le.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> +1 (non-binding obviously): OS X, Fed14.
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:17 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> The tag is here:
+1 (non-binding obviously): OS X, Fed14.
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:17 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The tag is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_6_RC2
>
> The distribution zips/tars are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.6-rc2/
>
> Maven artifacts
On Mar 24, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/03/2011 20:01, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 23/03/2011 19:54, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 3/23/11 12:36 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Phil,
I believe all the pool issues for 1.5.x have been resolved. Over to
you... :)
>>> Thank
On Sep 14, 2010, at 6:20 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/09/2010 11:17, Benoit Perroud wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Regarding
>>
>> 1) Replace wait/notify with 1.5+ thread management
>>
>> Is there already any work or ideas on how to use Java util concurrent (JUC)
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc
On Sep 5, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The distribution zips/tars are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-rc2/
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-rc2/maven/
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-rc2/docs/
>
On Aug 29, 2010, at 11:18 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The distribution zips/tars are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/maven/
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-RC1/docs/
On Dec 30, 2009, at 6:31 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> The 1.3 code builds and tests OK with Java 1.4.2 and 1.5.0, but
> generates a lot of stack traces from TestManual.testLogWriter().
> Ideally the output should be suppressed.
>
> However, compilation fails when using Java 1.6.0. Unfortunately the POM s
On Dec 8, 2009, at 7:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I have prepared release candidates for DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. Please all
>> interested parties have a look and test. If all goes well, I will
>> kick off a release VOTE based on these artifacts in the next couple
>> of days. I s
On Nov 12, 2009, at 9:20 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> We have found and fixed another pool 1.5 regression (POOL-152) and
> we would like to cut a patch release including the fix.
>
> Release distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.4-RC1/
>
> Maven artifacts:
> http://people.apac
On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 22/09/09 18:05, Jim Jagielski wrote:
# First, try the environment.
for envname in 'TMPDIR', 'TEMP', 'TMP':
OK. You've convinced me :)
*grin* :)
Cheers!
-
On Sep 22, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 22/09/09 16:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:34 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
+ private static final String
On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 22/09/09 16:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:34 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
+ private static final String [] try_envs = {
+ "TMP",
+ "TEMP",
+
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:34 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
+private static final String [] try_envs = {
+"TMP",
+"TEMP",
+"TMPDIR",
+"TEMPDIR"
+};
Not sure abou
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:34 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
+private static final String [] try_envs = {
+"TMP",
+"TEMP",
+"TMPDIR",
+"TEMPDIR"
+};
Not sure about that ordering, unless we want to favor Windows.
For Unix the canonical envvar is TMPDIR, so it s
On Sep 18, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:31 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
+1.
Keys good.
Sigs good.
Manifest looks good on jar.
Javadoc has correct version.
NOTICE good.
LICENSE good.
RELEASE NOTES good (matches JIRA).
Source unpacks happily and builds a jar
On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:31 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
+1.
Keys good.
Sigs good.
Manifest looks good on jar.
Javadoc has correct version.
NOTICE good.
LICENSE good.
RELEASE NOTES good (matches JIRA).
Source unpacks happily and builds a jar without problem.
Confirmed the above... Plus:
init:
c
On Sep 17, 2009, at 6:56 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
POOL-149 impacts Grails badly. The Grails project is aiming to
release
Grails 1.2 soon and they need a 1.5.3 release or they'll have to drop
back to 1.4.x
I'd really like to see Grails using pool 1.5.x as it offers a good
op
On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Michael Heuer wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
There are times when add in -h/--help and want to allow people
to just go ahead and call the app with that option. The rub is, of
course, if there are any required options, in addition to the usage
message they also get a
There are times when add in -h/--help and want to allow people
to just go ahead and call the app with that option. The rub is, of
course, if there are any required options, in addition to the usage
message they also get a superfluous "Missing required" note as well...
This is, imo at least, ugly.
Trying to duplicate...
On Jun 2, 2009, at 3:03 PM, sebb wrote:
I've been running the GKOP and GOP tests repeatedly, and there are
some tests which still fail now and then:
The following test fails regularly:
testThreaded1(org.apache.commons.pool.impl.TestGenericObjectPool)
Time elapsed: 6 sec
t;
> Have fun,
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
--
===========
Jim Jagielski
On May 28, 2009, at 4:33 AM, sebb wrote:
On 28/05/2009, Julius Davies wrote:
Hi,
I created CODEC-75 (url-safe Base64) and attached a 20KB patch to the
ticket. Anyone interested in committing this?
The patch improves codec's base64 handling in two ways:
1. Ability to decode base64 streams
+1. The release was/is fine :)
On May 21, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Thanks Rainer.
I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything
works then.
I don't think this does require a new vote, RC, etc. since it was just
a broker link... right guys?
Thanks aga
On May 18, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
I have finished working my way through the open POOL bugs.
Of the remaining issues, 2 are bugs that only affect the 2.0
branch and
rest are improvements.
Given that Tomcat is waiting on a DBCP release a
enerally shepherd CLI currently and Phil generally
shepherds DBCP - though any of the committers can apply but it gives
you names to hassle if there is no response.
Hen
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
If possible, I'd like karma for commons-sandbox. Also, I will
doing some wo
On May 18, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Jim Jagielski
wrote:
On May 18, 2009, at 2:39 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
HttpClient is another example that is complained about by users :)
The
only saving grace of v4 is that it is now named
If possible, I'd like karma for commons-sandbox. Also, I will
doing some work on cli and dbcp (to start) and if the PMC would
like to give me prelim-karma for that as well, that would be
appreciated :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: d
On May 18, 2009, at 2:39 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
HttpClient is another example that is complained about by users :) The
only saving grace of v4 is that it is now named HttpComponents Core
(fitting Stephen's suggestion of a new name).
Well, this is kinda appropriate because I really have so
28 matches
Mail list logo
