+1
On 08/17/2017 11:15 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
+1
Looks good to me.
Gilles wrote:
Hello.
[Time for a new episode in our "Ripping CM" series.]
How about creating "Commons Geometry"?
The rationale is comprised of the usual suspects:
* Smaller and more focused component, hence:
- C
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 18:00:54 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Aug 18, 2017 16:10, "Gilles" wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:46:11 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Gilles
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:21:45 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:50 PM,
On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 14:44:09 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Gilles
wrote:
How about creating "Commons Geometry"?
Honestly: There are other subprojects (Vfs comes to mind), which are
perfectly able to produce a set of jar file without adding to the
list
of j
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Gilles wrote:
> How about creating "Commons Geometry"?
Honestly: There are other subprojects (Vfs comes to mind), which are
perfectly able to produce a set of jar file without adding to the list
of jar files for every one. Why do you require a new subproject?
Gi
