[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Numbers (full distribution) 1.0-beta1 based on RC1

This VOTE passes with the following +1 binding votes: * Gilles Sadowski * Bruno Kinoshita * Alex Herbert I will proceed with the release and send the announcement 24 hours after it is complete. Thank you all, Matt J

Re: [Geometry] Build fails on Jenkins

It looks like the issue is related to the dist-archive module. A while ago, I used the approach from commons-rng and included the dist-archive module under the "release" profile. However, the dist-archive build requires "mvn site" to be run before or as part of the build (as indicated in the

Re: [Geometry][Math] Equivalent of CM's "RotationConvention"

Hi Gilles, I removed the RotationConvention enum from commons-geometry because it was more confusing than useful. Instead, I specified [1] that commons-geometry uses "active rotations" by convention (equivalent to RotationConvention.VECTOR_OPERATOR). If users want to use the equivalent of

Re: [numbers] Continued Fraction

> On 6 Apr 2020, at 17:38, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello Alex. > > Thanks a lot for your always-detailed investigations... :-) > > Le lun. 6 avr. 2020 à 13:09, Alex Herbert > a écrit : >> >> The ContinuedFraction class required that an implementation

[Geometry][Math] Equivalent of CM's "RotationConvention"

Hello. Is there a way to replace an argument of CM's type "RotationConvention"[1] with a type from [Geometry]? Thanks, Gilles [1]

Re: [numbers] Continued Fraction

Hello Alex. Thanks a lot for your always-detailed investigations... :-) Le lun. 6 avr. 2020 à 13:09, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > The ContinuedFraction class required that an implementation provide a > and b coefficients of the form: > > * b1 > * a0 + -- > *

[numbers] Continued Fraction

The ContinuedFraction class required that an implementation provide a and b coefficients of the form:  *  b1  * a0 + --  *  a1 +  b2  *   -  *   a2 +    b3  *     *    a3 + ... I added this form to