Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 10/06/2019 18:05, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 18:33, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 10/06/2019 17:18, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:56, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 10/06/2019 16:34, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Hi. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 18:33, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 10/06/2019 17:18, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:56, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> > >> On 10/06/2019 16:34, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> Hello. > >>> > >>> Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 10/06/2019 17:18, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:56, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 10/06/2019 16:34, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 10/06/2019 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: P.S. Thinking of releasing 1.3? Not yet.

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Hello. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 10/06/2019 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> P.S. Thinking of releasing 1.3? > >> Not yet. I think there are a few outstanding items that work together > >> for the multi-threaded focus of the new code and the new generators:

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 10/06/2019 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: P.S. Thinking of releasing 1.3? Not yet. I think there are a few outstanding items that work together for the multi-threaded focus of the new code and the new generators: Sure but some of them could be postponed, if just to RERO. - RNG-98:

Re: [geometry] GEOMETRY-57

Hi Gilles, On 10.06.19 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 15:24, Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : Hi, based on my analyzing for the build get running I found that some constructors (BigFraction) in numbers are private. So I have create a branch GEOMETRY-57 which fixes

Re: [geometry] GEOMETRY-57

Hi. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 15:24, Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : > > Hi, > > based on my analyzing for the build get running I found that some > constructors (BigFraction) in numbers are private. > > So I have create a branch GEOMETRY-57 which fixes the issue and builds > with most recent state

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Hello. LGTM. Thanks, Gilles P.S. Thinking of releasing 1.3? Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 14:55, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I've submitted a PR with the functionality discussed in this thread for > JumpableUniformRandomProvider [1]. > > Some notes: > > - The jump must return a copy. > > This

[geometry] GEOMETRY-57

Hi, based on my analyzing for the build get running I found that some constructors (BigFraction) in numbers are private. So I have create a branch GEOMETRY-57 which fixes the issue and builds with most recent state of master of commons-numbers without any issue. Please review. The problem at

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

I've submitted a PR with the functionality discussed in this thread for JumpableUniformRandomProvider [1]. Some notes: - The jump must return a copy. This requires a bit of code all the way up to the base implementations of IntProvider and LongProvider to copy the current state. I've done

Re: [commons-geometry] 01/01: [GEOMETRY-56] - Create distribution archive

Hi. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 14:08, a écrit : > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > khmarbaise pushed a commit to branch GEOMETRY-56 > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-geometry.git > > commit 31c7de116e328632bb23f28ab5b637ee9e9d838e >