+1
Building package from src zip. SHA512 ok.
Same environment for me as RC1, double checked I could build Windows
binaries.
Apache RAT check ok
JapiCmp ok
Gary
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021, 11:04 Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Reviewed. All looks good.
>
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> -Rob
>
> > On Jan 20, 2021, at
Hi Gilles,
I've updated the PR with the new module/package names.
> I don't see the link between "(not) extensible" and "enum": Extensibility is
> provided by API (which classes are public and meant to be reused, e.g. by
> custom IO code) while the "enum" defines the file formats that are
Le mer. 20 janv. 2021 à 22:42, Matt Juntunen
a écrit :
>
> Hi Gilles,
>
> > package "io" does not belong in "core".
>
> Ah, yes. I'd like to keep the core and euclidean IO modules separate since
> I'm picturing a spherical IO module later on down the road. In that case,
> perhaps we could just
Hi Gilles,
> package "io" does not belong in "core".
Ah, yes. I'd like to keep the core and euclidean IO modules separate since I'm
picturing a spherical IO module later on down the road. In that case, perhaps
we could just put the "io" portion of the module/package name before everything
Reviewed. All looks good.
+1
Cheers,
-Rob
> On Jan 20, 2021, at 10:52 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 18/01/2021 17:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> We have fixed a couple of bugs and a regression in 1.2.3, so I would
>> like to release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.4.
>
>
>
>> Please review the
On 18/01/2021 17:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
> We have fixed a couple of bugs and a regression in 1.2.3, so I would
> like to release Apache Commons Daemon 1.2.4.
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now.
>
> [X] +1 Release these
Hi Matt.
Le mer. 20 janv. 2021 à 05:03, Matt Juntunen
a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> I've created GEOMETRY-115 and an associated PR [1] containing new modules for
> IO functionality. The new modules are
>
> * commons-geometry-core-io - Common space-independent interfaces and
> classes
> *
Hello.
Le mer. 20 janv. 2021 à 11:11, Avijit Basak a écrit :
>
> Hello Gilles Sadowski
>
> Thanks for your reply. Yes I intend to contribute to enhancement
> of the GA functionality as per the JIRA (MATH-1563) proposal.
My proposal was to first create a new component (and, thus,
Hello Gilles Sadowski
Thanks for your reply. Yes I intend to contribute to enhancement
of the GA functionality as per the JIRA (MATH-1563) proposal. If I find any
other changes suitable I would also propose the same. Could you kindly look
into the approval process for this JIRA.
Thanks
