[GitHub] commons-text issue #58: Add tests

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/58 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/12601363) Coverage increased (+0.06%) to 98.222% when pulling

[GitHub] commons-text issue #58: Add tests

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/58 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/12601363) Coverage increased (+0.06%) to 98.222% when pulling

[GitHub] commons-text issue #58: Add tests

Github user TheRealHaui commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/58 You're welcome! Here we go regarding the exception detection code style. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

Re: [collections][proposal] Java 7

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > On Jul 27, 2017, at 12:53 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > We have not in the past forced a major version and Maven coordinate > change > > when updating the Java platform. We could do that

[GitHub] commons-text issue #59: add oraclejdk9 to travis configuration

Github user ameyjadiye commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/59 @chtompki , I'm testing same on my Commons Text fork , that shell file need a bit modification for Commons , will raise PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] commons-text issue #59: add oraclejdk9 to travis configuration

Github user PascalSchumacher commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/59 Looks like a very complex setup. But the actual travis report looks good: https://travis-ci.org/jacoco/jacoco/builds/255021437?utm_source=github_status_medium=notification

[GitHub] commons-text issue #59: add oraclejdk9 to travis configuration

Github user chtompki commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/59 Get a load of this: https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/blob/master/.travis.sh https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/blob/master/.travis.yml --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply

[GitHub] commons-text pull request #59: add oraclejdk9 to travis configuration

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/59 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] commons-text issue #59: add oraclejdk9 to travis configuration

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/59 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/12598637) Coverage remained the same at 98.163% when pulling

[GitHub] commons-text pull request #59: add oraclejdk9 to travis configuration

GitHub user PascalSchumacher opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/59 add oraclejdk9 to travis configuration add maven java9 profile: - use maven-javadoc-plugin version 3.0.0-M1, because versions below 3.0.0 do not work on java 9 - skip

[GitHub] commons-cli issue #15: CLI-217: Optional partial matching

Github user chtompki commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/15 I'll try to get to it today. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] commons-cli issue #15: CLI-217: Optional partial matching

Github user chtompki commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/15 I'll try to get to it today. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] commons-cli issue #15: CLI-217: Optional partial matching

Github user rubin55 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/15 @chtompki Any progress on this one? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] commons-cli issue #15: CLI-217: Optional partial matching

Github user rubin55 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/15 @chtompki Any progress on this one? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[Numbers] C99 (Was: [...] git commit: [NUMBERS-13] is closed.)

Hi. On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:34:48 -, ericbarnh...@apache.org wrote: NUMBERS-13: Complex() passes all tests and meets all the C99 standards. This issue is closed. Thanks for this work! :-) Do you think of adding some info (in Javadoc, or in a "User guide") about the new functionality

Re: [1/2] commons-numbers git commit: NUMBERS-13: atanh() passes all tests

Hi Eric. Changing 0 -> 0.0 is not necessary, and since the latter is less esthetically pleasing, why bother? And, as usual, we should avoid mixing different types of changes in the same commit. Regards, Gilles On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:34:47 -, ericbarnh...@apache.org wrote: Repository:

Re: [all/travis-ci] Regarding using ibmjava on travis

> On Jul 28, 2017, at 8:32 AM, Amey Jadiye wrote: > > Thanks, I'm taking Commons Text as my test guineapig for jacoco style > implementation , once confident in implementation we can move it to other > components. > Sounds good to me. > Regards, > Amey > >> On Jul

Re: [collections][proposal] Java 7

> On Jul 27, 2017, at 12:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have not in the past forced a major version and Maven coordinate change > when updating the Java platform. We could do that of course. I’m a tad surprised by this. It feels like updating the minimum accommodated

Re: [ALL] Moving view on builds.a.o

> On Jul 27, 2017, at 10:39 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > You don't have karma to use what in the UI? I do not see a "move" kind of > operation, only "new" ops. That’s a good question. I suppose that I’m not certain what I should be able to see vs what I shouldn’t in the

Re: [all/travis-ci] Regarding using ibmjava on travis

Thanks, I'm taking Commons Text as my test guineapig for jacoco style implementation , once confident in implementation we can move it to other components. Regards, Amey On Jul 28, 2017 5:39 PM, "Rob Tompkins" wrote: > > > On Jul 27, 2017, at 4:10 PM, Amey Jadiye

Re: [all/travis-ci] Regarding using ibmjava on travis

> On Jul 27, 2017, at 4:10 PM, Amey Jadiye wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > If this is still pending I would like to pickup this task. If docker is not > much helpful OR we need to wait for it I think we should try what jacoco > did. what do you think ? Sure. That makes sense to