RE: [crypto] Logging dependency

>>Do I understand correctly that Crypto should fall back to JCE if native code >>could not be loaded? Yes, if "ENABLE_FALLBACK_ON_NATIVE_FAILED" is true(by default), it would fall back to JCE Regards Dapeng -Original Message- From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] Sent: Sat

Re: apache, commons, math

Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote: > > >> On Jun 19, 2016, at 10:40 AM, Jörg Schaible >> wrote: >> >> Hi Ralph, >> >> Ralph Goers wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Eric. >>> >>> I am OK with Commons Math being split into modules in the Commons Math >>> sub-project. >> >> >> That was my first idea too. But

[GitHub] commons-cli pull request #5: Skipping empty tests

GitHub user august782 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/5 Skipping empty tests This pull request adds @Ignore to tests with purposely left empty test bodies due to the features not being implemented (the @Test is added as well due to how JUnit proces

Re: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces supposed to be implemented or just used?

On 19 June 2016 at 15:08, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > My unterstanding of crypto is that those interfaces are not to be > implemented by Clients. OK, so does that mean that clients cannot provide their own implementations? > sebb schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2016 um 14:02: > >> On 19 June 2016 at 12:4

Re: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces supposed to be implemented or just used?

On 19 June 2016 at 18:57, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Being keen about API architectures ... > >> -Original Message- >> From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] >> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 07:08 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; a

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5

On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > this vote is canceled because of problems with the build. The RC can not be > build from the source archive and this is blocker. The necessary fixes have > already been applied to trunk, so I'm planning to create RC6 tomorrow. > A

Re: [JCS] Failing Tests in JCS Core

Now it's working again 8-) Romain Manni-Bucau schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2016 um 10:57: > Can check tomorrow but can it be the ip which is not localhost or ipv4? > Le 19 juin 2016 10:47, "Benedikt Ritter" a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > we have failing tests on Jenkins for JCS [1]. Does anybody know

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5

Hi, this vote is canceled because of problems with the build. The RC can not be build from the source archive and this is blocker. The necessary fixes have already been applied to trunk, so I'm planning to create RC6 tomorrow. Thank you for reviewing! Benedikt Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Sa., 18

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.12 based on RC2

Release notes typo: "Commons Compress 1.12 is the first version to require Java6 at runtime." "Java6" -> "Java 6" TODO: On file:///E:/temp/rc/commons-compress-1.12-src/target/site/limitations.html, you should remove the section on limitation for "Z". The "7Z" section also talks about old versions

Jenkins build is back to stable : commons-jcs #160

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to stable : commons-jcs » Apache Commons JCS :: Core #160

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5

On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello Oliver, > > Oliver Heger schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2016 > um 18:00 Uhr: > > > > > > > Am 19.06.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > > Hello Oliver, > > > > > > Oliver Heger schrieb am So., 19. Juni > > 2016 > > > um 17:43 Uhr

Re: Resign from PMC...

ACK. Per https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#emeritus, James has 72 hours to withdraw his resignation before I process it. Gary On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:36 PM, James Carman wrote: > I wish to resign from the Apache Commons PMC. Thank you. > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apac

Re: Resign from PMC...

Yep, I'm here. Father's day, preping a work demo for tomorrow... I'll follow up. Gary On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I am not sure if Gary saw this since it wasn’t sent to the PMC list. > > Ralph > > > On Jun 19, 2016, at 8:53 AM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > > > > James, >

Re: apache, commons, math

> On Jun 19, 2016, at 10:40 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > > Hi Ralph, > > Ralph Goers wrote: > >> Thanks, Eric. >> >> I am OK with Commons Math being split into modules in the Commons Math >> sub-project. > > > That was my first idea too. But if the collection of all submodules will in > the

Re: apache, commons, math

On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 19:40:34 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote: Thanks, Eric. I am OK with Commons Math being split into modules in the Commons Math sub-project. That was my first idea too. But if the collection of all submodules will in the end nevertheless only

RE: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces supposed to be implemented or just used?

Being keen about API architectures ... > -Original Message- > From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 07:08 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces > supposed to be implemented or just used?

Re: apache, commons, math

Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote: > Thanks, Eric. > > I am OK with Commons Math being split into modules in the Commons Math > sub-project. That was my first idea too. But if the collection of all submodules will in the end nevertheless only contain 20% of the code, we gained nothing. > I am not

Re: Resign from PMC...

