RE: [CRYPTO]1.0.0 Release Plan

Hi all, Please let me know if there is any blocks need to be resolved before the release. Regards Dapeng -Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 6:48 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [CRYPTO]1.0.0 Release Plan On 28 June 2016 at

Re: Bug spot in commons-net-3.5

I just tried downloading a file using the FTPClientExample and it worked fine. Remember to set the binary transfer mode if necessary. 2016-07-07 20:45 GMT+01:00 MBCRAFT : > Hi! I spot a bug in commons-net-3.5 it seems that the ftp client misses > the last bytes on large

Re: Bug spot in commons-net-3.5

Hi Marco, Could you please provide unit test that demonstrates the problem? Gary 2016-07-07 12:45 GMT-07:00 MBCRAFT : > Hi! I spot a bug in commons-net-3.5 it seems that the ftp client > misses the last bytes on large downloaded files. > I did some tests with a 7 MB file,

Bug spot in commons-net-3.5

Hi! I spot a bug in commons-net-3.5 it seems that the ftp client misses the last bytes on large downloaded files. I did some tests with a 7 MB file, and it always missed the last kb. I've tried some quick fix, but i wasn't able to solve my problem. Kind regards -Marco B. --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7

Thank you Mark, I'll have a look ASAP. Mark Roberts schrieb am Do., 7. Juli 2016 um 18:41: > Unit test attached to BCEL-262. > > Mark > > > -Original Message- > > From: Gary Gregory [mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 2:26 PM > >

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7

Unit test attached to BCEL-262. Mark > -Original Message- > From: Gary Gregory [mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 2:26 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7 > > I think we should wait for your

[Compress] Apple FOSS its new codec

http://www.appleworld.today/blog/2016/7/6/apples-lzfse-compression-algorithm-goes-open-source Could be interesting to port to Java. The C source is in GitHub but no unit test AFAIK, I don't get that. Their tests must rely on some infra code they do not want to clean up and FOSS. Gary

Re: [Math] Getting things done

Hello Mike, michael.brzustow...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Math3 devs, > > Is there a consensus on the future of Math3? Definately. Not necessarily as Math3 for mid-term, since the plan was to establish a Math TLP with the code base of Math 3/4 minus the code for the three new components. > I