feb 23 18:56:18 2015
> New Revision: 1661745
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1661745
> Log:
> Clarify
>
> Modified:
> commons/cms-site/trunk/content/xdoc/site-publish.xml
>
> Modified: commons/cms-site/trunk/content/xdoc/site-publi
Thanks guys, will try to do it in the coming 2 days
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-02-23 19:45 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> On 23 February 2015 at 18:39, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> Hi Romain,
>>
>> 2015-02-23 1
On 23 February 2015 at 18:39, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi Romain,
>
> 2015-02-23 19:34 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> Is there any doc on how to publish a commons site without cms? Basically a
>> scp like would save me this time.
>>
>
> Have a look at [1]. You have build the sit
Hi Romain,
2015-02-23 19:34 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> Hi guys
>
> Is there any doc on how to publish a commons site without cms? Basically a
> scp like would save me this time.
>
Have a look at [1]. You have build the site locally and then add and commit
it to the SVN directory of the sit
Hi guys
Is there any doc on how to publish a commons site without cms? Basically a
scp like would save me this time.
Hi
Thanks for the note - clearle didnt think to it - but noone of previous
releases where i used this key passed so sounds fine.
Le 23 févr. 2015 18:53, "sebb" a écrit :
> On 20 February 2015 at 09:26, wrote:
> > Author: rmannibucau
> > Date: Fri Feb 20 09:26:12 2015
> > New Revision: 8065
> >
On 20 February 2015 at 09:26, wrote:
> Author: rmannibucau
> Date: Fri Feb 20 09:26:12 2015
> New Revision: 8065
>
> Log:
> updating my key
If you have ever signed a Commons release using the previous key then
it must be kept in the file.
i.e. rather than replacing an old key, add the new one.
On 23 February 2015 at 10:35, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Phil,
>
> 2015-02-22 21:43 GMT+01:00 :
>
>> Author: psteitz
>> Date: Sun Feb 22 20:43:30 2015
>> New Revision: 1661559
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1661559
>> Log:
>> Added (disabled) tests for JIRA: DBCP-283 and DBCP-284.
>>
>> Mod
On 20 February 2015 at 01:23, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On 19 February 2015 at 18:47, sebb wrote:
>> Not necessarily, my example was about requiring a major bump in JVM version.
>> Still binary compatible, but might require users to upgrade their host JVM.
>> Therefore it may be worth flagging
Le 23/02/2015 14:11, Dave Brosius a écrit :
> One specific case is that annotations are now coming in as annotations
> as opposed to unknown code attributes. Code that relies on parsing
> annotations thru unknown code attributes will break.
Thank you for the insight Dave, I'll add that to the rel
6.0 already has breaking changes, thus the move to version 6.0.
One specific case is that annotations are now coming in as annotations
as opposed to unknown code attributes. Code that relies on parsing
annotations thru unknown code attributes will break.
On 02/23/2015 07:30 AM, Ben McCann w
Ok, thanks. The part I wasn't sure about is if that was the only breaking
change. It sounds like you're saying the other changes aren't breaking.
-Ben
On Feb 22, 2015 11:14 PM, "Emmanuel Bourg" wrote:
> Le 23/02/2015 05:39, Ben McCann a écrit :
>
> > Are many of your changes breaking backward co
Hello Phil,
2015-02-22 21:43 GMT+01:00 :
> Author: psteitz
> Date: Sun Feb 22 20:43:30 2015
> New Revision: 1661559
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1661559
> Log:
> Added (disabled) tests for JIRA: DBCP-283 and DBCP-284.
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons
On 22/02/2015 22:27, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 02/22/2015 08:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 22/02/2015 16:07, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> unfortunately you have to ...I'm doing that at the moment as well for
>>> Maven site...
>>>
>>> already filed in an issue...
>>>
>>> https://is
25 matches
Mail list logo