I am not sure if Gary saw this since it wasn’t sent to the PMC list. Ralph > On Jun 19, 2016, at 8:53 AM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > > James, > > Am 19.06.2016 um 01:36 schrieb James Carman: >> I wish to resign from the Apache Commons PMC. Thank you. >> > > sorry to hear this. Would you mind t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5

+1 Am 18.06.2016 um 16:54 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: Hi, more then 10 years have passed since we've released BCEL 5.2. Users are waiting for us to release a new version capable of handling Java 6, 7 and 8 byte code. There have already been 4 release candidates for BCEL 6.0 but they have not made

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5

Hello Oliver, Oliver Heger schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2016 um 18:00 Uhr: > > > Am 19.06.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > Hello Oliver, > > > > Oliver Heger schrieb am So., 19. Juni > 2016 > > um 17:43 Uhr: > > > >> Build works fine with Java 1.7 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look >

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Hi Gilles, Gilles wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 01:55:12 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Hi Gilles, >> >> >> Gilles wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:00:34 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Gilles >> >> [snip] >> You can never go home. No project stays the same

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5

Hello Andrey, Andrey Loskutov schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2016 um 18:30 Uhr: > Hi, > > Thanks & congratulations to BCEL team! > > With this BCEL version all FB regression tests on both Java 8 and Java 9 > (as runtime) pass. Well done! > Thank you! > > If I could vote, I would vote +1. > You can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5

Hi, Thanks & congratulations to BCEL team! With this BCEL version all FB regression tests on both Java 8 and Java 9 (as runtime) pass. Well done! If I could vote, I would vote +1. P.S: Since we had this weekend also an official ASM 6 alpha release (see http://mail.ow2.org/wws/arc/asm/2016-06/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5

Am 19.06.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hello Oliver, > > Oliver Heger schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2016 > um 17:43 Uhr: > >> Build works fine with Java 1.7 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look >> good (there are a number of PMD and findbugs warnings, but I think this >> is acceptable)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5

Hello Oliver, Oliver Heger schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2016 um 17:43 Uhr: > Build works fine with Java 1.7 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look > good (there are a number of PMD and findbugs warnings, but I think this > is acceptable). > > However, I was not able to build the site locally because

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.12 based on RC2

Hello Stefan, - checked signs and hashes - compared archives - compared tag with src archive - build with Java 6 using Maven 3.2.5 Java 7 and 8 using Maven 3.3.9 Everything worked fine. +1 Benedikt Stefan Bodewig schrieb am Sa., 18. Juni 2016 um 18:12 Uhr: > Hi all > > as promised I've c

Re: Resign from PMC...

James, Am 19.06.2016 um 01:36 schrieb James Carman: > I wish to resign from the Apache Commons PMC. Thank you. > sorry to hear this. Would you mind telling us something about your reasons? - Of course, you don't have to if you don't want. Regards Oliver

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5

Build works fine with Java 1.7 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good (there are a number of PMD and findbugs warnings, but I think this is acceptable). However, I was not able to build the site locally because of: [ERROR] Could not find resource 'c:\data\dev\projects\OpenSource\bcel\bcel-6.

Re: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces supposed to be implemented or just used?

My unterstanding of crypto is that those interfaces are not to be implemented by Clients. sebb schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2016 um 14:02: > On 19 June 2016 at 12:44, Jochen Wiedmann > wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 12:49 PM, sebb wrote: > > > >> Use-only interfaces are much easier to evolve a

Re: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces supposed to be implemented or just used?

On 19 June 2016 at 12:44, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 12:49 PM, sebb wrote: > >> Use-only interfaces are much easier to evolve as methods can be added >> without affecting client code. > > That applies (IMO) only, if there is an abstract base class, and users > are actually d

Re: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces supposed to be implemented or just used?

On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 12:49 PM, sebb wrote: > Use-only interfaces are much easier to evolve as methods can be added > without affecting client code. That applies (IMO) only, if there is an abstract base class, and users are actually deriving from that. Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Do

[CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces supposed to be implemented or just used?

Some work has been done towards defining what is public and what is not. AFAIK, one aspect that has yet to be considered is whether the interfaces are designed for public use (or are just internal), and for public interfaces, are they intended for implementation or just for use? Use-only interfac

Re: [CRYPTO] Possible new method for CryptoCipher interface; API evolution

On 19 June 2016 at 01:18, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > I am not too keen to grow CryptoCipher to an abstract class (Java 8 or not) > with additional methods that would not typically be implemented by > implementing subclasses. > > The API of CC is quite low level, yes, but then adding higher level

Re: apache, commons, math

Thanks Eric for your view and great suggestions! I agree that more Commons-like codes that are easy enough to understand fit well here, and that more exotic interpolators etc are harder to get into, and would fit better in a mathematician-centric community (Incubator/TLP/Github organisation) with

Re: [JCS] Failing Tests in JCS Core

Can check tomorrow but can it be the ip which is not localhost or ipv4? Le 19 juin 2016 10:47, "Benedikt Ritter" a écrit : > Hi, > > we have failing tests on Jenkins for JCS [1]. Does anybody know what caused > this? > > Regards, > Benedikt > > [1] > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Apache%20Comm

[JCS] Failing Tests in JCS Core

Hi, we have failing tests on Jenkins for JCS [1]. Does anybody know what caused this? Regards, Benedikt [1] https://builds.apache.org/view/Apache%20Commons/job/commons-jcs/159/org.apache.commons$commons-jcs-core/console

[GitHub] commons-cli pull request #4: Removing unnecessary subclassing of DefaultPars...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/4 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e