Re: [DISCUSS] - Move commons-chain to dormant?

2023-10-21 Thread Gary Gregory
Seems reasonable to me. Gary On Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 6:49 PM sebb wrote: > Reviving this thread. > > I think we should now change chain to dormant. > > Sebb > > On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 at 16:10, Pascal Schumacher > wrote: > > > > Looks like Apache Tiles 3 does not use commons-chain. > > > > The only

Re: [ALL] anyone use #apache-commons IRC channel on irc.freenode.org?

2023-10-21 Thread Gary Gregory
I avoid IRC, too painful to use. Gary On Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 7:15 PM sebb wrote: > Build-Plugin adds a link to > #apache-commons IRC channel on irc.freenode.org > > Do we still use IRC, and if so, is it on freenode.org? > > Sebb > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.15.0 based on RC1

2023-10-21 Thread Bruno Kinoshita
[x] +1 Release these artifacts Site reports look OK, checked some files in dist area, building fine on Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0) Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.8.5 Java version: 17.0.8.1, vendor: Private Build, runtime: /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64

Re: [ALL] anyone use #apache-commons IRC channel on irc.freenode.org?

2023-10-21 Thread Bruno Kinoshita
I haven't logged in to FreeNode for a long time. Been monitoring our ASF channels on Slack more nowadays. Cheers On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 01:15, sebb wrote: > Build-Plugin adds a link to > #apache-commons IRC channel on irc.freenode.org > > Do we still use IRC, and if so, is it on freenode.org?

[ALL] anyone use #apache-commons IRC channel on irc.freenode.org?

2023-10-21 Thread sebb
Build-Plugin adds a link to #apache-commons IRC channel on irc.freenode.org Do we still use IRC, and if so, is it on freenode.org? Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [DISCUSS] - Move commons-chain to dormant?

2023-10-21 Thread Bruno Kinoshita
+1 On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 00:48, sebb wrote: > Reviving this thread. > > I think we should now change chain to dormant. > > Sebb > > On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 at 16:10, Pascal Schumacher > wrote: > > > > Looks like Apache Tiles 3 does not use commons-chain. > > > > The only mention of commons-chain I

Re: [DISCUSS] - Move commons-chain to dormant?

2023-10-21 Thread sebb
Reviving this thread. I think we should now change chain to dormant. Sebb On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 at 16:10, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > > Looks like Apache Tiles 3 does not use commons-chain. > > The only mention of commons-chain I could find in > https://github.com/apache/tiles/tree/trunk was an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.15.0 based on RC1

2023-10-21 Thread Gary Gregory
Yeah, I saw that on the site and simplified it, but I missed the release notes, we can pretty up the text post release. Certainly not a blocker IMO. Gary On Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 4:43 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > One nit. In the release notes I see this: > > Commons IO 2.9.0 requires Java 8.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.15.0 based on RC1

2023-10-21 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
One nit. In the release notes I see this: Commons IO 2.9.0 requires Java 8. Commons IO 2.8.0 requires Java 8. Commons IO 2.7 requires Java 8. Commons IO 2.6 requires Java 7. Commons IO 2.5 requires Java 6. Commons IO 2.4 requires Java 6. Commons IO 2.3 requires Java 6. Commons IO 2.2 requires

[ALL] Why run scorecards and CodeQL weekly?

2023-10-21 Thread sebb
I don't understand why Scorecard analysis and CodeQL are being run weekly as well as on push/pull. Does the output somehow change if there has been no change in the input? Or does the generated output expire? Surely it is only necessary to run the analysis when there has been a change to the

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.15.0 based on RC1

2023-10-21 Thread Gary Gregory
We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons IO 2.14.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO 2.15.0. Apache Commons IO 2.15.0 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.15.0-RC1 (svn revision 64652)

Re: [ALL] Java CI badge does not agree with workflow status

2023-10-21 Thread sebb
I've done a check of most of the components. I found another discrepancy: https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/workflows/Java%20CI/badge.svg - passing https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/actions/workflows/maven.yml/badge.svg - failing The latter is correct: