On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:33 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that some of the CSV methods uses int l (ell).
This is unfortunately very similar to 1 (one) in many fonts.
ExtendedBufferedReader.read(...) and UnicodeUnescapeReader.read(...)
both do this.
Now that would perhaps be a
On 14 March 2012 14:00, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:33 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that some of the CSV methods uses int l (ell).
This is unfortunately very similar to 1 (one) in many fonts.
ExtendedBufferedReader.read(...) and
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:27 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 March 2012 14:00, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:33 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that some of the CSV methods uses int l (ell).
This is unfortunately very similar to 1
Personally, I despise single character parameters/variable names.
Seriously, is it that much work to type a few extra characters and make
the name meaningful?
-Adrian
On 3/14/2012 1:33 PM, sebb wrote:
I noticed that some of the CSV methods uses int l (ell).
This is unfortunately very similar
On 14 March 2012 16:39, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
Personally, I despise single character parameters/variable names. Seriously,
is it that much work to type a few extra characters and make the name
meaningful?
Sometimes single char names are clearer.
E.g. in for
Le 14/03/2012 18:11, sebb a écrit :
Sometimes single char names are clearer.
E.g. in for loops, using i and j is such a common idiom that renaming
won't necessarily improve readability.
Same thing for x and y as coordinates.
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic
Except in nested loops: Which integer is being incremented, the inner
loop or outer loop? If the outer loop used outer instead of i, and the
inner loop used inner instead of j, then the loop being incremented is
obvious.
Idioms make sense as long as they're *your* idioms. To others it's
On Mar 14, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 14/03/2012 18:11, sebb a écrit :
Sometimes single char names are clearer.
E.g. in for loops, using i and j is such a common idiom that renaming
won't necessarily improve readability.
Same thing for x and y as coordinates.
I doubt
