Re: [All] Exclude a module from released binaries (Was: Issue in POM [...])

2021-07-21 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mer. 21 juil. 2021 à 16:27, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 13:16, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > FWIW, Commons VFS does not publish its Sandox module. > > > > One reason to not publish a binaray version of a module is to lessen the > > chance of complaints of breaking changes.

Re: [All] Exclude a module from released binaries (Was: Issue in POM [...])

2021-07-21 Thread Alex Herbert
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 13:16, Gary Gregory wrote: > FWIW, Commons VFS does not publish its Sandox module. > > One reason to not publish a binaray version of a module is to lessen the > chance of complaints of breaking changes. This might not happen for > examples but you never know what people

Re: [All] Exclude a module from released binaries (Was: Issue in POM [...])

2021-07-21 Thread Gary Gregory
FWIW, Commons VFS does not publish its Sandox module. One reason to not publish a binaray version of a module is to lessen the chance of complaints of breaking changes. This might not happen for examples but you never know what people do with code we put out there. Gary On Wed, Jul 21, 2021,

[All] Exclude a module from released binaries (Was: Issue in POM [...])

2021-07-21 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Le mer. 21 juil. 2021 à 05:09, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Even though I've included the example module binaries in releases for > commons-numbers and commons-geometry, I would vote that we only > include them in source form in the future. Well the question is whether *this* is an