Re: [codec][parent] javadoc on JDK 11 requires

> On 25 Jul 2019, at 21:22, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 4:19 PM Alex Herbert > > wrote: > >> >> >>> On 25 Jul 2019, at 20:31, Gary Gregory >> > wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:27 PM Alex Herbert

Re: [codec][parent] javadoc on JDK 11 requires

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 4:19 PM Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > On 25 Jul 2019, at 20:31, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:27 PM Alex Herbert > > > wrote: > > > >> > >> On 25/07/2019 17:15, Gary Gregory wrote: > >>> So we should really fix

Re: [codec][parent] javadoc on JDK 11 requires

> On 25 Jul 2019, at 20:31, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:27 PM Alex Herbert > > wrote: > >> >> On 25/07/2019 17:15, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> So we should really fix this in parent 49 and release it, right? >> >> The fix is a one liner.

Re: [codec][parent] javadoc on JDK 11 requires

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:27 PM Alex Herbert wrote: > > On 25/07/2019 17:15, Gary Gregory wrote: > > So we should really fix this in parent 49 and release it, right? > > The fix is a one liner. I can push to parent the fix. Locally this works > if I install 49-SNAPSHOT and use it in [codec]. >

Re: [codec][parent] javadoc on JDK 11 requires

On 25/07/2019 17:15, Gary Gregory wrote: So we should really fix this in parent 49 and release it, right? The fix is a one liner. I can push to parent the fix. Locally this works if I install 49-SNAPSHOT and use it in [codec]. To get it into downstream projects would require they all

Re: [codec][parent] javadoc on JDK 11 requires

So we should really fix this in parent 49 and release it, right? Gary On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:59 AM Alex Herbert wrote: > There is a PR outstanding for [codec] that fails on JDK 11 for the > javadoc build [1]. > > It's not related to the PR but because the javadoc tool on JDK 11 is > strict

[codec][parent] javadoc on JDK 11 requires

There is a PR outstanding for [codec] that fails on JDK 11 for the javadoc build [1]. It's not related to the PR but because the javadoc tool on JDK 11 is strict about documenting code from the 'unamed' module. This can be fixed with the tag in the javadoc plugin:   maven-javadoc-plugin  

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.7.0 based on RC1

We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons Pool 2.6.2 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Pool 2.7.0. Apache Commons Pool 2.7.0 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/2.7.0-RC1