Re: Build failed in Jenkins: commons-validator #61

I think this has happened before. Jenkins now needs Java 8. It attempts recovery but that does not work. On 13 March 2018 at 16:17, Gary Gregory wrote: > Thoughts on how to fix this? > > Gary > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Apache Jenkins Server

Re: [LAZY][VOTE] Release Commons Parent 45 based on RC1.

On 13 March 2018 at 22:59, Gary Gregory wrote: > I am looking for a sanity check from other community members... just in > case ;-) One reason we can use a lazy vote for CP is that it is completely optional. If it turns out to be broken, we just stop using it. This is

Re: [LAZY][VOTE] Release Commons Parent 45 based on RC1.

I am looking for a sanity check from other community members... just in case ;-) Gary On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:49 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > Hello all, > > This is a [LAZY][VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Parent 45 (from RC1). > [Pardon my miss in commons-parent-44-RC3,

Re: [parent][release-plugin] One to release the other

Yes. I did. Although, it plays mor strangely with the parent people project than others because I don’t want to have some properties declared by default. The idea there is to have the up version into 45 be non-breaking if that is the only change that is made. > On Mar 13, 2018, at 3:47 PM,

[parent][release-plugin] One to release the other

Hi Rob, When you RC and release the parent POM, do you use your new Maven release plugin? Gary

Re: [Statistics] Port codes from Commons Math

Hello Devs, Thanks Gilles and Eric for guidance. I have cloned the Commons repos and forked the Common's Stat repo. Is it possible to make pull requests to that repo to be reviewed? Or should I follow a specific method? By referring the API docs I got some idea of the separation of modules. In

Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: commons-validator #61

Thoughts on how to fix this? Gary -- Forwarded message - From: Apache Jenkins Server Date: Tue, Mar 13, 2018, 09:48 Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: commons-validator #61 To: See

Github usage Was: [Statistics] Port codes from Commons Math

> On Mar 13, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Gilles wrote: > > > I didn't find it very easy to cooperate with developers who fork on GitHub > and submit PRs. I've now found the "git" command that creates a branch from a > PR, but it would be so much more comfortable to just

Re: [Statistics] Port codes from Commons Math

Hello. On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:25:19 +0100, Eric Barnhill wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Gilles wrote: Where can we find the old code before port into new Commons components? The code bases are managed by the "git" software; the whole history

Re: [Statistics]Port codes from Commons Math

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Gilles wrote: > >> >> Where can we find the old code before port into new Commons components? >> > > The code bases are managed by the "git" software; the whole history is > available: >