> On Apr 21, 2018, at 7:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 16:29 Gilles wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 14:15:08 +, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> I see commons-geometry-core below.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
On Sat, Apr
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 16:29 Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 14:15:08 +, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I see commons-geometry-core below.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 06:22 Rob Tompkins wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > On Apr 19, 2018,
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 14:15:08 +, Gary Gregory wrote:
I see commons-geometry-core below.
Gary
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 06:22 Rob Tompkins wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2018, at 7:42 PM, Gilles
wrote:
>
> For what it's worth:
>
> $ mvn site
I opened an infra ticket [1] to find out our options here. My preferred
option would be to migrate all of Commons over to gitbox for consistency.
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16413
On 21 April 2018 at 12:23, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018,
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 11:20 AM Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 21, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Oliver Heger
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 20.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb Matt Sicker:
> >> Wow, us "legacy" projects really need to keep up to date with these
>
> On Apr 21, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Oliver Heger
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 20.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb Matt Sicker:
>> Wow, us "legacy" projects really need to keep up to date with these
>> requirements. GitBox, no CMS (I think we're using svnpubsub everywhere, but
>>
Am 20.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb Matt Sicker:
> Wow, us "legacy" projects really need to keep up to date with these
> requirements. GitBox, no CMS (I think we're using svnpubsub everywhere, but
> this could also use gitpubsub with an asf-site branch), etc.
Would it reduce overhead if we converted
I see commons-geometry-core below.
Gary
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 06:22 Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 19, 2018, at 7:42 PM, Gilles
> wrote:
> >
> > For what it's worth:
> >
> > $ mvn site site:stage
>
> Curious what project you’re working in?
> On Apr 19, 2018, at 7:42 PM, Gilles wrote:
>
> For what it's worth:
>
> $ mvn site site:stage
Curious what project you’re working in? I would bet that it’s probably one
that’s multimode as japicmp doesn’t do well with pom modules.
>
> * succeeds with CP 43