Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/43
All I did was point out that it isn't logically serializable at all points
in its usage.
My suggestion is that there is design with a builder (serializable) and
instance (not seriali
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/43
AbstractRDFParser is stateful at some points in its lifecycle - input
stream and the threadpool/futures.
Is this mixing a builder for the configuration, where serialization makes
sense
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/43
Relaying a question from sebb on the JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-49#comment-16236065 including
pointing out the long term restriction that comes with it
Github user afs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/42#discussion_r147701690
--- Diff:
jena/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/jena/DatasetJenaTest.java ---
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
* "License"); you may not use this file
Github user afs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/42#discussion_r147701840
--- Diff:
jena/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/jena/impl/JenaDatasetImpl.java ---
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ public long size() {
@Override
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/32
I haven't looked at the code in enough detail but I was assuming there
would be one place with two functions: Quad->JenaQuad and JenaQuad->Quad. This
would the strategy (policy) for
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/32
`defaultGraph` is explicit name of the default graph in Jena,
`defaultGraphNode` is for when the system is generating it, not for data.
There are methods for "is this the default graph?&
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/30
You mean you tried to Graph.delete a triple?
That deletes exact triples (.equals). Graph.remove deletes triples that
match (same value) by using "find" that has the value-matching
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/30
RDF 1.1 mentions:
1. Turtle parsing - there is a lang tag rule.
2. The text that conversion to a lowercase lexical is allowed.
3. Value-comparison is case insensitive.
Which
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/30
@ansell mentions one of the reasons the wording for RDF 1.1is not so direct
- RDF 1.0 did not sanction the common normalization defined in BCP47
canonicalization, although that actually requires
10 matches
Mail list logo
