On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 15:35:14 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote:
What would you do with FieldElement and in particular
FieldElement.getField()?
I was thinking of a new interface to represent the "field"
concept:
---CUT---
/**
* @param Type of field element.
*/
public interface MathField {
T add(
Mac OS X 10.13.2: Maven 3.5.0, java 1.8.0_152 - "mvn clean site” worked both
times I ran it (granted I added "-Xmx4g -Xms1g").
Mac OS X 10.13.2: Maven 3.5.0, java 1.7.0_80 - "mvn clean site” works.
Site looks appropriate, minor nits with the site you provided: (1) coverage
seems low, (2) Some fi
Great Rob, TY!
Gary
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> I can do a validation in 2 hours from now.
>
> > On Dec 23, 2017, at 4:31 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Sergio and Jörg! Anyone else?
> >
> > I am especially curious if anyone will encounter issues with ra
I can do a validation in 2 hours from now.
> On Dec 23, 2017, at 4:31 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Thank you Sergio and Jörg! Anyone else?
>
> I am especially curious if anyone will encounter issues with randomly
> failing tests/builds on various platforms.
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 a
Thank you Sergio and Jörg! Anyone else?
I am especially curious if anyone will encounter issues with randomly
failing tests/builds on various platforms.
Gary
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Works fine for me building from source with my compiler zoo from Java 1
What would you do with FieldElement and in particular
FieldElement.getField()?
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Gilles
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Sorry for not replying earlier (and the top-post).
>
> I've a bad feeling about "Field" and "FieldElement" as
> they exist in "Commons Math".
> I'd like to
The Apache Commons RDF team is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Commons RDF 0.5.0.
Commons RDF aims to provide a common library for RDF 1.1 that could be
implemented by systems on the Java Virtual Machine.
The Apache Commons RDF distribution includes bindings for different
implementation
The Apache Commons RDF team is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Commons RDF 0.5.0.
Commons RDF aims to provide a common library for RDF 1.1 that could be
implemented by systems on the Java Virtual Machine.
The Apache Commons RDF distribution includes bindings for different
implementation
Am Sat, 23 Dec 2017 09:06:41 +0100 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
> Hi Jorg,
>
> It doesnt break IDE support but has some "dead" code from my
> understanding,
> no?
OK, I should have checked it myself. I got Oliver wrong and thought it contains
only cruft, but the cruft is only
additional ;-)
In
On 2017-12-22, Gary Gregory wrote:
> When can we get a [compress] release? It would be nice to get Zstandard out
> there.
It's incomplete as it is read-only and adding write support would be as
trivial as adding read-only support has been. It's only a matter of
finding tme to do it.
In addition
Github user kinow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/30
Looking good. I'm still just reluctant to add the new test dependency. So
leaving it here for now until others have time to chime in.
I'm updating merge requests now, merging what can b
Github user kinow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/6
Code looking good. Wonder if it would be feasible to add a test? What do
you think @mgmechanics ? Not sure if worth/useful/possible to test that
`Integer.MAX_VALUE`...
Thanks for the pu
Github user kinow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/5
Looks like the code from the pull request and the code in the master branch
have moved into too different directions, and it can't be updated any longer.
@mgmechanics let me know if you
Github user kinow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/4
I think from your description you have a valid use case for handling the
encoding yourself, instead of letting the library use ISO-8859-1 only.
I started to rebase the branch locally, wh
Github user kinow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/32
Added an extra commit to include the license header.
Thanks for your contribution @testingsavvy . Pull request merged.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/32
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Github user kinow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/33
Thank you **a lot** for including tests, and making the change so simple to
be reviewed. No extra formatting, or any other change :-)
Had a look at the code in Eclipse and also at the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/33
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Hi Jorg,
It doesnt break IDE support but has some "dead" code from my understanding,
no?
Le 23 déc. 2017 02:33, "Jörg Schaible" a écrit :
> Hi Gary,
>
> Am Fri, 22 Dec 2017 12:34:13 -0700 schrieb Gary Gregory:
>
> > Hi Jörg,
> >
> > Thank you for taking the time to review.
> >
> > The -sources
19 matches
Mail list logo