Re: Can we put together some sort of contributors guide for release requesters?

2021-07-09 Thread Gary Gregory
See also https://commons.apache.org/releases/index.html Gary On Fri, Jul 9, 2021, 19:02 Matt Sicker wrote: > Yes, and that’s one thing that can be in the guide. Anyone at Apache can > commit here. If there are users who want to step up and do release > management, they could perhaps shadow with

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.11.0 based on RC1

2021-07-09 Thread Gary Gregory
We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons IO 2.10.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO 2.11.0. Apache Commons IO 2.11.0 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.11.0-RC1 (svn revision 48762) T

Re: Can we put together some sort of contributors guide for release requesters?

2021-07-09 Thread Matt Sicker
Yes, and that’s one thing that can be in the guide. Anyone at Apache can commit here. If there are users who want to step up and do release management, they could perhaps shadow with someone else a few times before becoming a committer. On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 16:20 Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Matt,

Re: Can we put together some sort of contributors guide for release requesters?

2021-07-09 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Matt, Il Ven 9 Lug 2021, 18:25 Matt Sicker ha scritto: > There seems to be an increased interest from users around making > releases of various components in order to clean up their security > checklists mandated from above. Since making releases is somewhat > standardized here, would it make se

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.21 based on RC1

2021-07-09 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 Release notes: "Compress 1.20 now at least requires Java 8 to build and run." should mention 1.21, not 1.20. Building from the source zip using the Maven default goal with the following platforms: *clean package apache-rat:check japicmp:cmp javadoc:javadoc* Apache Maven 3.8.1 (05c21c65bdfed

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.21 based on RC1

2021-07-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2021-07-09, Gary Gregory wrote: > "Details of changes since 1.19 are in the release notes:" > 1.19 -> 1.20 ;-) fortunately only the vote mail is wrong. It even is true, in a way, the release notes even include all changes since 1.0. :-) Stefan --

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.21 based on RC1

2021-07-09 Thread Gary Gregory
"Details of changes since 1.19 are in the release notes:" 1.19 -> 1.20 ;-) Gary On Fri, Jul 9, 2021, 13:29 Stefan Bodewig wrote: > It's been way too long since the last relase and the number of resolved > issues is huge. > > Compress 1.21 RC1 is available for review here: > https://dist.ap

[VOTE] Release Compress 1.21 based on RC1

2021-07-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
It's been way too long since the last relase and the number of resolved issues is huge. Compress 1.21 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/compress/ (svn revision 48755) The tag is here: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-compres

Can we put together some sort of contributors guide for release requesters?

2021-07-09 Thread Matt Sicker
There seems to be an increased interest from users around making releases of various components in order to clean up their security checklists mandated from above. Since making releases is somewhat standardized here, would it make sense to create some sort of guide for volunteers who want releases

Re: [numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-09 Thread Alex Herbert
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 at 11:55, Matt Juntunen wrote: > If there aren't any objections, then I could try to get a release ready > this weekend. I believe we are skipping the commons-numbers-arrays and > commons-numbers-complex-streams modules for this release, correct? > > Thanks. Definitely omit co

Re: [numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-09 Thread Matt Juntunen
If there aren't any objections, then I could try to get a release ready this weekend. I believe we are skipping the commons-numbers-arrays and commons-numbers-complex-streams modules for this release, correct? -Matt J On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:17 PM Matt Juntunen wrote: > Hello, > > Are we ready