Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1

2016-10-03 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello Gary, > > sorry I don't follow. What is wrong with > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/LANG_3_5_RC1 ? > My bad, I'll wait for RC2 to review. Gary > > Regards, > Benedikt > -- E-Mail:

[CANEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1

2016-10-03 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello, this vote is canceled, because the binary distribution contains SNAPSHOT jars. Thank you to Oliver Heger who catched this mess :-) I'll prepare RC2 ASAP. Benedikt Benedikt Ritter schrieb am So., 2. Okt. 2016 um 17:23 Uhr: > Hi, > > a long time has passed since we

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1

2016-10-03 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Oliver Heger schrieb am Mo., 3. Okt. 2016 um 17:50 Uhr: > Hi, > > the build works fine for me with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10, even > the site build is successful with Java 1.8. The artifacts and the site > look good. > > However, I found a problem with the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1

2016-10-03 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi, the build works fine for me with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10, even the site build is successful with Java 1.8. The artifacts and the site look good. However, I found a problem with the binary distribution: It contains two spurious jars versioned with 3.5-SNAPSHOT. I think this needs to be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1

2016-10-03 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 3/10/2016 à 16:36, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > This does work for me on Mac OS. Maybe it is related to the UTF-8 changes > we introduced a few day ago... If this is true, other Windows users should > have the same problems. Is this a -1 for you? No this isn't a -1, I don't think site

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1

2016-10-03 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Emmanuel, Emmanuel Bourg schrieb am Mo., 3. Okt. 2016 um 13:27 Uhr: > Hi Benedikt, > > I got an error when building the site on Windows 7 with Java 8u101: > > [INFO] Cobertura Report generation was successful. > [INFO] Generating "Checkstyle" report --- >

Re: [vfs] Wiki update for Manta VFS provider

2016-10-03 Thread ecki
Hello Elija, I can do that for you, let me know the wording and link you want to be included. Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net >From Win 10 Mobile Von: Elijah Zupancic Gesendet: Montag, 3. Oktober 2016 14:16 An: Commons Developers List Betreff: [vfs] Wiki update for Manta VFS provider

[vfs] Wiki update for Manta VFS provider

2016-10-03 Thread Elijah Zupancic
I just finished writing the first version of a VFS provider for the open source object store Manta (https://www.joyent.com/manta). I would like to add a line under "Related Projects" on the VFS Wiki for: https://github.com/joyent/commons-vfs-manta and I don't have access to make this change

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1

2016-10-03 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Benedikt, I got an error when building the site on Windows 7 with Java 8u101: [INFO] Cobertura Report generation was successful. [INFO] Generating "Checkstyle" report --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.15:checkstyle [INFO] There are 46 errors reported by Checkstyle 6.1.1 with

[jexl] 3.1 release review

2016-10-03 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, JEXL is ready for a new release, before creating the artifacts and starting the vote I'd like to ensure there is a consensus on the API changes. The version 3.1 has 3 incompatible changes that shouldn't have any impact on the users [1]. I plan to start the vote at the end of the week.

Re: Regressions in Commons Lang Unit tests when building on Java 9 EA

2016-10-03 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Dalibor, dalibor topic schrieb am Mi., 28. Sep. 2016 um 18:18 Uhr: > Hi, > > as Stefan suggests on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1265, I > think the behavior you've seen is related to > http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/252 . > > If changing the order to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1

2016-10-03 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
I guess just that its hashes were not in your vote email. Assuming dist.apache.org revision r16325 (as in your email), sha1 checksums: 9bc28bb93ec7d60f8d21e62c1d6b739d5884fdaa commons-lang3-3.5-bin.zip 5f71d781e86896403ba660a897241d093892322f commons-lang3-3.5-src.zip

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1

2016-10-03 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Gary, sorry I don't follow. What is wrong with https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/LANG_3_5_RC1 ? Regards, Benedikt