Gary Gregory wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Thomas Neidhart
thomas.neidh...@gmail.comwrote:
On 03/23/2013 12:41 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi,
while looking through the code, I was asking myself why we expose
implementation classes. Wouldn't it be better to extract
2013/3/25 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de
Gary Gregory wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Thomas Neidhart
thomas.neidh...@gmail.comwrote:
On 03/23/2013 12:41 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi,
while looking through the code, I was asking myself why we expose
Le 23/03/2013 12:41, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
WDYT?
Benedikt
-1, this is overly complicated for such a simple component.
I once wished we could design something simple and elegant, but it seems
the wind is blowing in another direction, so I'll just give up.
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
On 3/23/2013 12:59 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 03/23/2013 12:41 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi,
while looking through the code, I was asking myself why we expose
implementation classes. Wouldn't it be better to extract interfaces from
CSVParser, CSVPrinter and CSVRecord? At least for the
I agree. Interfaces would make sense if you expected to have many different
implementations.
+1
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Thomas Neidhart
thomas.neidh...@gmail.comwrote:
On 03/23/2013 12:41 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi,
while looking through the code, I was asking myself why we expose
implementation classes. Wouldn't it be better to extract interfaces from
CSVParser,
Hi,
while looking through the code, I was asking myself why we expose
implementation classes. Wouldn't it be better to extract interfaces from
CSVParser, CSVPrinter and CSVRecord? At least for the CSVRecord it would
make sense because users cannot create CSVRecord instances. Why binding
them to a
On 03/23/2013 12:41 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi,
while looking through the code, I was asking myself why we expose
implementation classes. Wouldn't it be better to extract interfaces from
CSVParser, CSVPrinter and CSVRecord? At least for the CSVRecord it would
make sense because users
