Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1

Hi Benedikt, An RC normally has a sry src and bin zips and tars. I usually test based on a src zip. Gary On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > a long time has passed since we released Apache Commons Lang 3.4. We fixed > quite a few bugs and

Re: [lang] changes.xml: add meaningful description for LANG-1200

Hello Pascal, no I think I'll be able to resolve the conflicts when I merge the release branch. Thank you!

Re: [lang] changes.xml: add meaningful description for LANG-1200

Hi Benedikt, sorry. Shall I revert the changes? -Pascal Am 02.10.2016 um 18:47 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: Hi Pascal, please don't modify changes.xml for 3.5. I've already created 3.5 RC1 and this will cause trouble when merging the release branch back to Master. Thank you Benedikt

Re: [lang] changes.xml: add meaningful description for LANG-1200

Hi Pascal, please don't modify changes.xml for 3.5. I've already created 3.5 RC1 and this will cause trouble when merging the release branch back to Master. Thank you Benedikt schrieb am So. 2. Okt. 2016 um 18:23: > Repository: commons-lang > Updated Branches: >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons EL moved to dormant

Hi, since no development has happened for a long while, the Apache Commons EL component has been moved to dormant. No further development is expected. Please refer to Commons EL successor which is developed at the Apache Tomcat project: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/el/

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1

Hi, a long time has passed since we released Apache Commons Lang 3.4. We fixed quite a few bugs and introduced some nice new features. For this reason, I'd like to call a vote for releasing Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1. Commons Lang 3.5 RC1 is available for review here:

Re: [RNG] modules vs projects

Hi. On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:48:29 +0100, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: Having all modules in the project have the same is just a convention. That's not what I've been told. Anyways, I agree that interdependent modules _of the same project_ should preferably share the same version number. It