Re: [numbers-fraction] Documentation of fractions' reduction to lowest terms

2019-07-02 Thread Heinrich Bohne
Agreed, but it's not clear to me that it must be part of the public API. Yes, I admit that the public API doesn't really have anything to do with this, I realize that now. If my last email suggested otherwise, this was unintentional. On 7/1/19 11:52 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. Le lun.

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.0 RC2

2019-07-02 Thread Mark Thomas
The following votes were cast: Binding: +1: ggregory, markt, chtompki, stain Non-binding: +1: Jonathan Gallimore No other votes were cast. The vote therefore passes. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. Mark On 28/06/2019 15:20, Mark Thomas wrote: > It has been ~18 months

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Text 1.7 based on RC1

2019-07-02 Thread Gary Gregory
My +1 Gary On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 10:28 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons Text 1.6 was released, so I would like to release > Apache Commons Text 1.7. > > Apache Commons Text 1.7 RC1 is available for review

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.0 RC2

2019-07-02 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
My vote: +1 (binding) Verified: +1 sha512 sha256 +1 asc / KEYS +1 src zip vs tar.gz +1 bin zip vs tar.gz vs jar +1 src vs git (missing in src: README.md CONTRIBUTING.md; whitespace differences in commons-daemon-1.2.0-native-src) +1 mvn repo vs dist +1 mvn

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.0 RC2

2019-07-02 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
+1, thanks for the release! Jon On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 3:21 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > It has been ~18 months since the last Commons Daemon release. After the > recent flurry of activity and a couple of failed RCs, it is time for > another release vote. > > Notable changes since 1.1.0 include: >

Re: [configuration] review for PR 30

2019-07-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 02/07/2019 à 01:59, Gary Gregory a écrit : > What would you call the method? I don't know, setPropertyDirectInternal? It's private anyway, the name isn't important. Emmanuel Bourg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: