length.
But we have 100.000s of instances. That might sum up. We need to trace it
finally. Otherwise +1 for interfaces.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Honton, Charles charles_hon...@intuit.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org; Mark Struberg
strub
URLs in a map you need to do special tricks :(
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Honton, Charles charles_hon...@intuit.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org; Mark Struberg
strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2012 1:59 AM
Subject: Re: [classscan
good stuff.
I'd like to go on and do the following:
in ./trunk add the following new directories
tck - our mass tests, etc which we can use for common testing, performance
measurements, etc
api - the part a user interacts with
impl-bcel - move Chas' work to
impl-xbf - move
-
From: Matt Benson mben...@apache.org
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org; Mark Struberg
strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: [classscan] Source repository
Hello all,
As Charles has been recently voted in as a Commons committer by
virtue
I can help out with git as well. And if you have maven question allas (I
initially wrote the maven-scm-providers-git).
You can look at the DeltaSpike configuration. Especially the
maven-release-plugin needs some attention.
I suggest to use
configuration
pushChangesfalse/pushChanges
Sorry, I'm still under heavy load at $$dayjob and had not yet time to review
Charles work :(
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 12:49 AM
Subject:
2. Is JIRA integrated with Git?
There has been an issue with this as the jira.git plugin is an almost 1:1 copy
of jira-git plugin. So it works fine, but atm you cannot use both plugins
(svn+git) in the same jira installation ^^
I'm not yet sure if this got fixed by atlassian already, but I'm
Hi folks!
What is the current status of dbcp in commons and in tomcat?
My $$dayjob project likes to switch from c3p0 to dbcp, but which one to take?
The winner will get a free beer at ApacheConEU :)
LieGrue,
strub
-
To
gnn of course it should read the jira-git plugin is an almost 1:1 copy of the
jira-svn plugin
LieGrue,
stru
- Original Message -
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: Git
tomcat dbcp?
Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi folks!
What is the current status of dbcp in commons and in tomcat?
My $$dayjob project likes to switch from c3p0 to dbcp, but which one to
take?
The winner will get a free beer at ApacheConEU :)
LieGrue,
strub
.
Reminds me of this xkcd http://xkcd.com/927
-David
On Apr 23, 2012, at 1:54 PM, Honton, Charles wrote:
Can we agree on the interface before debating the
implementation?
Thanks,
Chas
On 4/22/12 10:48 AM, Mark Struberg
strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi!
Still had no time
Sigis new job title: Release Candidate Manager :)
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Siegfried Goeschl sgoes...@gmx.at
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 10:21 PM
Subject: [email] Preparing RC3 for commons-email
Hi
Hi!
Still had no time to grok the source as I was at a conference last week.
Please note that David Blevins did lots of work in this area as well in
xbean-finder.
This stuff is really fast - a few times faster than the other solutions
available...
Thus before we import new classes we should
into an ASF codebase. Sorry for having
pushed for this in the case of [meiyo], but the point is that Mark
Struberg is after all free to add his
https://github.com/struberg/Apache-commons-classscanner code to
[classscan]. This will give us a little more to discuss wrt merging
its and [meiyo]'s features
Hi folks!
Over at the DeltaSpike we are discussing about a generic logging layer which we
can exchange easily.
We have been reluctant to use slf4j because some containers use different
layers etc. But jul is also not really satisfying.
It should be easily shadeable and use java6 features like
- Original Message -
From: ralph.goers @dslextreme.com ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org; Mark Struberg
strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: any plans for commons-logging-2.0?
You could look
This might be a bit OT, but is there a cardinal way to create code with and
without doPrivileged code?
I mean something like pre-processing or a replacement with sed.
In OpenWebBeans we introduced a SecurityService SPI with 2 implementations:
A standard one without doPrivileged and an enforcing
Create a test.jar as attached artifact. Then create a sub module where you
dependency:unpack this test-jar and run the tests in your new configuration.
This can also be done via the maven-invoker-plugin.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: Commons
:56 AM
On 2011-08-11, Mark Struberg wrote:
That's great news and even underlines better what
Christian already
stated: committocracy doen't really work out - not
socially and not
even technically.
No argument from my side.
The code in question seems to got moved a few times,
so all
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 8/11/11, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
From: Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [general] Plexus and Commons code inherited from somewhere else
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011, 9:40 AM
On 2011-08-11, Mark Struberg wrote
A common pattern is to introduce an own 'run-its' profile which configures
surefire to pickup those tests.
It's just not good to have tests which in summary takes longer than 3 minutes
to run. This usually leads to developers using -Dmaven.test.skip=true which is
kind of counter productive...
@commons.apache.org
Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011, 3:29 PM
On 2011-08-11, Mark Struberg wrote:
A common pattern is to introduce an own 'run-its'
profile which
configures surefire to pickup those tests.
How? 8-)
Do I put the test into a separate directory and tell
surefire inside the
profile
Commits != work
I'm currently in the progress of rewriting plexus-utils and other stuff from
over at codehaus to be able to use an IP clean version of it for Maven again.
This is needed since some folks are throwing dirt and claiming that they did
most of the work, yada yada yada...
Of
Hi Mark!
Exactly the classloader problem is what we try to solve in log4j-2.0. Tomcat is
by far not the only project which suffers a lot from this shortcoming.
OpenWebBeans, MyFaces, OpenJPA, etc - all projects which are usually in a
shared classpath have the problem that they cannot cleanly
Folks, I' suggest the following:
1.) create single JARs which exactly do what they should.
2.) use the maven-shade-plugin [1] to package 'bundles' containing some fitting
jars of your project just for convenience.
LieGrue,
strub
[1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/
--- On
...@carmanconsulting.com
Subject: Re: [sandbox] [classscan] classscan API design review needed
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 11:01 PM
Why the client / server
nomenclature? Makes it sound too heavyweight
On Jul 28, 2011 4:20 PM, Mark Struberg strub
://s.apache.org/Vsb
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Mark
Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
wrote:
Hi folks!
We need a few idea and
brainstorming on the filter/selection mechanism for our new
classscan-api (yes, 3 's' in classscan
Hi Simo!
Sorry, I guess I was not clear enough!
Some specs require us to pickup this info from some config (e.g.
META-INF/beans.xml). The classscan-client needs to pickup this configuration
from there and must tell it the classscan-server somehow. This could be some
form of Domain Specific
Hi folks!
We need a few idea and brainstorming on the filter/selection mechanism for our
new classscan-api (yes, 3 's' in classscan).
There are some specs which require some marker files to actually enable the
class scanning. E.g. the JSR-299 CDI spec defines that only jars with
sandbox karma to:
struberg (Mark Struberg)
dblevins (David Blevins)
gpetracek (Gerhard Petracek}
Thanks,
Matt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
wrote:
Hi!
Jakob Korherr (apacheId jakobk) is also interested and
did some work in this area in MyFaces and OWB already.
There are 2 main parts in this project
://s.apache.org/5Gt
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
wrote:
Hi Simo!
Yea, taking the best ideas of both projects
maybe we can ask Henri and Sebb to push a commons-lang-3.0-pre-1 release?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message
From: David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 11:35:01 PM
Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang
I have no problems
folks, please keep on voting.
There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be named as
long it's not a SNAPSHOT :)
txs and LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Commons Developers List
Thanks Donald for pushing it!
I'm not a commons guy, but I wait desperately for getting the agimatec stuff
over to apache (already using it in a productive project).
What about the package names?
org.apache.commons.validator
or e.g.
org.apache.openvalidator
?
It would be nice to know where
I personally don't get all the discussion here, because this very question has
imho been discussed a lot in the past (on commons and maven lists).
From what I know the widely agreed output of this discussion has been:
1.) do n PRJ-x-RC-n before cutting a release and vote on them as if they
I assume 'cutting a release' as doing a mvn release:stage or something similar.
The release artifacts will only be pushed to the public repos and download
areas etc. after the vote has finally passed.
The way this works basically moves all the effort to the last RC-n voting step.
It is
Hiho!
I wrote a version based on the mirror on github which is available here:
http://github.com/struberg/commons-lang/commit/ed8515f63290eba6e38ff5b79772e87b27dde32b
I will create a JIRA and also attached a patch for those not familiar with git.
LieGrue,
strub
--- Mark Struberg strub
good point.
The correct groupId should be org.apache.commons
Sadly this is true for a few projects like commons.lang, but it's not true for
all projects, since a few commons projects already use the 'correct' groupId.
Also, this approach would not scale in the future.
LieGrue,
strub
-
,
strub
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com
An: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 14. Mai 2009, 01:17:41 Uhr
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [releasing] SVN Tag creeated by maven
Mark Struberg wrote:
You are right, but maybe
+1 for new packages
-0 for x-ng
let's make 1 step back and see the issue from the distance.
What's currently going on is not a simple 'feature addition' which has to be
compatible. It's more about an effort to use a lot of cool features which are
available since java-5 _without_ having to
So if you tag the RC as DBUTILS_1_2_RC1 then the
source code includes RC1. If you then later copy that tag to DBUTILS_1_2
the source code will still say RC1.
Sorry Dan, there are a lot things missing in mavens release process, but this
very thing is imho not a problem with maven but with
@commons.apache.org
Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 13. Mai 2009, 22:54:05 Uhr
Betreff: Re: AW: [releasing] SVN Tag creeated by maven
Mark Struberg wrote:
So if you tag the RC as DBUTILS_1_2_RC1 then the source code includes
RC1.
If you then later copy that tag to DBUTILS_1_2 the source code
- the below sounds good and a JIRA issue with a patch would rock :)
Thanks,
Hen
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi!
I'm a long time user (and big fan) of commons.lang.Validate because it's a
very neat pattern
for getting stable software modules
Hi!
I'm a long time user (and big fan) of commons.lang.Validate because it's a very
neat pattern for getting stable software modules.
I'm PMC member on Apache OpenWebBeans and currently also writing the
maven-scm-provider-jgit (JGIT is a native Java implementation of GIT). Since
jgit-core
101 - 145 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
