This vote thread passes with the following +1 binding votes:
- Gary Gregory (ggregory)
- Rob Tompkins (chtompki)
- Henri Biestro (henrib)
Gary
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 9:26 AM Henri Biestro wrote:
>
> [ +1 ]
>
> Site looks good, javadoc looks good, reports Ok (nit jacoco missing).
>
> Tested
The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce Apache Commons CLI Version 1.8.0.
Apache Commons CLI provides a simple API for presenting, processing,
and validating a Command Line Interface.
This release contains new features and bug fixes and requires Java 8 or above.
New Features
This vote thread passes with the following 3 +1 binding votes, with
other votes listed:
- Gary Gregory (ggregory, binding) +1
- Eric Pugh (epugh, non-binding) +1
- Rob Tompkins (chtompki, binding) +1
- Paul King (non-binding) +1
- Henri Biestro (henrib, binding) +1
- Emmanuel Bourg (ebourg,
From my perspective, we all need to move on to newer versions of Java, and
while it’s a pain, it’s also key to gaining new capabilities.
> On May 23, 2024, at 3:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> User experience is subjective... ;-)
>
> What happens when Java 11 is EOL? The frames will be gone
User experience is subjective... ;-)
What happens when Java 11 is EOL? The frames will be gone for good anyway.
Gary
On Thu, May 23, 2024, 3:41 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> So there is nothing I can do to convince you to install OpenJDK 11 to
> improve the user experience? Having multiple JDKs
So there is nothing I can do to convince you to install OpenJDK 11 to
improve the user experience? Having multiple JDKs installed isn't
uncommon though.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 23/05/2024 à 20:47, Gary Gregory a écrit :
ATM, I am using Java 17 for everything, at work, at FOSS.
Gary
On Thu, May
ATM, I am using Java 17 for everything, at work, at FOSS.
Gary
On Thu, May 23, 2024, 2:28 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> What about building with JDK 11 and the -frame option then? That's the
> best of both worlds.
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
> Le 23/05/2024 à 18:44, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> > I
What about building with JDK 11 and the -frame option then? That's the
best of both worlds.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 23/05/2024 à 18:44, Gary Gregory a écrit :
I disagree, I think the search box is a great feature.
Gary
On Thu, May 23, 2024, 11:26 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
-0
The javadoc was
Hi Bernd,
Thank you for researching this issue and presenting your findings.
In 2.9.0, we had (as you found):
public static void installListener(final FileObject file, final
FileListener listener) {
final WeakRefFileListener weakListener = new WeakRefFileListener(file,
listener);
Hello,
I am dealing with a heapdump of VFS where I see a lot of WeakRefFileListener
and all of them have a empty WeakRef to no listener. While I think I found the
reason for that and fixed it on a dependent project, it still does not clean
up correctly. I think the reason is that it does not
I disagree, I think the search box is a great feature.
Gary
On Thu, May 23, 2024, 11:26 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> -0
>
> The javadoc was built with Java 17 and is less usable than the javadoc
> generated by Java 8. I recommend building the next release with Java 8
> instead.
>
> Emmanuel
-0
The javadoc was built with Java 17 and is less usable than the javadoc
generated by Java 8. I recommend building the next release with Java 8
instead.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 19/05/2024 à 16:55, Gary Gregory a écrit :
We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
CLI
[ +1 ]
Site, Javadoc, reports look good.
Nit: site refers to version 1.7.0, so are the release notes and the JIRA report
is not helpful.
Using:
mvn clean install site
On:
mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.8.6 (84538c9988a25aec085021c365c560670ad80f63)
Maven home:
[ +1 ]
Site looks good, javadoc looks good, reports Ok (nit jacoco missing).
Tested using:
mvn clean install site
On:
Apache Maven 3.8.6 (84538c9988a25aec085021c365c560670ad80f63)
Maven home: /Users/hbiestro/Java/apache-maven-3.8.6
Java version: 17.0.8, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
+1
> On May 18, 2024, at 12:56 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons Compress 1.26.1 was
> released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Compress 1.26.2.
>
> Apache Commons Compress 1.26.2 RC1 is available for review here:
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
